The Impeachment Thread

  • Like
Reactions: Hayezb and VolnJC
This is a clown show



here’s the exchange between Zeldin and Bill Taylor

EJA-msMX0AA0T8g
 
Ukraine Aid Was Released After Federal Lawyers Said Trump Freeze Was Illegal: Report

It wasn’t Donald Trump who released the promised military aid to Ukraine, but the State Department, after lawyers determined that the White House freeze on the funds was illegal, several sources have told Bloomberg.

Trump has claimed he released the aid on September 11. But five sources told Bloomberg that $141 million of the money was actually authorized to be released several days earlier after lawyers determined that the White House Office of Management and Budget and, therefore, the president, had no legal standing to block the funds. The decision was outlined in a classified memo to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, according to Bloomberg.

The information severely undercuts Trump’s insistence that there was no quid pro quo for military aid when he pressed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in a July phone call to launch an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. Trump has pointed to the fact that he released the aid before a probe was begun. But Bloomberg now reports that Trump was no longer in control of disbursement when the money was released.

###

SHOCKING. Oh, well, guess he and his band of punk b*tches need to dream up a new lie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mick and tvolsfan
How many other countries have they frozen aid to? Surely Ukraine isn’t the only corrupt country we’re propping up.
B4D63410-0CC4-4368-B108-2270A5AA70B3.jpeg
The US designates different grades for distribution based on their civil rights stances, abuses, politics and several other factors that i can't remember from the report i read from the state dept months ago... Talk about some dry reading.
 
Ukraine Aid Was Released After Federal Lawyers Said Trump Freeze Was Illegal: Report

It wasn’t Donald Trump who released the promised military aid to Ukraine, but the State Department, after lawyers determined that the White House freeze on the funds was illegal, several sources have told Bloomberg.

Trump has claimed he released the aid on September 11. But five sources told Bloomberg that $141 million of the money was actually authorized to be released several days earlier after lawyers determined that the White House Office of Management and Budget and, therefore, the president, had no legal standing to block the funds. The decision was outlined in a classified memo to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, according to Bloomberg.

The information severely undercuts Trump’s insistence that there was no quid pro quo for military aid when he pressed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in a July phone call to launch an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. Trump has pointed to the fact that he released the aid before a probe was begun. But Bloomberg now reports that Trump was no longer in control of disbursement when the money was released.

###

SHOCKING. Oh, well, guess he and his band of punk b*tches need to dream up a new lie.
When does the 2.5 year investigation into DNC and Ukraine election collusion start?
 
Schiff denies GOP request to have Ukraine whistleblower testify publicly, warns against 'sham investigations'

Dims are in full panic mode.......scared that their crimes coming to light.....veto Repubs witnesses......Dims are chickens and do NOT won't the Truth about the crimes committed by the Obama Admin. to come forth.
Of all the nerve.......Adam Schitt warns of a sham investigation by Republicans......LOL.....dude is insane NOW.
Schiff is a traitor.
 
Also irrelevant. Trump's actions are what matter. The rest is GOP noise designed to distract.
Wrong. The transcript is what happened. The Ukranian President has first hand information and says it did not happen but you guys refuse to believe it. This whole think stinks and smells the schit. DIMs are corrupt and will be exposed along with some RINOs and Anti Trumpers.
 
The whistleblower is irrelevant now. As you all have pointed out, he/she has no first hand knowledge. The witnesses that matter are those that do.
Motive matters. Pretty ballsy being a whistleblower and risking your career over second hand knowledge.... Would you risk everything on second hand knowledge....I wouldn't. I better have heard it all if I was going to make that claim.
 

VN Store



Back
Top