- Joined
- Feb 2, 2005
- Messages
- 93,631
- Likes
- 65,227
The computer controls everything now though. And with federally mandated common architecture On Board Diagnostics the computer normally has a really good idea what is wrong.Sad fact is there are hardly any mechanics left, most "auto techs" can't figure out what's wrong without the computer telling them.
They couldn't pay me enough to spend 10 years in pound me in the ass prison. $1oo million (with taxes perpetually paid) isn't enough and after that it is just keeping score. I don't think you could find enough guys to take that kind of fall.That won’t work they will hire bosses to take a fall if they get caught . Make the fines so high that it gets the companies attention and a law saying all penalties must go to pay down the National debt only along with a public list of companies and its CEOs that have helped pay down that debt for the year .
My 22yo, recent grad, sheltered self learned a whole lot during that 6mos. I was there for almost 7yrs and was the only mgmt trainee who took the contractor up on his offer so this isn't really a new thing
You should see the idiots that the local vocational schools send us. How can someone graduate, take classes on carpentry, and not be able to read a tape measure?Herein lies one of the problems , it took a skilled tradesman ( several ) to teach you those things , we are running out of those and that knowledge to be passed down or around because our kids are being taught that everyone needs that degree instead of learning that skill .
How do we change that perception? I would rather help a young person set up a business as a tradesman than to help send a kid to college anymore. I feel that by helping to create workers that are debt free and providing a service other than pouring coffee at SBucks is a better use of my money. I would rather donate to MikeRoweworks than to UT anymore. Of course UT will never get any more of my money anyway, because of the woke leadership there. And I HATE that, because UT helped me to get where I am today and hopefully someday football will be fun again.Herein lies one of the problems , it took a skilled tradesman ( several ) to teach you those things , we are running out of those and that knowledge to be passed down or around because our kids are being taught that everyone needs that degree instead of learning that skill .
How do we change that perception? I would rather help a young person set up a business as a tradesman than to help send a kid to college anymore. I feel that by helping to create workers that are debt free and providing a service other than pouring coffee at SBucks is a better use of my money. I would rather donate to MikeRoweworks than to UT anymore. Of course UT will never get any more of my money anyway, because of the woke leadership there. And I HATE that, because UT helped me to get where I am today and hopefully someday football will be fun again.
You should see the idiots that the local vocational schools send us. How can someone graduate, take classes on carpentry, and not be able to read a tape measure?
The computer controls everything now though. And with federally mandated common architecture On Board Diagnostics the computer normally has a really good idea what is wrong.
I’ve got the MFG shop manuals (in CD form) for my Fords. They have flow charts you follow based on the codes you pull. It’s damn near idiot proof.
Got bad news for you on that 88-92 Ford. It still has a computer with diagnostics. It’s just pre OBDII. I think that was an EEC-III ?I'm going to by me a couple pre-electronic vehicles. Either a 88 - 92 7.3L Ford or a mid 90s Dodge (yeah I know) with the 12 valve Cummins and a 87-89 TJ with the inline 6. I can work on those.
Got bad news for you on that 88-92 Ford. It still has a computer with diagnostics. It’s just pre OBDII. I think that was an EEC-III ?
Like I said just buy a generic scan tool. It actually is easier to work on an OBDII vehicle once you understand the process.
I don’t see how they couldn’t as that would require two different engine management designs for the turbo fuel injected engine. And electronic engine management for waste gate and fuel delivery scheme is the only method you should be considering I’d submit its bullet proofI'm pretty sure the manual trannies don't have an ECM in those years.
I don’t see how they couldn’t as that would require two different engine management designs for the turbo fuel injected engine. And electronic engine management for waste gate and fuel delivery scheme is the only method you should be considering I’d submit its bullet proof
7.3L IDI Ford Diesel:
By increasing the bore of the 6.9 L to 4.11 inches, the 7.3 L IDI was born. It replaced the 6.9 L in 1988. Like its predeccesor, the 7.3 L was naturally aspirated, indirect injected. In 1993, a turbocharged version of the IDI was introduced, but short-lived since the IDI was replaced mid-1994 by the 7.3 L Power Stroke. The 7.3 L Power Stroke was turbocharged, direct injected, and featured computer controlled engine & injection management.
I’ll be damned the 6.9 and first 7.3 were mechanical fuel injection. Electronic control was introduced with the Power Stroke branding. Stupid Ford...I'm pretty sure the manual trannies don't have an ECM in those years.