Sandman 423
toting the rock
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2010
- Messages
- 7,301
- Likes
- 7,664
That could be on the user or the system. No way to really know for sureMy wife ordered 5 bananas. This is what we got. Total charge: 76 cents. #fightfor15.
View attachment 361423
On fruit by weight you select how many you want. So if you want five bananas you choose 5. Usually we get five. Sometimes they feel cute and give you five individual bananas. Sometimes they give you the five largest bananas they could find. Sometimes they give you eight for no real reason.That could be on the user or the system. No way to really know for sure
Still, you could have a brand new user on a system that isn't entirely clear. I've seen it happen in our operations and had to make the system changesOn fruit by weight you select how many you want. So if you want five bananas you choose 5. Usually we get five. Sometimes they feel cute and give you five individual bananas. Sometimes they give you the five largest bananas they could find. Sometimes they give you eight for no real reason.
That’s great. But it doesn’t work at the local Piggly Wiggly in a town with a population of 2-3000
RUSH ARCHIVE: This is pure, unadulterated socialism, which has never worked. That’s why I hope this company is a case study in MBA programs on how socialism does not work, because it’s gonna fail. … He’s chosen $70,000 as an arbitrary salary because he read that’s where people are happy. And he’s gonna find out… (laughing). It isn’t gonna take long because once everybody figures out they’re all making the same, no matter what they do, the slackers are gonna surface. It’s human nature! ….
It's an interesting thread to read
On the radio this morning they were talking about Frontier communications and their cuts to employee benefits. This after they went thru bankruptcy in the past year and paid our tens of millions in bonuses to execs. Businesses need to start thinking differently and so do consumersThis model can work, depends on the company and the services they provide. Much like government large corps do an awful job of spreading the money around.
It's absolutely relevant as an alternative. If businesses do these things and are rewarded by consumers then the need to create artificial govt floors goes awayThat's really cool. Unfortunately, I don't see that it is really relevant when talking about federally mandated minimum wages. He voluntarily took pay cuts to give employees higher salaries. And likely the employees who were beneficiaries of this already had the training required to be successful at their own job. It isn't like this guy is taking kids straight out of high school and giving them $70 k. To me, the minimum wage debate always comes back to economic mobility. Sh*t jobs don't pay the bills, but they develop skills, facilitate training, and nurture work ethic. In short, they are the foundation for a career. If the barrier to getting a job is above the foundation level, then people with undeveloped skills will not be economically mobile.
It’s not sustainable for small business in rural areas. Take any rural town in west or east TN. These business owners are not bringing in millions. You are serving a limited population base. You can’t double your payroll without bringing in more. So you have three options.Not going to work until it does
It's working for this company in Idaho and it didn't have to necessarily be $70k. You're just continuing the same argument made by people like Rush when this was originally rolled outIt’s not sustainable for small business in rural areas. Take any rural town in west or east TN. These business owners are not bringing in millions. You are serving a limited population base. You can’t double your payroll without bringing in more. So you have three options.
1. Lay off employees
2. Pass on the cost to customers (if this happens then everyone who didn’t get the wage boost is screwed)
3. Shut it down
It’s working for one company so it would work for everyone. Right. I don’t know what that company is but they probably serve more than just there local community.It's working for this company in Idaho and it didn't have to necessarily be $70k. You're just continuing the same argument made by people like Rush when this was originally rolled out
why should consumers think differently? They can do and buy what they wantOn the radio this morning they were talking about Frontier communications and their cuts to employee benefits. This after they went thru bankruptcy in the past year and paid our tens of millions in bonuses to execs. Businesses need to start thinking differently and so do consumers
It's absolutely relevant as an alternative. If businesses do these things and are rewarded by consumers then the need to create artificial govt floors goes away
Sure and they should be more aware and put their money towards businesses that value employees. Or at least businesses that match their values. I don't know many people whose values match what frontier has done in the past year. Plus their cust service suckswhy should consumers think differently? They can do and buy what they want
Pretty sure I posted that it's not a one size fits all solution. You're looking to reply with your anecdote without understanding the post.It’s working for one company so it would work for everyone. Right. I don’t know what that company is but they probably serve more than just there local community.
Take a grocery store. You are going to serve no more than your local town/area. You don’t have an online business and you’re not in the shipping business. You just simply sell groceries to your local town of 3000 people. There’s not a lot of room for growth in some businesses. Great for the ones that can. I hope they keep it up in Idaho, but it’s not a one size fits all.
Meh, I used to be of the mindset that we don't need a minimum wage, but I'm beginning to move away from that. The reason why is that we have foreigners and illegals that would undercut local/domestic labor.Personally, I don't believe in the concept of a minimum wage, period. In an ideal world, we would have an intelligent enough workforce to understand where they fall on the totem pole in terms of skill and market value. In addition to not crippling small businesses that can't afford to pay >$10/hour, it would also give larger businesses more incentive to actually compete for good workers, even the low skilled ones. (And yes, there are some excellent low-skilled workers who would stand out and be able to build themselves up over time).
This is one area that I wish the government would stay out of, particularly the federal government. $15/hour is a hell of a lot different in Northern Mississippi than it is in New York City.
Meh, I used to be of the mindset that we don't need a minimum wage, but I'm beginning to move away from that. The reason why is that we have foreigners and illegals that would undercut local/domestic labor.