The Impeachment Thread

[RockyTop85]

Congressman Pete Sessions has been mentioned.

I guess congressman does specifically refer to the House.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Volker said he saw a different one.

Link? I haven’t seen that statement. What I heard Volker say was the transcript was the first he had heard Biden mentioned.

 

[NorthDallas40]

The second is apparently first hand, could be as you describe, could be someone closer to POTUS, who the Trumpies will retroactively label "Deep State".

I have a prepared excuse for you.. "You can't tattle on the president, it's not fair!"

You're welcome

Go ahead and tattle. But you better be able to back it up.

 

[evillawyer]

What’s the chance Trump actually gets removed from office?

Look at that. One down, one to go

 

[VolnJC]

I've been saying this all along there is no Quid Pro Quo and anyone saying there is..is either lying or misinformed

 

[NorthDallas40]

Look at that. One down, one to go

So.... soon...ish?

 

[evillawyer]

Ok Trump leg-humpers, do your best Baghdad Bob on this news.

 

[RockyTop85]

Link? I haven’t seen that statement. What I heard Volker say was the transcript was the first he had heard Biden mentioned.

He said he was given a readout on the call that did not include the Biden ask.

 

[NorthDallas40]

He said he was given a readout on the call that did not include the Biden ask.

Are you trying to pass off “a readout on the call” as the official transcript memorializing the event? Which is was the WH supposedly released? Because they would be foolish to produce a false one with classified document tracking and all.

And ok now I know what you are referencing. No, that does not contradict my original question. Try again? Any actual evidence that the WH provided transcript is not the only existing written official record of the call?

 

[RockyTop85]

Are you trying to pass off “a readout on the call” as the official transcript memorializing the event? Which is was the WH supposedly released? Because they would be foolish to produce a false one with classified document tracking and all.

And ok now I know what you are referencing. No, that does not contradict my original question. Try again? Any actual evidence that the WH provided transcript is not the only existing written official record of the call?

LMAO

 

[NorthDallas40]

LMAO

View attachment 230399

I’m moving the goal posts here? LMFAO!! Beautiful. I have asked the same question all along. And you offer that as an official transcript?

Maybe you guys can find some scribblings on the stall walls in the Dim House staffers unisex restroom to corroborate your conjecture

 

[RockyTop85]

I’m moving the goal posts here? LMFAO!! Beautiful. I have asked the same question all along. And you offer that as an official transcript?

Maybe you guys can find some scribblings on the stall walls in the Dim House staffers unisex restroom to corroborate your conjecture


View attachment 230401

Other than “it’s got ellipses in it!” do you have any proof that the released transcript isn’t the only existing written record of the call?

Apparently you misspelled “official transcript” the first time.

 

[carlos86]

Cause Hillary told them not to?

The IG was appointed by Trump.

 

[VolnJC]

The Dem Congress takes the impeachment process very seriously

 

[RockyTop85]

Nice deflection... counselor. So again any proof that the document provided isn’t the only written record?

And the second time.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Hey @RockyTop85 one thing I did find is doing a google search for “Volker phone transcript” was page after page after page of articles and tweets by GOP calling for the public release of the full Volker interview transcript. Surely your proof would be in there right?

And I saw a reference from Graham threatening to interview Volker in a public forum if they don’t do it

 

[Velo Vol]

 

[NorthDallas40]

Apparently you misspelled “official transcript” the first time.

LMAO. Annnnnnnd were down to splitting fine hairs now.

Better check those restroom stall walls

 

[lawgator1]

I've been saying this all along there is no Quid Pro Quo and anyone saying there is..is either lying or misinformed

Even assuming that were true, that does not make it ok for Trump to ask a foreign leader to ask for help in the election.

 

[NorthDallas40]

And the second time.

I’ve got a bar napkin that says your recount is incorrect. And I’d love to see you try to sell this line in a court of law

 

[Velo Vol]

 

[VolnJC]

Even assuming that were true, that does not make it ok for Trump to ask a foreign leader to ask for help in the election.

Just like the DNC asked Ukrainians to dig up dirt on Trump in 2016? Fine them both for election violations

 

[RockyTop85]

I’ve got a bar napkin that says your recount is incorrect. And I’d love to see you try to sell this line in a court of law

You’re right. You asked the same question three times until you got a bad answer and then you changed the question and acted bewildered that you got called out for moving the goalposts.

 

[Stew Cook]

By Redhat standards, it's game, set, match.

 

[NorthDallas40]

And the second time.

This could all be cleared up with the release of that actual phone call recording or transcript, wouldn't that make this all go away.

If it was so "perfect", certainly it'd be easy to get off the 'deep dark secrets' server and declassify.

Other than “it’s got ellipses in it!” do you have any proof that the released transcript isn’t the only existing written record of the call?

And now you know the rest of the story. Context is your friend.