The Impeachment Thread

So which is it young fella, what the whistleblower reported is of no value because he has no first-hand knowledge or it is of utmost value? You guys can't seem to make up your mind.
I think what the "whistleblower" claimed in their initial complaint is of no value to anyone one the transcript was released. What is is of great value is who wrote the actual complaint, how it was disclosed to the intelligence committee, how the information was garnered and what are the blowers political beliefs.
 
I haven't fully been able to find a answer if the Senate decides to continue with this farce will they be able to call the whistle-blower and or Schiffy to testify since the Republicans hold the majority?
The trial would be conducted by the Senate if the House approves articles of impeachment.
 
I think what the "whistleblower" claimed in their initial complaint is of no value to anyone one the transcript was released. What is is of great value is who wrote the actual complaint, how it was disclosed to the intelligence committee, how the information was garnered and what are the blowers political beliefs.

Same question to you. Why does it matter? If I hire a PI to follow someone because I hate his guts and the PI sees this guy commit a crime, for which the guy is reported, prosecuted and convicted, what relevance does my hatred of the guy have to the crime?
 
Same question to you. Why does it matter? If I hire a PI to follow someone because I hate his guts and the PI sees this guy commit a crime, for which the guy is reported, prosecuted and convicted, what relevance does my hatred of the guy have to the crime?

So had the republicans railroaded an impeachment of Obama and the man/woman that supposedly had the smoking gun that started the process was a ghost you wouldn't want to know their identity, reasoning or agenda?
 
Same question to you. Why does it matter? If I hire a PI to follow someone because I hate his guts and the PI sees this guy commit a crime, for which the guy is reported, prosecuted and convicted, what relevance does my hatred of the guy have to the crime?
Here's the problem, the CI didn't see a crime he reported a crime based on hearsay and his hatred of the other person. See any problem with that?
 
Same question to you. Why does it matter? If I hire a PI to follow someone because I hate his guts and the PI sees this guy commit a crime, for which the guy is reported, prosecuted and convicted, what relevance does my hatred of the guy have to the crime?
 
I think what the "whistleblower" claimed in their initial complaint is of no value to anyone one the transcript was released. What is is of great value is who wrote the actual complaint, how it was disclosed to the intelligence committee, how the information was garnered and what are the blowers political beliefs.
Why does it matter? The house is burning and when first responders get on the scene they see Trump holding matches. EDIT: Above post beat me to it but same analogy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan

VN Store



Back
Top