The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
You're not listening
True. I don’t listen to misdirection, lies and exaggerations. That would include listening to anything Rump, OAN and the tinfoil hat brigade have to say. Three years and still no case where a judge agrees with you on anything meaningful.

It really is a tiresome discussion and a very simple concept. If they have proof, take it to somebody who will do something about it. I’m certain there is a conservative judge somewhere who would react to viable information. Get back with me when they do and then we can discuss it. Until then, I’m not wasting any more time with this nonsense.
 
True. I don’t listen to misdirection, lies and exaggerations. That would include listening to anything Rump, OAN and the tinfoil hat brigade have to say. Three years and still no case where a judge agrees with you on anything meaningful.

It really is a tiresome discussion and a very simple concept. If they have proof, take it to somebody who will do something about it. I’m certain there is a conservative judge somewhere who would react to viable information. Get back with me when they do and then we can discuss it. Until then, I’m not wasting any more time with this nonsense.

Oh sure... things are that simple. You're just reiterating all the pointless nonsense that you're friends are. I say, "Hey, the system is corrupt and broken." Then you say "If it's so corrupt then why haven't they outed themselves." That sums up every one of your arguments... if you want to call them that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
Oh sure... things are that simple. You're just reiterating all the pointless nonsense that you're friends are. I say, "Hey, the system is corrupt and broken." Then you say "If it's so corrupt then why haven't they outed themselves." That sums up every one of your arguments... if you want to call them that.
Still waiting……..
 
I'm saying the process in general is too expensive. Consider the he said/ she said game when TN football players were charged, kicked off the team, etc. A lot of people charged really aren't guilty; should they have to pay to remain free? How about when someone is found not guilty that the person or jurisdiction bringing the charges pays all the legal fees? When it's really blatant that the prosecuting body slipped one over on a grand jury that they are personally responsible?
Lawyers profit from crime. Doctors profit from sickness. Accountants profit from taxes. Plumbers profit from ish. You don't necessarily deserve to have whatever misfortune (or good fortune) brings you to them, but they deserve to profit from the fruits of their labor.
 
Last edited:
No you don't. That is clear.


You are gullible to an extreme.
 
Still waiting……..

Here's the thing. It doesn't matter if there was tampering with the votes or not. That's just a side discussion for me.

We now know for a fact that the FBI (50+ of them) lied about the Biden dealings with Ukraine and China. This was election interference, and makes the entire thing a sham. That is indisputable.
 
True. I don’t listen to misdirection, lies and exaggerations. That would include listening to anything Rump, OAN and the tinfoil hat brigade have to say. Three years and still no case where a judge agrees with you on anything meaningful.

It really is a tiresome discussion and a very simple concept. If they have proof, take it to somebody who will do something about it. I’m certain there is a conservative judge somewhere who would react to viable information. Get back with me when they do and then we can discuss it. Until then, I’m not wasting any more time with this nonsense.
It seems like such a simple concept.
 


You are gullible to an extreme.


You believed a made up Russian hoax for years. You were duped by your own cult. 🤣😂
 
True. I don’t listen to misdirection, lies and exaggerations. That would include listening to anything Rump, OAN and the tinfoil hat brigade have to say. Three years and still no case where a judge agrees with you on anything meaningful.

It really is a tiresome discussion and a very simple concept. If they have proof, take it to somebody who will do something about it. I’m certain there is a conservative judge somewhere who would react to viable information. Get back with me when they do and then we can discuss it. Until then, I’m not wasting any more time with this nonsense.
All true ... and you shouldn't ignore Donald Trump's track record of blaming fraud when things don't go his way in an election. At what point should it start to ring hollow? He has done this every time.


^^^^ This was when Trump blamed losing the 2016 popular vote to Hillary Clinton, on millions of illegal immigrants voting fraudulently. The popular vote doesn't even matter, but Trump can't help himself. He is so egotistical that he must blame fraud for every possible setback. This is just what Trump does, and his cult following supports him every single time on it. When do you quit running to the little boy crying wolf?
 
All true ... and you shouldn't ignore Donald Trump's track record of blaming fraud when things don't go his way in an election. At what point should it start to ring hollow? He has done this every time.


^^^^ This was when Trump blamed losing the 2016 popular vote to Hillary Clinton, on millions of illegal immigrants voting fraudulently. The popular vote doesn't even matter, but Trump can't help himself. He is so egotistical that he must blame fraud for every possible setback. This is just what Trump does, and his cult following supports him every single time on it. When do you quit running to the little boy crying wolf?

 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol
This is where we differ ...

I think Hillary Clinton was full of $hit. I think she is a pathological liar and a sore loser. She lost a free and fair election in 2016 and had sour grapes. She didn't take it to the same extremes as Trump in 2020, but she did make a fool of herself, nevertheless. I can call her out on that ...

No matter how many times Donald Trump pulls this act, his cult will be right behind him every step of the way. Does anyone think he could ever lose an election ... and NOT claim that he was cheated? Not if you're capable of being honest with yourselves.
 
Really? Because William Barr has de-bunked many of these allegations himself. He was Trump's Attorney General, and he is as far from being a Democrat as one can get. You are ignorant and just flat out wrong. There is a pitiful element to this. You are like a child.
Being complementary of Barr, knowing his connection of Esptein going back decades. Also, just happens to die with no video on his watch as AG. Forgive some if they don’t buy into Barr being honest.
 
Being complementary of Barr, knowing his connection of Esptein going back decades. Also, just happens to die with no video on his watch as AG. Forgive some if they don’t buy into Barr being honest.
I don't think he is honest at all. However, he is not a Democrat ... and he is not a Never-Trumper. For the most part, Barr carried water for Trump as a faithful minion, but he wouldn't be a party to Trump's efforts to overturn the election.
 
All true ... and you shouldn't ignore Donald Trump's track record of blaming fraud when things don't go his way in an election. At what point should it start to ring hollow? He has done this every time.


^^^^ This was when Trump blamed losing the 2016 popular vote to Hillary Clinton, on millions of illegal immigrants voting fraudulently. The popular vote doesn't even matter, but Trump can't help himself. He is so egotistical that he must blame fraud for every possible setback. This is just what Trump does, and his cult following supports him every single time on it. When do you quit running to the little boy crying wolf?
Stein should be indicted for questions the integrity of the voting.


“Stein, who won about 1.0 percent of the national vote, has said she wants a recount to guarantee the integrity of the U.S. voting system, a push that came after some computer scientists and election lawyers raised the possibility that hacks could have affected the results.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
I don't think he is honest at all. However, he is not a Democrat ... and he is not a Never-Trumper. For the most part, Barr carried water for Trump as a faithful minion, but he wouldn't be a party to Trump's efforts to overturn the election.
So you only trust Barr when it fits the narrative you want to pitch as truth.
 
This is where we differ ...

I think Hillary Clinton was full of $hit. I think she is a pathological liar and a sore loser. She lost a free and fair election in 2016 and had sour grapes. She didn't take it to the same extremes as Trump in 2020, but she did make a fool of herself, nevertheless. I can call her out on that ...

No matter how many times Donald Trump pulls this act, his cult will be right behind him every step of the way. Does anyone think he could ever lose an election ... and NOT claim that he was cheated? Not if you're capable of being honest with yourselves.

She claims she was cheated. But do you think her or any other dim would push for tougher voting laws and rules that would make elections more accountable and secure? Hell no! They want it to be easier to vote. They want you to be able to register to vote on your way in to vote. They want to send people unsolicited ballots whether they’re registered or not. They want to come around and collect votes from people who don’t give 2 s***s about voting. They love the mail in scam because it’s the least secure way to get the votes they need.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and Majors

VN Store



Back
Top