The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

[Majors]

She claims she was cheated. But do you think her or any other dim would push for tougher voting laws and rules that would make elections more accountable and secure? Hell no! They want it to be easier to vote. They want you to be able to register to vote on your way in to vote. They want to send people unsolicited ballots whether they’re registered or not. They want to come around and collect votes from people who don’t give 2 s***s about voting. They love the mail in scam because it’s the least secure way to get the votes they need.

Four years between elections, early voting and long hours at precincts. Even a request for a ballot if you choose that option….but yet voter suppression is running wild.

 

[BowlBrother85]

So you only trust Barr when it fits the narrative you want to pitch as truth.

No, I trust Barr when he has no reason to lie. Barr is a Republican who served as Attorney General under Trump. He wanted Trump to win. If William Barr had evidence that fraud had cost Trump the election, he wouldn't have kept it under wraps. Barr was Trump's guy.

 

[C-south]

Four years between elections, early voting and long hours at precincts. Even a request for a ballot if you choose that option….but yet voter suppression is running wild.

If you can’t make arrangements to vote once every 4 years you don’t need to vote.

 

[Majors]

If you can’t make arrangements to vote once every 4 years you don’t need to vote.

Only answer

 

[BowlBrother85]

She claims she was cheated. But do you think her or any other dim would push for tougher voting laws and rules that would make elections more accountable and secure? Hell no! They want it to be easier to vote. They want you to be able to register to vote on your way in to vote. They want to send people unsolicited ballots whether they’re registered or not. They want to come around and collect votes from people who don’t give 2 s***s about voting. They love the mail in scam because it’s the least secure way to get the votes they need.

She wasn't cheated. She had sour grapes, just as Trump does.

 

[Majors]

She wasn't cheated. She had sour grapes, just as Trump does.

She stated “illegitimate president” publicly not at a wine tasting with friends.

 

[BowlBrother85]

She stated “illegitimate president” publicly not at a wine tasting with friends.

And she was wrong for doing so. It was sour grapes. She lost a free and fair election.

 

[C-south]

She wasn't cheated. She had sour grapes, just as Trump does.

She said it was an illegitimate election. She cried about the EC. Maybe you can give your spin on what it means when someone says it was an “illegitimate election”.

 

[luthervol]

Says the one who fell for MSNBC and CNN media manipulation of false information as truth.

I know how they stack up against FOX.....continuums.
No news source is 100% trustworthy.....but they certainly are not all equally untrustworthy.

You guys desperately need to learn nuance and differentiation.

 

[C-south]

And she was wrong for doing so. It was sour grapes. She lost a free and fair election.

Lol. Typical you. You’re trying to claim she didn’t actually mean what she said. Nobody cares what you believe she said what she said MANY TIMES. She even said before 2020 not to let trump steal the election again.

 

[Majors]

And she was wrong for doing so. It was sour grapes. She lost a free and fair election.

Being one who likes to use the dictionary as fact, you know what the term “illegitimate” means. I don’t disagree with what you said. Seems she was inciting her base.

 

[BowlBrother85]

She said it was an illegitimate election. She cried about the EC. Maybe you can give your spin on what it means when someone says it was an “illegitimate election”.

LOL. I have already said that she was wrong. She is a pathological liar, who had sour grapes over losing a free and fair election. There was never any proof of wrongdoing at the polls or at ballot boxes.

Is there any doubt that if Trump loses again, that he will pull this same crap again? There shouldn't be. And once again, his cult will believe every single word of it.

 

[Majors]

I know how they stack up against FOX.....continuums.
No news source is 100% trustworthy.....but they certainly are not all equally untrustworthy.

You guys desperately need to learn nuance and differentiation.

Lead me to those retractions of 3 years of nightly coverage on Steele Dossier and Russian Collusion. I’ll wait for that trustworthy retraction piece.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Lol. Typical you. You’re trying to claim she didn’t actually mean what she said. Nobody cares what you believe she said what she said MANY TIMES. She even said before 2020 not to let trump steal the election again.

What the hell are you talking about? Like 5 or 6 times I have called her a liar, and said that she had sour grapes. That's not a defense of her. She was wrong for questioning the outcome of her defeat without anything to support that.

 

[Orangeburst]

She claims she was cheated. But do you think her or any other dim would push for tougher voting laws and rules that would make elections more accountable and secure? Hell no! They want it to be easier to vote. They want you to be able to register to vote on your way in to vote. They want to send people unsolicited ballots whether they’re registered or not. They want to come around and collect votes from people who don’t give 2 s***s about voting. They love the mail in scam because it’s the least secure way to get the votes they need.

well as stated several times..my aunt and uncle received 5 ballots..just discounting everything else, it does make me question how accurate our elections. MIBs, proprietary software for counting integers, why we get different results after recounting. The freaking 21st Century and it is just too complicated.

 

[luthervol]

Lead me to those retractions of 3 years of nightly coverage on Steele Dossier and Russian Collusion. I’ll wait for that trustworthy retraction piece.

Why would there be retractions? There was collusion. It was proven.

 

[Orangeburst]

anybody want to take a deep dive into the lies of the WaPo and NYT?
remember the bounty on US troops by the Russians..which hurt Trump in the election yet was walked back later by Biden? I am sure countless other examples can be displayed by a Dem media.

 

[Majors]

Why would there be retractions? There was collusion. It was proven.

Oh, to the tune of 3 years of full coverage to interfere/sway an election? Oh that’s right, look at cha boy! Send those retractions when you get a moment. Hard believing your media source is the good guys, while trusting the lies because they talk slow and sarcastically. I did you a solid and pulled from NPR to be fair and balanced.

 

[jwilliams]

Why would there be retractions? There was collusion. It was proven.

Huh?

 

[Majors]

She said it was an illegitimate election. She cried about the EC. Maybe you can give your spin on what it means when someone says it was an “illegitimate election”.

Yeah, but that’s different. She also destroyed evidence, but no big deal. Liberal white privilege.

 

[Majors]

Huh?

He’s a big Maddow fan.

 

[luthervol]

Huh?

www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/senate-russia-report-proves-trump-was-wrong-mueller-was-right-ncna1237743

Senate Russia report proves Trump collusion was very real. But do voters care?​

The Senate Intelligence Committee should be applauded for releasing the fifth and final volume of its investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

With over 200 witness interviews and roughly 1 million documents reviewed, the nearly 1,000-page report documents in detail the comprehensive campaign conducted by Russian President Vladimir Putin and his proxies to seek influence within President Donald Trump's campaign, help Trump win the 2016 presidential election and amplify polarization and division within American society.

Far from a hoax, as the president so often claimed, the report reveals how the Trump campaign willingly engaged with Russian operatives implementing the influence effort. For instance, the report exposes interactions and information exchanged between Russian intelligence officer Konstantin Kilimnik and then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort. According to the report, campaign figures “presented attractive targets for foreign influence, creating notable counterintelligence vulnerabilities.” (Manafort was later convicted of tax and bank fraud.)

 

[Majors]

Opinion | Why the Senate's Russia report should be one of America's biggest stories

Trump and Biden's contrasting positions on Russian interference in American elections are clear. Whether voters care about these differences, however, is not as obvious.

www.nbcnews.com

www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/senate-russia-report-proves-trump-was-wrong-mueller-was-right-ncna1237743

Senate Russia report proves Trump collusion was very real. But do voters care?​

The Senate Intelligence Committee should be applauded for releasing the fifth and final volume of its investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

With over 200 witness interviews and roughly 1 million documents reviewed, the nearly 1,000-page report documents in detail the comprehensive campaign conducted by Russian President Vladimir Putin and his proxies to seek influence within President Donald Trump's campaign, help Trump win the 2016 presidential election and amplify polarization and division within American society.

Far from a hoax, as the president so often claimed, the report reveals how the Trump campaign willingly engaged with Russian operatives implementing the influence effort. For instance, the report exposes interactions and information exchanged between Russian intelligence officer Konstantin Kilimnik and then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort. According to the report, campaign figures “presented attractive targets for foreign influence, creating notable counterintelligence vulnerabilities.” (Manafort was later convicted of tax and bank fraud.)

Opinion piece is just that. Might be part of your gullibility. Especially one written by a Russian ambassador appointed by Obama. No need to mention he worked for MSNBC…at least try next time.

 

[luthervol]

Opinion piece is just that. Might be part of your gullibility. Especially one written by a Russian ambassador appointed by Obama. No need to mention he worked for MSNBC…at least try next time.

lol.....His opinion piece contained a lot of facts proving collusion.

 

[Majors]

lol.....His opinion piece contained a lot of facts proving collusion.

Except Bob Mueller’s report said that was a lie and not an opinion. Rough night for you.