The Impeachment Thread

#14,403
#14,403
Mick said:
Really. You will have to point to the super secret BS you think the R's were left out of.
Click to expand...

Being told when they can and can't question a witness, as members of the same committee, comes to mind ?? Just a thought.
 
#14,404
#14,404
Orangeburst65 said:
He refused to provide evidence to a Dem committee. Do not blame him one bit.
One thing you will notice from the R's on here, very few if any are worried about this.
The blowback on the Dems on this is going to be epic.
Click to expand...
If you don’t blame Trump for withholding evidence generated by the special counsel then you have no credibility to make a process argument when the majority party of Congress takes control of the investigation.

And yeah, 576 pages of nonsensical defenses and moving goalposts says “not worried” about as well as that transcript says “nothing burger.”
 
#14,407
#14,407
How come the democrats brought this up for a vote when they are going on vacation for the rest of the year, minus a week or two?
 
#14,409
#14,409
EIOygxTWkAUPZR-
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolnJC
#14,410
#14,410
tvolsfan said:
LOL

Republicans are going to want nothing to do with Trump about 8 seconds after he’s gone. They’re going to distance themselves from this whole thing and avoid discussing it as much as possible.
Click to expand...
I support President Trump completely, I will never waiver
 
#14,412
#14,412
GVF said:
Being told when they can and can't question a witness, as members of the same committee, comes to mind ?? Just a thought.
Click to expand...
That's the furthest thing from a "thought". You probably actually think you came up with that line yourself.
 
#14,413
#14,413
RockyTop85 said:
If you don’t blame Trump for withholding evidence generated by the special counsel then you have no credibility to make a process argument when the majority party of Congress takes control of the investigation.

And yeah, 576 pages of nonsensical defenses and moving goalposts says “not worried” about as well as that transcript says “nothing burger.”
Click to expand...

Are you advocating the DOJ hand over the grand jury testimony generated by the muell?
 
#14,419
#14,419
Mick said:
That's the furthest thing from a "thought". You probably actually think you came up with that line yourself.
Click to expand...

You probably think that by saying that, I will forget that those are things being reported out of the investigations. Schiff saying no, you can't interview that person.... Unless you were there and can report differently.
 
#14,421
#14,421
RockyTop85 said:
You need to read the rules for yourself and not rely on the misinformation being posted by your Trumpists brethren.
Click to expand...
Oh I did read this:
If Schiff agrees, Nunes can subpoena or request attendance and testimony of any person and the production of books, correspondence, and other documents.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
#14,422
#14,422
hog88 said:
If there were corroborating witnesses saying the same it might.

They way I understand these calls are handled is that they are not recorded, x number of analysts listen to the call, they write a memo of what they heard then they compare and come up with an official memo. So I wouldn't be surprised that it's common for them to disagree.
Click to expand...

Well, a disagreement would indicate an objection to omitting part of the dialogue. The paticular dialogue which would show the further extent that Trump was encouraging the Ukraine to investigate Bidens. Coincidence?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top