The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

#9,378
#9,378
hog88 said:
Explain please.
Click to expand...

Because she's as shi**ty as Trump is, the implication is that if there were an easy way to cheat her out of an election as is alleged versus trump - they would have.
 
#9,381
#9,381
Septic said:
Because she's as shi**ty as Trump is, the implication is that if there were an easy way to cheat her out of an election as is alleged versus trump - they would have.
Click to expand...

She's in a rural district that votes heavily republican so no it would not be easy to rig the election to defeat her. Common sense people, use it some time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, SpaceCoastVol and loggervol
#9,386
#9,386
85SugarVol said:
What do you make of this one? Or is it too early.
Click to expand...
One thing I can comment on: there has been the usual level of mendacious commentary with this indictment. Some has been about the indictment criminalizing certain mundane acts like “sending a tweet.”

This is not true and anybody saying that should immediately be discarded. They don’t know what they’re talking about or they’re intentionally lying.

Shooting a gun is not a crime. Shooting a gun aimed at somebody’s face usually is.

Driving a car is not a crime. Driving a car to carry your friends away from a bank robbery could be evidence that you participated in a conspiracy.

Buying a reciprocating saw is not a crime. Buying a reciprocating saw that your brother then uses to chop up your parents’ murdered bodies could be evidence that you participated in a conspiracy.

Etc. etc.

Mundane acts are often evidence of a crime and in a conspiracy the prosecution has to establish acts in furtherance of the conspiracy and show some intent to carry out the object of the conspiracy. The acts described above and the acts in the indictment are acts in furtherance of a conspiracy, and other elements still have to be proven to establish a crime.

That’s just how criminal law works and has always worked. It’s one of the dumber things I’ve seen in service of Trump, which is saying something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 85SugarVol, BernardKingGOAT and volfanhill
#9,388
#9,388
hog88 said:
Explain please.
Click to expand...
Meaning she’s a Trumper not a Republican…if they rigged the election to get rid of Trump, they would have gotten rid of her. On a different note, people are saying the democrats rigged the election, what if it were RINOs? DJT has them by the balls and they want rid of him as much as the Dems do
 
#9,389
#9,389
Sin City Vol said:
Meaning she’s a Trumper not a Republican…if they rigged the election to get rid of Trump, they would have gotten rid of her. On a different note, people are saying the democrats rigged the election, what if it were RINOs? DJT has them by the balls and they want rid of him as much as the Dems do
Click to expand...
RINO’s rigged the election by voting against Trump. 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernardKingGOAT
#9,391
#9,391
Sin City Vol said:
Meaning she’s a Trumper not a Republican…if they rigged the election to get rid of Trump, they would have gotten rid of her. On a different note, people are saying the democrats rigged the election, what if it were RINOs? DJT has them by the balls and they want rid of him as much as the Dems do
Click to expand...

The election in GA couldn't have been rigged without support/help/cover from the Republican administration, not saying it was rigged but yes it would have taken assistance of some sort from the Republican Govenor.

As for MGTs district, that would have been a lot harder to do since it's a heavily R district so your supposition doesn't work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and Sin City Vol
#9,393
#9,393
PEPPERJAX said:
achievements-clapping.gif
Click to expand...
That's not enough applause.
 
#9,395
#9,395
BowlBrother85 said:
You have referred to some Republican officeholders as "RINO's."

Now, how can you do that, if you don't have an opinion on what constitutes a Republican to begin with?
Click to expand...
There are some conservatives in the Rep party (some/many are part of the DC establishment) along with many rinos in the party so I reject the party all together. True conservatives need to leave the Rep party. I don't care for the Paul Ryans, Boehners, etc
 
#9,396
#9,396
Sandman 423 said:
He is since he is actually a Democrat. At least until he had to face Hilary in a primary.
Click to expand...
If for some reason Hillary had decided not to run back in 2016, Trump might have jumped in there. Of course, we would have seen a totally different persona from Trump had this happened. He is smart enough to have played the moderate Democrat. Trump would have exuded the ideological traits needed to be loved by Democrats because as we all know he's about kowtowing to whomever will give him affirmation. It certainly would have been the easiest path for him to serve two terms. He wouldn't have had to make such controversial comments to win over Democrats in the primaries. I've never liked him regardless. Always knew he was a blowhard
 
#9,399
#9,399
hog88 said:
She's in a rural district that votes heavily republican so no it would not be easy to rig the election to defeat her. Common sense people, use it some time.
Click to expand...

But clearly the democrat 'riggers' are far too smart to let a little thing like that deter them. Thus far, they managed to rig State elections from coast to coast in such a way that there is no smoking gun, no rat with insider knowledge who was in on it... Nothing.

You think that these Joe Biden election riggers would let a little thing like her rural district deter them from bouncing that skank?

You're clearly not giving the 'riggers' the credit that they deserve.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top