The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

#11,077
#11,077
whodeycin85 said:
These charges all stem from 2020 coorect?? It was 2 1/2 years to gather evidence and bring charges correct,?? Having been indicted before I was advised that I was allowed a similar amount of time ( and rame of charges) had I chosen to.
Click to expand...
Federal cases normally run in total from start to finish 4 to 4.5 years. Start is when the Feds start investigating end is when the trial, ruling & appeals are complete/exhausted. His lawyers were asking for a start date at the 5 year mark. Judge asked them to give a more reasonable date, BS excuse and picked one for them.

1. Trump can simply hire more lawyers
2. Use Technology to weed through all the documents turned over.
3. He will appeal if convicted.
4. The People are entitled to a Speedy Trial.

This date is probably not going to be pushed back. Rightfully so. Trump beats this and it will help him, a lost will not kill him but he is not electable anyway. Time to cut ties and look for another candidate.

You have been indicted State or Fed? Did it go to Trial? Was it this in depth?
 
#11,079
#11,079
C-south said:
If only there were other alternatives to unwanted pregnancies. I have no problem with the morning after pill or terminating a pregnancy due to rape or incest. It doesn’t have to be a nightmare when it comes to the illegal invaders. Lock down the border and deport all of them. The rest is typical looney lib hyperbole. Can you even define a woman?
Click to expand...
You don't know what I would like to do to them. At least the illegal ones. I don't get the define a woman thing. I know what a woman is and I am not worried about those that cannot distinguished what a woman is or is not.
It is a slight of hand stupid argument that a bunch of old people came up with to confuse the weak minded or the younger generation of misfits. Commonly referred to as a feint. If a person has to ask me to define what a woman is then I don't associate with that person. Not worth defining they will figure it out or somebody else will for them.
 
#11,080
#11,080
clarksvol00 said:
I don't know if Trump is guilty or not, but I find it amusing that his followers think that we can Make America Great Again by refusing to move forward with prosecutions when they inconvenience a politician.
Click to expand...

Why cant the prosecution wait until after the election? They waited this long, what is a few more months to ensure the election is not interfered with and is free and fair (or as free as it can be when the current administration is waging lawfare against the leading opposition candidate). Do we care about the sanctity of elections or not?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#11,083
#11,083
volgr said:
Why cant the prosecution wait until after the election? They waited this long, what is a few more months to ensure the election is not interfered with and is free and fair (or as free as it can be when the current administration is waging lawfare against the leading opposition candidate). Do we care about the sanctity of elections or not?
Click to expand...
I'm sure you'd feel the same way if Hunter and the Big Guy get indicted tomorrow. I, however, see no reason why someone should escape the consequences of their actions just because they are a politician and it is inconvenient for them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GordonC, Septic, CobbVol and 2 others
#11,084
#11,084
kiddiedoc said:
I had a few minutes and read through it. I don't think he's going to jail for telling people to "fight like hell." That's hilarious.

I guess we will see about the election stuff. Racketeering? That's a stretch.

The documents issue is stupid and definitely a political attack. No one give a crap.

Who knows? Maybe this will somehow lead to a viable alternate nomination for GOP candidate. I doubt it though, which means the next election will be even nastier than the prior one, which will be very sad for the country. I'm sick of it all.
Click to expand...
That actually seems like it has the most teeth. The prosecutor has alleged some real/serious crimes committed by Trump subordinates. If he had knowledge of their plans or asked them to undertake those acts, racketeering and conspiracy are reasonable allegations. I know this because I watched the sopranos and LA Law.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Septic
#11,085
#11,085
whodeycin85 said:
See this is why I can't see you serious. You sit o. A fence, throw crap at both sides with no solutions or feasible resolution...your just a Dem who can't admit who he really is
Click to expand...

So voting for the candidate I most closely align with is fence sitting?

LOL

You guys crack me up with your black and white worldviews. Since I'm not one of you, I'm the enemy. Lowrent thinking.
 
#11,086
#11,086
volgr said:
Why cant the prosecution wait until after the election? They waited this long, what is a few more months to ensure the election is not interfered with and is free and fair (or as free as it can be when the current administration is waging lawfare against the leading opposition candidate). Do we care about the sanctity of elections or not?
Click to expand...

Justice should wait on a private citizen's employment aspirations?

If trump were innocent, he'd be pushing for a speedy trial to own the DOJ and the libs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#11,087
#11,087
volgr said:
Trump is now the heavy betting favorite to win the GOP Primary. What is the harm in delaying his legal proceedings until after the election?

I keep hearing the media and politicians preach to me about how sacrosanct Democratic elections are so wouldnt it be appropriate to allow the leading challenger to campaign in a free and open election process?

What am I missing?
Click to expand...

Remember back after obama won and people questioned whether he met the qualifications? The answer was that it didn't matter, the people had spoken. Seems like if Trump should win and they failed to be timely and convict him by then, then all the lawsuits should go away for the same reason. If none of the DAs could get it together soon enough to get to trial before the election, too bad.
 
#11,088
#11,088
AM64 said:
Remember back after obama won and people questioned whether he met the qualifications? The answer was that it didn't matter, the people had spoken. Seems like if Trump should win and they failed to be timely and convict him by then, then all the lawsuits should go away for the same reason. If none of the DAs could get it together soon enough to get to trial before the election, too bad.
Click to expand...
Obama was indicted and awaiting trial during the 08 or 12 elections? Trump will be taken off the ballot because he has been indicted for these crimes?
 
#11,090
#11,090
bamawriter said:
I would think delaying a criminal prosecution in order to see whether or not the accused gains the power to pardon himself isn't how the system is supposed to work.
Click to expand...

I'm thinking trying a candidate during election season is tampering with an election, too. Seems if the charges were real enough to be a sure thing, they could have had their act together and been at trial before the next election.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85, StarRaider and jwilliams
#11,091
#11,091
AM64 said:
I'm thinking trying a candidate during election season is tampering with an election, too. Seems if the charges were real enough to be a sure thing, they could have had their act together and been at trial before the next election.
Click to expand...
Of course you do
 
#11,092
#11,092
AM64 said:
So does fani; makes you think they got the jobs and these cases for a reason ... like there was some judge shopping going on.
Click to expand...
So you're thinking Obama appointed a federal judge in DC years ago and somehow got a GA DA elected years later in order to f with Trump so biden could get re-elected?
 
#11,093
#11,093
AM64 said:
I'm thinking trying a candidate during election season is tampering with an election, too. Seems if the charges were real enough to be a sure thing, they could have had their act together and been at trial before the next election.
Click to expand...

They would have. It's so clear what they're doing it's kinda pathetic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#11,096
#11,096
AM64 said:
I'm thinking trying a candidate during election season is tampering with an election, too. Seems if the charges were real enough to be a sure thing, they could have had their act together and been at trial before the next election.
Click to expand...

If it's tampering with an election to try a candidate, then wouldn't choosing to run while being inveatigated be obstruction of justice?
 
  • Like
Reactions: VFFL@THE BEACH
#11,097
#11,097
clarksvol00 said:
I'm sure you'd feel the same way if Hunter and the Big Guy get indicted tomorrow. I, however, see no reason why someone should escape the consequences of their actions just because they are a politician and it is inconvenient for them.
Click to expand...

I would feel the same way if it were Biden. Face the consequences for what? What is so grave, in your opinion, that he must face the consequences for that would outweigh the importance of holding a free and fair election?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top