Nobody said I didn't like it, I'm simply suggesting that common sense implies that if it was "perfect," why only release a "memorandum of recollections" instead of the actual tape?
You're ducking the obvious and it's funny to watch you try and spin it.
Trump has repeatedly asked Pelosi to have a vote. He's poked his finger in her eye, pushing to have a vote. IT may seem equally as obvious that he's withheld requests for a couple of reasons:
(1) To de-legitimize the inquiry. If he submits to their demands, he has given it legitimacy in the eyes of the public.
As his response said, if he submits to demands as made, he sets precedent for the office in the future, and weakens the office the next time Congress tries to strong arm without due process.
(2) To force a vote. There is no denying that there are Ds in red districts that really DO NOT want to weigh in on this thing, as they know it weakens their reelection. Trump could very well be playing politics and playing for congressional seats.
The elephant in the room with this line of argument is that, despite the assurances of the media and liberals on here, there's no proof that Trump did anything wrong. There's a he-said, (who?)-said. There's official documents that seem to support Trump's denials. There's the Ukrainian president saying that nothing underhanded happened, and no pressure was applied.
On the other side, there's the Dems making a circus of this, breaking protocol, trying to try this without a trial, without Trump having the ability to face his accusers. They're pushing for an impeachment and won't even let the public know on whose testimony they're trying to overturn the election.
While Trump is in a discomforting position, the Dems are in a suicidal position.
Why would Trump do anything to stop what they're doing right now?