The Impeachment Thread

Odds on if his returns are actually under audit?

Why bother? We've been told the wealthy are paying so little now; it should be a waste of time for the IRS to audit them ... after all, the rich have all those high priced and shifty accountants, and the typical government clerk couldn't possibly be up to the job of unraveling what they neatly package.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
So what I've gathered from the weekend posts:

-Trump's kids can benefit from their "positions" in the White House. That's just savvy business sense.
-Hunter Biden can not benefit. Papa Biden is a Dem, so that's corruption.
-New whistleblower is a librulz plant from the Deep State. Nancy committed treason possibly, not clear on that yet. Waiting on further clarification from the Q boys.
-The same testimony that is being treated as a credible, slam dunk showing Trump did not expect a quid pro quo is correct, according to Red Hats. Except for that pesky part when the same dude in the same testimony clears Biden of any impropriety. Ignore that part, continue Biden narrative.
-Trump's nicknames are getting lamer by the day.

I think that covers everything. Seems like not much has changed since the beginning of last week.

Well, since things went a bit better Saturday, we probably aren't quite as surly today. Probably better if you don't re-invoke the beast mode.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
Well, since things went a bit better Saturday, we probably aren't quite as surly today. Probably better if you don't re-invoke the beast mode.

It was an exciting first half..Loved the passion and seems like the first time in a long time I saw it. Brought back memories of why we watch.
 
Here‘s a handy guide I remember seeing somewhere:

“Believe me” = “I’m lying”
“People are saying” = “I’m making this up”
“Fake News” = “I don’t like this news”
“Nobody knew” = “I just found out”

I've been reading ahead a lot of others - pretty lame. I'd propose a couple more

Whataboutism = We know there's precedent, but we don't want to talk about that

Deflection = We know you got us, so we're doing our best to blow it off

Not the same = Well, it is, but we're not admitting it

Unnamed source = We made it up

Government whistle blower = Traitorous SOB who trades in confidential information, but he/she is on our side ... this time
 
For example, if I have to constantly remind you that I am, in fact, against puppy torture, the conversational implication is that since I had to state it, there must have been some doubt about what my true view is on the subject.
He was talking about slavery in the context of the civil war. He expressed an opinion. I guess it was noteworthy to you. I read it and moved on.
For the record, i didn't believe you were into puppy torture. So no need for you to deny it. It works both ways.
 
I've been reading ahead a lot of others - pretty lame. I'd propose a couple more

Whataboutism = We know there's precedent, but we don't want to talk about that

Deflection = We know you got us, so we're doing our best to blow it off

Not the same = Well, it is, but we're not admitting it

Unnamed source = We made it up

Government whistle blower = Traitorous SOB who trades in confidential information, but he/she is on our side ... this time


I propose the following deal: We accept as accurate all allegations of wrongdoing by Biden, Biden's son, Obama, HRC, Shiff, Pelosi and any other Democrat you wanna throw under the bus.

Having accepting these things, now answer the question: What would you propose should be done our current President, DJT, who attempted to bribe Ukraine with taxpayer money to extort them for his own political gain?
 
Aaaaand... we're back to tired old whataboutisms.

It's TRUE "whataboutisms" though & it's what you protest about.....Dems are corrupt & liars to their core foundation & it needs to be pointed out. Fair about play......just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's not true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
I propose the following deal: We accept as accurate all allegations of wrongdoing by Biden, Biden's son, Obama, HRC, Shiff, Pelosi and any other Democrat you wanna throw under the bus.

Having accepting these things, now answer the question: What would you propose should be done our current President, DJT, who attempted to bribe Ukraine with taxpayer money to extort them for his own political gain?

I'd suggest better reading skills, and particularly a better understanding of words like "should" and "shall". Or perhaps you can't distinguish between "wish" and "command".

On the other hand when you pick a fight and lose; paybacks can be hell. Your party lost an election, couldn't get over it, cooked up a fake inquisition, lost, and it deserves some rich payback ... but in the end, you can't prove Trump tied any demand to his "requests" for investigations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan and Mick
Chuck Todd and Fake NBC News should wake up and listen to the REAL news they don't & won't report.

Bongino: Chuck Todd should resign and apologize for contentious interview with Sen. Ron Johnson

Chuck Todd is and has become more of a big POS then anyone else but CNN......the Mother of All Fake News.

I always though Tim Russert was a class act; too bad they couldn't find someone more like him as a replacement. Chuck Todd and most other political hacks are pretty worthless excuses for human beings.
 
Chuck Todd and Fake NBC News should wake up and listen to the REAL news they don't & won't report.

Bongino: Chuck Todd should resign and apologize for contentious interview with Sen. Ron Johnson

Chuck Todd is and has become more of a big POS then anyone else but CNN......the Mother of All Fake News.
That interview served it's purpose...raw meat for the lunatic left...they were on him the previous week for being too soft..he redeemed himself according to the mouth breathers yesterday according to their Twitter rants
 

VN Store



Back
Top