The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

Yes.

The Fulton County case, under District Attorney Fani Willis, is where there is meat on the bone. I don't see Governor Brian Kemp interfering either. He is not exactly Trump's buddy. If Trump is ever convicted of a felony, that is where it will happen.
Not happening. The full call, not chopped up to suit a narrative, doesn’t do what you claim it does.
 
So what you're saying is golddiggers lie ?
Lied then, lying now.........
Her lawyer ( presidential material) went to prison.
Michael Cohen, the known serial liar said it never happened.
Sounds like oh Bragg ittt has a strong case. LoL
Same with Cohen, was his lawyer lying when he said no one in the Trump organization or Trump campaign knew. Was he lying then or now?
 
Here's the thing about the Trump indictment: There will be a trial, and as with most cases of all types in America, a jury will decide his innocence
or guilt. He'd better stop threatening the prosecutor and the judge or he's going to be getting more charges. I do think it very likely that we'll see other indictments against him, and fairly soon. There is the Georgia case related his attempts to subvert the election--and he's on tape trying to bully the state's top election official into "finding" him more votes, which would be felony vote fraud. And the special prosecutor has got two serious investigations going--one on the classified documents that Trump took and refused to return, and the other on the Jan. 6 insurrection.

Trump has always been a completely dishonest and corrupt man. FACT. He's always been a gangster, and he's gotten away with law-breaking and rule-breaking all his life. How anyone could still support or feel empathy for that man is way beyond me. We're talking about a man who was impeached twice. We're talking about a man who--as president!--lied blatantly for weeks about nonexistent vote fraud, tried to subvert a presidential election and then incited an attack on the U.S. Capitol that ultimately resulted in 9 deaths. There are nine people who would still be alive were it not for Trump--as president!--lying about vote fraud. And if you still want to believe there was vote fraud, you're beyond hope. He's a very bad character--as bad as we've ever had in politics in America. He's also a man who has a great affinity for dictators and who is quite fond on Putin War Criminal--America's chief adversay. That's treasonous.

If cops kill themself a month after a blm riot or did of a stroke the day after, do you blame blm or does that standard only apply to trump supporters.

If not, can you explain how you got to 9? I know of one death. And if she were on the left there’d be t shirts, university scholarships, and documentaries celebrating her
 
The President of the United States should not be pressuring a Secretary of State to "find votes" to help overturn the outcome of his own election defeat.

Trump's phone call with Brad Raffensperger was a very clear abuse of power.

If the Trump call to Raffensperger was abusive, I hope you don't meet up with a realtor or a especially a car salesman.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
The President of the United States should not be pressuring a Secretary of State to "find votes" to help overturn the outcome of his own election defeat.

Trump's phone call with Brad Raffensperger was a very clear abuse of power.

Do you believe trump was saying “make up votes that aren’t there” or “find missing ballots because I’m convinced I won”?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Disdain for the left began when Tipper Gore went bat sH1t crazy with censoring music. That took place Long before Trump was in the political picture Brother Luthenburg.
Disdain for the left began the minute there was something defined as the left. Same for the right.
You should know by now P Jaz, that it's all about the continuum (the amount of disdain).
 
When you say you need to remove the stain and that stain is others’ opinions then yes you’re viewing yourself to be the arbiter of truth whether you realize it or not.
I'm curious if you guys have ever interpreted anything correctly. I know over the past 3 days the PF is a collective 0 for 127.
 
Do you believe trump was saying “make up votes that aren’t there” or “find missing ballots because I’m convinced I won”?
It was pretty clear that he was saying it didn't matter to him. He was saying "one way or another, find the votes....period."
 
It was pretty clear that he was saying it didn't matter to him. He was saying "one way or another, find the votes....period."

You should probably check the context again. He literally said they had shredded his votes and he wanted them found
 

Attachments

  • 629A1345-B490-4B81-9FE6-864480F41702.jpeg
    629A1345-B490-4B81-9FE6-864480F41702.jpeg
    347.1 KB · Views: 10
That makes no sense. If everyone, including Daniels herself says it did not happen, then why the payment? There'd be no need to make a payment if no one was saying it occurred.

Honestly, people straining to claim that no affair occurred just look idiotic as no one in their right mind actually believes Trump's lame denials. Even Melania did not show up for the rally last night. She couldn't stomach his continued lies about it, nor could she stand there while he embarrassed the two of them even more.
Or maybe she just doesn't want to be in the political spotlight anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Please find a post where I talk about retribution to those racist, uneducated, gullible, fools.
And it is Trump who most disgusts me, but I do mostly blame the people who voted for him in the 2016 primaries.
You can thank the left for running Clinton then, it's precisely why we ended up with Trump.
 
You should probably check the context again. He literally said they had shredded his votes and he wanted them found
You would think that the President of the United States would be smart enough not to make a statement like the last one. Even if he didn't mean that he wanted votes "found", it certainly could be interpreted that way. Context would help, but his inability to string together two sentences not filled with crutch words and incomplete thoughts makes that near impossible.
 
I do not. But it is precisely that growing level of disdain for the left that I attribute to Trumpism.
That's what I always hated most about Trumpism.
It's a little like this.........I have little tolerance for people who have little tolerance of others.
I have strong prejudices against people who have strong prejudices of others.
I have little empathy for people who are not empathetic of others.

I get the surface level apparent contradiction.


So tolerance is only a one way street? There is a philosophical debate there. There are many things that groups don't tolerate. For instance respect for women, most people will agree that women should be respected. But sub groups within any larger groups show disrespect towards women both left and right. You give leeway or show tolerance for those you agree with but have distain for those on the other side who show disrespect.

The act of dressing up in drag is in itself a cheeky way of disrespecting females for instance. It's tongue in cheek of course much like a "dumb woman" joke. One is no more harmful than the other.

There are many other arguments and debates that can be had in regard to the concept of tolerance. But blanket tolerance is a very bad idea. Boundaries are very important for any society to be prosperous and remain that way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol737 and AM64
You would think that the President of the United States would be smart enough not to make a statement like the last one. Even if he didn't mean that he wanted votes "found", it certainly could be interpreted that way. Context would help, but his inability to string together two sentences not filled with crutch words and incomplete thoughts makes that near impossible.

I actually provided the context. He’s talking about votes he claims were shredded. Is it bad to want those found?

The media has 100% misrepresented the conversation

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/03/politics/trump-brad-raffensperger-phone-call-transcript/index.html
 

Attachments

  • D2BBDDAF-2679-4033-AE3D-C6C9DCD60273.jpeg
    D2BBDDAF-2679-4033-AE3D-C6C9DCD60273.jpeg
    347.1 KB · Views: 3
So tolerance is only a one way street? There is a philosophical debate there. There are many things that groups don't tolerate. For instance respect for women, most people will agree that women should be respected. But sub groups within any larger groups show disrespect towards women both left and right. You give leeway or show tolerance for those you agree with but have distain for those on the other side who show disrespect.

The act of dressing up in drag is in itself a cheeky way of disrespecting females for instance. It's tongue in cheek of course much like a "dumb woman" joke. One is no more harmful than the other.

There are many other arguments and debates that can be had in regard to the concept of tolerance. But blanket tolerance is a very bad idea. Boundaries are very important for any society to be prosperous and remain that way.
I agree with a good portion of that.
 

VN Store



Back
Top