The Impeachment Thread

Seems both sides want to believe morally ambiguous people saying what they want to hear, none of which equates to fact. I agree with Brokaw. The Dems don't have the goods on Trump, at least not yet. They have no solid facts to hang their hat on, just opinion, which will always be questioned. In no way do I think Trump is completely above board, but you can't convict on suspicion alone. He pushes boundaries, but no factual proof has been provided to show he's pushed into impeachable behavior.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
Pokey Haunt Us Warren is lined up to spend $52 trillion dollars to make sure that illegals have health care and the country is bankrupt with millions of people out of work. Yep I hope you dems are ready for what she's offering.
 
Pokey Haunt Us Warren is lined up to spend $52 trillion dollars to make sure that illegals have health care and the country is bankrupt with millions of people out of work. Yep I hope you dems are ready for what she's offering.

She may be what some call smart as a tack but she's a complete lunatic w/this campaign proposal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hjeagle1vol
Lol.....Pretty much everyone in life including you too :eek::eek: are full of ****........ welcome aboard mate.
Believe me, I will not lose sleep over your lack of respect......I'm not here for your respect....doesn't pay the bills.
Somehow I doubt that wallowing in your own dishonesty and celebrating the fact that you evaluate information with a purely partisan, source based metric pays the bills, either. But I’ll defer to you on that.
 
Last edited:
Seems both sides want to believe morally ambiguous people saying what they want to hear, none of which equates to fact. I agree with Brokaw. The Dems don't have the goods on Trump, at least not yet. They have no solid facts to hang their hat on, just opinion, which will always be questioned. In no way do I think Trump is completely above board, but you can't convict on suspicion alone. He pushes boundaries, but no factual proof has been provided to show he's pushed into impeachable behavior.
What do you consider to be impeachable behavior?
 
Somehow I doubt that wallowing in your own dishonesty and celebrating the fact that you evaluate information with a purely partisan, source based metric pays the bills, either. But I’ll defer to you on that.

You're a true peon trooper for the loony left. Never change that color. They may promote you one day to something to get points for....like an atta boy. But keep talking shitt like a good little tool. Can't understand why you are all torn up about me wallowing in dishonesty & other blah blah blah....that it doesn't matter one iota...but carry on.
 
Last edited:
You're a true peon trooper for the loony left. Never change that color. They may promote you one day to something to get points for....like an atta boy. But keep talking shitt like a good little tool. Can't understand why you are all torn up about me wallowing in dishonesty & other blah blah blah....that doesn't matter one iota...but carry on.

1572648303453.gif
 
mrz110119dAPR20191101034522.jpg
 
The Dems are not drawing it out. The stonewalling for the last 3 years has. The past year has been court battles over evidence and testimony. I also don't think the flow of information from the WH will be more than a trickle, which will drag it out longer. The Hillary witch hunt went right up to the election. That didn't hurt the Republicans one bit.

No argument just a difference of opinion.
Wtf are you talking about?

Trump was elected less than 3 years ago.

* Crossfire hurricane counterintelligence investigation: nothing
* Mueller investigation: nada
* Emoluments: zip
* 25th amendment: zilch
* Trump’s a racist: nope
* Ukrainegate: Russia didn’t work, let’s try Ukraine
 
What do you consider to be impeachable behavior?

Proof of an actual crime that reaches the threshold of impeachment. And by proof, I mean more than speculation and opinion. More than politically biased interpretation of his actions. He may very well be guilty, it wouldn't surprise me, but it has to be proven. And the Dems are a long way from actually proving it.

Even then, I think history could present a problem. Clinton was dead to rights guilty and yet avoided removal from office. So being guilty may not be enough to remove Trump from office. I think it highly probable that it will come down to what the people decide in 2020.
 
Real Clear Investigations is not a credible source of news per media bias fact check and there has never been anything to substantiate the conspiracy theory that Ukraine interfered in the 2016 election to begin with. That is a lot of surmising and conjecture, on top of an unproven conspiracy theory. And it has still not been confirmed who the whistleblower was, but even to that end, his credibility and motives are no longer relevant. Lt. Col. Vindman, Bill Taylor and Kurt Volker have already confirmed everything alleged in the complaint, and Volker has testified that there is no evidence that Joe Biden had done anything illegal in the Ukraine.
Ok, try and spin the Politico reporting on it.

Or is Politico “not a credible source of news per media bias fact check”?

Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire
 
Nothing you have said makes Real Clear Investigations credible. They are not.

Why don’t the left ever research for themselves?

Senior Ukrainian official says he's opened probe into US election interference

This interview with John Solomon was published on 3/20/2019

Ukrainian Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko told Hill.TV’s John Solomon in an interview aired on Wednesday that he has opened a probe into alleged attempts by Ukrainians to interfere in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

“Today we will launch a criminal investigation about this and we will give legal assessment of this information,” Lutsenko said last week.
 

VN Store



Back
Top