The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

#4,777
#4,777
Septic said:
Again, that begs a much bigger question. Where is it?

Everybody in the room saw it. trump admitted to what it was.

Given Donny's propensity to obfuscate, scheme, hide and lie about the possession of classified documents - it's plausible to believe the war plan document he admitted to having is still being hidden.

Hell, if I were him - i definitely wouldn't want that seeing the light of day.
Click to expand...
Septic said:
Again, that begs a much bigger question. Where is it?

Everybody in the room saw it. trump admitted to what it was.

Given Donny's propensity to obfuscate, scheme, hide and lie about the possession of classified documents - it's plausible to believe the war plan document he admitted to having is still being hidden.

Hell, if I were him - i definitely wouldn't want that seeing the light of day.
Click to expand...
The person who recorded the audio couldn't even verify that those were the documents...I linked it above ..so no not everyone in the room...I argued this point with your brethren BB85 about needing a collaborating witness...if speculate there isnt one and that's why there is no charge related to said audio leak or documents
 
#4,778
#4,778
hog88 said:
Would that recording be admissible without the document in question in evidence or him being charged with being in possession of the document?
Click to expand...

It’s hard to say for certain at this point, but probably.

I think it’s relevant to the element of willfulness and out of court statements of the defendant are excluded from the definition of hearsay.

You could argue that it’s a “bad act” under rule 404(b), I guess, but as long as it is being used to show willfulness and not being used as evidence of bad character it should still get in under that.
 
#4,779
#4,779
RockyTop85 said:
It’s hard to say for certain at this point, but probably.

I think it’s relevant to the element of willfulness and out of court statements of the defendant are excluded from the definition of hearsay.

You could argue that it’s a “bad act” under rule 404(b), I guess, but as long as it is being used to show willfulness and not being used as evidence of bad character it should still get in under that.
Click to expand...

Thanks
 
#4,782
#4,782
RockyTop85 said:
It’s hard to say for certain at this point, but probably.

I think it’s relevant to the element of willfulness and out of court statements of the defendant are excluded from the definition of hearsay.

You could argue that it’s a “bad act” under rule 404(b), I guess, but as long as it is being used to show willfulness and not being used as evidence of bad character it should still get in under that.
Click to expand...

If nothing else, the audio completely undermines any defense that Donny had declassed or could retroactively declass documents.
 
#4,785
#4,785
Septic said:
I mean of course not, he'll plea before it gets to that point.
Click to expand...
I agree. I think he’s screwed regardless of the legality. At this point, it’s impossible to trust the government or Trump with regards to this case.
 
#4,788
#4,788
davethevol said:
I agree. I think he’s screwed regardless of the legality. At this point, it’s impossible to trust the government or Trump with regards to this case.
Click to expand...

Ha, ha: I'll trust the government....

Only seriously delusional MAGA trust the gangster--fact.
 
#4,791
#4,791
Well, it looks like the loony liberals didn't get Trump this time either. Due to DOJ misconduct.
You liberals can blame your Biden's DOJ Merrick Garland for the big f*** up for this.
The republicans has nothing to do w/the DOJ & the incompetent moron that runs the place.

 
#4,792
#4,792
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
Well, it looks like the loony liberals didn't get Trump this time either. Due to DOJ misconduct.
You liberals can blame your Biden's DOJ Merrick Garland for the big f*** up for this.
The republicans has nothing to do w/the DOJ & the incompetent moron that runs the place.

Click to expand...

Need to see the proof. Would be hilarious is true
 
#4,793
#4,793
BowlBrother85 said:
Oh, my God ...

The proof is in how closely page 6 of the memoir and the audio recording align with each other. During the audio recording from July of 2021, Trump was speaking to a room of people who were working on the Meadows memoir. The content of what he said on the recording ends up being published almost verbatim in the memoir. Both the book and the memoir state that Trump was given those documents by the Department of Defense.

... and Trump says himself that those documents have not been declassified. All of his publicly stated defenses are contradicted by reading the memoir and then listening to the recording in conjunction with each other.

So ... you are dead wrong. I have had to repeat this like 10 times now.
Click to expand...
So do you have proof? Heh heh heh.
 
#4,795
#4,795
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
Well, it looks like the loony liberals didn't get Trump this time either. Due to DOJ misconduct.
You liberals can blame your Biden's DOJ Merrick Garland for the big f*** up for this.
The republicans has nothing to do w/the DOJ & the incompetent moron that runs the place.

[/QUOTE

.
Click to expand...


Your source is sad. I mean really sad
 
#4,796
#4,796
ClearwaterVol said:
Your source is sad. I mean really sad
Click to expand...

Boo Hoo. It's sad. If it hurt your feelings that much to read, then go find another source you approve of then cry baby. Doesn't hurt my feelings if you find another source. More than likely it'll say the same thing. I love how you libs attack the source when it doesn't fit your narrative.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
#4,798
#4,798
Indictment about to be dismissed?

alternative-fact.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Septic
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top