The Impeachment Thread

#6,701
#6,701
BowlBrother85 said:
The whistleblower's motive for lodging the complaint no longer matters. As Schiff said, they have the docs. In other words, the whistleblower's complaint has been proven factual. These aren't allegations anymore. They are established facts that go well beyond what the whistleblower even claimed.
Click to expand...

Well, you got him then, what's the hold up?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40, Obsessed and C-south
#6,702
#6,702
RockyTop85 said:
Sure. I’m not saying there’s anything that could happen in the house that will change that outcome either.

Just saying it proves my point about it being political. It’s not a criminal procedure. There’s no objective measure of guilt or innocence. There’s no fixed procedure.

Overwhelming public support is the only thing that really matters. That’s how it was intended.
Click to expand...

Well, it is always going to have a political element.
I took it that you are saying the start of impeachment proceedings can be started just for "political" reasons and without any allegations of crimes. Just because you dislike ones policies or the person would be very troublesome.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#6,705
#6,705
This is not by accident the former Ukrainian govt worked very close with the DNC to push the false Russian collusion hoax Thankfully the new President is working with Trump to get the documents and end the corruption
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and FallCreekVols
#6,709
#6,709
VolnJC said:
Remember this is just an impeachment party...no subpoenas..they can ask really nicely if they want
Click to expand...

Misleading article from what I skimmed. It was tied to issues with the 2016 section. That is not out of the Presidential scope. Just cleaning up corruption just like the last administration.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolnJC
#6,710
#6,710
AM64 said:
What about it? You know some day I think I'll look up that word ... maybe - I assume it came from the me me generations. Anyway I'm over 70, so it's not part of my vocabulary, and I don't actually much care about it and a lot of your generation's other drivel (or is it dribble?). I do chuckle at a few - particularly if they include something like the Roadrunner.
Click to expand...

LOL, I'm over 70 too but I didn't get old.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rifleman
#6,711
#6,711
RockyTop85 said:
I’m the energizer bunny of arguing but we’re just not getting anywhere. I really did change my mind about whether you were trying to “but Obama.” I think we were just having two different conversations.
Click to expand...

More like JG and Timex you take a licking and keep on ticking, but you can't connect with the target. You are resilient and determined, though; and, honestly, your responses are heads and shoulders above the other lawyers here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1
#6,714
#6,714
Hunerwadel said:
LOL, I'm over 70 too but I didn't get old.
Click to expand...

I also have to admit that I'm just an engineer. I stayed out of your poly sci, philosophy, psychology classes, and whatever other head bending exercises you wallowed in in college. Probably explains some of the other disconnects in our language. BTW is "gaslighting" where someone lights a match to burn off the collected farts during one of those ppp class skull sessions that used to go on in the dorms ... the ones that made you feel like hip waders were necessary when going down the hall?
 
#6,716
#6,716
AOC thinks impeachment is boring..she also said it should have been done long before on policies that hurt her constitutes 🙄
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#6,717
#6,717
AM64 said:
More like JG and Timex you take a licking and keep on ticking, but you can't connect with the target. You are resilient and determined, though; and, honestly, your responses are heads and shoulders above the other lawyers here.
Click to expand...
Weren’t you the guy that argued back in May that Trump’s corruption was accidental and he just didn’t know what he was doing and that it didn’t matter that he fired all the people that kept him from doing it, because he’d learned his lesson?

🤔 Talk about swing and a miss.

(I like the analogies though.)
 
#6,721
#6,721
RockyTop85 said:
Weren’t you the guy that argued back in May that Trump’s corruption was accidental and he just didn’t know what he was doing and that it didn’t matter that he fired all the people that kept him from doing it, because he’d learned his lesson?

🤔 Talk about swing and a miss.

(I like the analogies though.)
Click to expand...

In my bestest dim voice, "I have no recollection of that." Certainly doesn't sound like my words ... unless you reinterpreted them for me. And at my advanced age, you really expect me to remember May? Now if she was really hot...
 
  • Like
Reactions: RockyTop85 and Orangeburst
#6,722
#6,722
VolnJC said:
So you guys are upset that Trump might have been inquiring about a Quid Pro Quo from the previous administration but that QPQ doesn't bother u in the least or that Obama ordered wiretaps on the GOP candidate for office?
Click to expand...

Who says we don't care? And why does anyones after-the-fact outrage matter now? What level of foot-stomping anger about what the long gone administration may have done would appease your ilk to say "OK, OK, OK.... They're mad about this..... NOW we can admit that the current administration completely fuqd up and should be held accountable." You and I both know you wouldn't, instead you do exactly what you're doing... whistle past the graveyard screeching "whatabout".

RE: the wiretaps, where's the evidence of that? Trump lies so damn much - it's breathtaking that anyone would believe anything he says without video evidence.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top