The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

#3,978
#3,978
Vol8188 said:
I literally gave you the transcript that said he believes they’ve shredded votes and wants those votes found.

Tell me again, how’s that a crime?
Click to expand...
The transcript reads like a not so subtle threat to me. I now think Trump is even more guilty having just reread the transcript.
 
#3,980
#3,980
luthervol said:
It was pretty clear that he was saying it didn't matter to him. He was saying "one way or another, find the votes....period."
Click to expand...
Talk about not interpreting correctly…

Here, I’ll speak your language. This is 5% true and only when you take a few words out of context.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#3,983
#3,983
luthervol said:
I'm curious if you guys have ever interpreted anything correctly. I know over the past 3 days the PF is a collective 0 for 127.
Click to expand...
How am I misinterpreting? Enlighten me oh wise one. You said, “The stain in my mind would be mental inaccuracies, prejudices, misconceptions, the effects of rightwing propaganda.
My point all along is that I use agitation as a way to shake people's thoughts or minds like a washing machine uses agitation to clean clothes (or get the stains out).”

Since you’re the one judging these stains of “misconceptions”, “mental inaccuracies”, etc. that need washing out, cleaning or whatever you want to call it then you are holding yourself out to be the arbiter of truth. It’s really not a difficult concept. How you’re a teacher I’ll never know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and AM64
#3,984
#3,984
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, whodeycin85 and AM64
#3,986
#3,986
hUTch2002 said:
How am I misinterpreting? Enlighten me oh wise one. You said, “The stain in my mind would be mental inaccuracies, prejudices, misconceptions, the effects of rightwing propaganda.
My point all along is that I use agitation as a way to shake people's thoughts or minds like a washing machine uses agitation to clean clothes (or get the stains out).”

Since you’re the one judging these stains of “misconceptions”, “mental inaccuracies”, etc. that need washing out, cleaning or whatever you want to call it then you are holding yourself out to be the arbiter of truth. It’s really not a difficult concept. How you’re a teacher I’ll never know.
Click to expand...
luthervol said:
I'm no more the arbiter of truth than anyone else posting here. That accusation makes no sense.
Of course I think my opinions are right, if I didn't, I would change them. Maybe what I can do that some of you cannot is put opinions on a continuum.
If I say peperoni is the best pizza topping and you say it's sausage. Fine, that's pretty much 100% opinion - no issue.

If I say Heupel is a great coach for UT and you say he is horrible. 40% opinion -Still fine, but I think you're crazy.

If I say child pornography is bad and you say it is great. 1% opinion - Not so fine and I think you are crazy and evil.
Click to expand...
I'll repost my earlier answer.
Hell, the whole PF is people voicing their differing opinions and supporting why they think theirs is the better one.
(Outside of the echo chamber confirmations of "yea, we're of the same opinion so it must be right"; which now that I think of it may make up 85% of the posts - 99.9% if you take out the posts from a handful of non-conservatives)
so I guess, you're welcome for the much needed diversity of thought.
 
#3,987
#3,987
hUTch2002 said:
Talk about not interpreting correctly…

Here, I’ll speak your language. This is 5% true and only when you take a few words out of context.
Click to expand...
That's exactly what he was saying. I guess we'll let Raffensperger and a jury sort out the implied meaning.
 
#3,991
#3,991
hUTch2002 said:
Not happening. The full call, not chopped up to suit a narrative, doesn’t do what you claim it does.
Click to expand...
I have read the full transcript of the call ... and Trump is pressuring Brad Raffensperger into helping him overturn the outcome of his own election defeat.

In fact, that was the whole point of Trump making that call in the first place. If Trump had won the state of Georgia, no such call is ever made.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
#3,993
#3,993
luthervol said:
Had he just run as a D, he wouldn't have sniffed the nomination.

Which he knew, which is why he chose the base he did.
Click to expand...
If he ran on the following he would had:
Free college
Free housing
Free food
Unlimited abortions
Billions to Ukraine without any questions
Defund the police
Wide open southern border
Take orders from the CCP
Pick an unqualified VP because she’s black
Name a bunch of trannys to the administration
Promote further destruction of a once great country
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and AM64
#3,994
#3,994
AM64 said:
If the Trump call to Raffensperger was abusive, I hope you don't meet up with a realtor or a especially a car salesman.
Click to expand...
I didn't say that it was "abusive" ... I said that it was an "abuse of power." As President, Trump was trying to pressure and intimidate Raffensperger into assisting his efforts to overturn the outcome of his own defeat. It was inappropriate as hell.
 
#3,996
#3,996
Let me state again how much I respect how Kemp and Raffesperger, two conservative southern republicans, stood up to Trump.
If more republicans would have had that strength of character and backbone, we never would have had to deal with the Trump catastrophe.
 
#3,997
#3,997
OrangeBoro said:
If he ran on the following he would had:
Free college
Free housing
Free food
Unlimited abortions
Billions to Ukraine without any questions
Defund the police
Wide open southern border
Take orders from the CCP
Pick an unqualified VP because she’s black
Name a bunch of trannys to the administration
Promote further destruction of a once great country
Click to expand...
Nah, the left would have still rejected him.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top