The Intel Leaks Thread

#153
#153
Orangeburst said:
Teixeira was a “cyber transport systems specialist,” essentially an IT specialist responsible for military communications networks, including their cabling and hubs. In that role Teixeira would have had a higher level of security clearance because he would have also been tasked with responsibility for ensuring protection for the networks, a defense official told the Associated Press, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters.

The Post adds that that Teixeira had access to the Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System, an internal Defense Department hub for top secret information, according a U.S. official.
Click to expand...
He has to have the clearance level to have access to networks he’s supporting. But that alone doesn’t grant right to know. I’m gonna guess a lot more heads are going to roll privately on people that didn’t protect info when the IT weenie was around unless the IT weenie purposely took advantage of access to get info he had no need to know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and Orangeburst
#155
#155
MontyPython said:
OK. You believe in full disclosure... lead by example:

What's your actual full name, age, address and occupation?
Click to expand...

Lol you sound as dumb as the senator asking Zuck which hotel he slept in. The government should be transparent. That does not mean citizens should be. I obviously have a right to privacy
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol since 77, 85SugarVol and Pepe_Silvia
#156
#156
hog88 said:
Other than putting me in charge of classifications no I don’t know what to do but the system needs to be overhauled.
Click to expand...
You’ve convinced me. You need to be the gate keeper of all the info. No go get all the Kennedy stuff released 😂
 
#158
#158
Vol8188 said:
Not a flex at all. Just means I’ve seen a decent amount of classified material working in a command post. Most of it could’ve been declassified without harm.

Your entire goal here has been to follow me to the bathroom with a ruler. Pretending I never had a clearance because I couldn’t remember something from 11 years ago, claiming my job must not have contact with nuclear info (hilarious given the nature of the command post), etc.

You’ve basically been trying to tap my foot under the bathroom stall
Click to expand...
No I’m laughing at someone who stated they had a very high clearance, which honestly I don’t doubt you did, while at the same time saying some really wrong stuff that contradicts with the clearance. And this isn’t the first time I’ve had this laugh over the years 😂
 
#159
#159
hog88 said:
Shouldn’t be able to.
Click to expand...
I agree with you 100%, but that doesn't seem to be the case. Here is another thing I was looking for and just found. So what "we" have now isn't directly attributed to the original leaker. These documents came from a second source that was privy to the leak and only sent some of the information to another party. There very well may be lots more out there somewhere. This is an article about the Chinese hypersonic nuke that was leaked, but it touches on what I just spoke about as well.

China secretly fired 6,500mph hypersonic missile that could hit US, docs show
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#162
#162
NorthDallas40 said:
The biggest take away I’ve seen is that the Intel basically contradicts the public statements of the admin as well as made public information of other sovereign states who didn’t want the info public. Basically we look like morons. Again.
Click to expand...
Which causes me to wonder why we're getting comments that insinuate this was a government orchestrated conspiracy and the alleged leaker was set up.
 
#163
#163
NorthDallas40 said:
No I’m laughing at someone who stated they had a very high clearance, which honestly I don’t doubt you did, while at the same time saying some really wrong stuff that contradicts with the clearance. And this isn’t the first time I’ve had this laugh over the years 😂
Click to expand...

What did I say that was wrong and “contradicted that clearance”?

You can find posts by me dating back to when I was in Afghanistan on this website and multiple times I’ve stated I was a command post controller. All command post controllers have a ts clearance. I knew plenty a good man who got moved to other career fields due to an inability to obtain one
 
#169
#169
Vol8188 said:
What did I say that was wrong and “contradicted that clearance”?

You can find posts by me dating back to when I was in Afghanistan on this website and multiple times I’ve stated I was a command post controller. All command post controllers have a ts clearance. I knew plenty a good man who got moved to other career fields due to an inability to obtain one
Click to expand...
I don’t doubt your claim to a clearance, Never did. I’ll accept it at face value even. And I’m totally on board with there is a bunch of stuff that is classified that when you see it stand alone you ask why. Been there many times but our type of info was different. I’d guess yours was mostly opsec whereas mine is design and performance data. But I can assure you that is over used also. The only thing I found highly suspect was the “right to know” claim. That single statement is behind our whole exchange.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#170
#170
RDU VOL#14 said:
That kid is 21 going on 14 and shared all of this stuff w/ video game buddies on his discord . He is “anti-war Christian” . Helluva place for an anti-war person to get a job. On what planet does this kid or anyone that’s a part of any National Guard Unit have that sort of security clearance?
Click to expand...
He’s part of Generation Dumbass
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and RDU VOL#14
#171
#171
Vol8188 said:
What did I say that was wrong and “contradicted that clearance”?

You can find posts by me dating back to when I was in Afghanistan on this website and multiple times I’ve stated I was a command post controller. All command post controllers have a ts clearance. I knew plenty a good man who got moved to other career fields due to an inability to obtain one
Click to expand...
Were you the one we used to poke fun at saying you were just a coffee boy while in Afghanistan?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and Vol8188
#172
#172
NorthDallas40 said:
From your clearance yearly training you’d remember that isn’t up to you to determine.

Another point that gets hammered home yearly on your training.
Click to expand...

NorthDallas40 said:
I don’t doubt your claim to a clearance, Never did. I’ll accept it at face value even.
Click to expand...

lol you 100% pretended with those two comments that I was lying to you. Face it, you followed me into the bathroom with a ruler and came up short.
 
#175
#175
Vol8188 said:
lol you 100% pretended with those two comments that I was lying to you. Face it, you followed me into the bathroom with a ruler and came up short.
Click to expand...
Nope. Did no such thing. In fact I refereed you to your government mandated yearly training on there being no “right” to anything. I had no reason to believe you didn’t have a clearance because as either you or someone else said they are fairly common even when they are sometimes denied.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top