AM64
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2016
- Messages
- 28,519
- Likes
- 42,271
More appropriately, Ken PaxtonI can easily visualize Jack Smith in place of Roland Freisler (center) in this picture.
View attachment 602640
I can easily visualize Jack Smith in place of Roland Freisler (center) in this picture.
View attachment 602640
Former AG: Jack Smith's Special Counsel Appointment Is Unconstitutional
A former Attorney General says Jack Smith's appointment as special counsel is unconstitutional, so the Supreme Court must reject his petition against Donald Trump.1ft.io
Speedo may have a heart attack.Former AG: Jack Smith's Special Counsel Appointment Is Unconstitutional
A former Attorney General says Jack Smith's appointment as special counsel is unconstitutional, so the Supreme Court must reject his petition against Donald Trump.1ft.io
finished it for youThese people sound totally rational and reasonable
"Eighteen percent (18%) of Democrats support the harshest punishments for Trump, with 12% saying he should get life in prison if found guilty, four percent (4%) wanting him to be exiled and two percent (2%) in favor of the death penalty."
Democrats Want Harsh Punishment for Trump
Nearly half of American voters think former President Donald Trump is guilty of attempting to overturn the 2020 election, and Democrats in particular want to see Trump punished. Additionally, many support criminal punishment for members of the media who alleged that fraud tainted the 2020 outcome.www.rasmussenreports.com
Honestly, they don’t want to touch this with a 10 foot pole just as they didn’t want to wade into the lawsuit brought by Texas against Pennsylvania illegally changing their voting laws.The SCOTUS declined to rule on the matter of Trump’s immunity from suit and legal action for his actions while in office. They’re allowing it to move through the appeals process (lower court declared Trump not immune).
It may be appealed to the SCOTUS if the appeals court upholds the lower court ruling. If that happens, they’ll have to accept or decline the appeal.Honestly, they don’t want to touch this with a 10 foot pole just as they didn’t want to wade into the lawsuit brought by Texas against Pennsylvania illegally changing their voting laws.
I think they are hoping the election will happen before they make any decision. This is the kind of ruling that will tear a country apart forever no matter which way they go.It may be appealed to the SCOTUS if the appeals court upholds the lower court ruling. If that happens, they’ll have to accept or decline the appeal.
I agree they are hoping the election will happen before they are forced to make a decision.I think they are hoping the election will happen before they make any decision. This is the kind of ruling that will tear a country apart forever no matter which way they go.
I agree they are hoping the election will happen before they are forced to make a decision.
The SC's credibility as well as Bush's Presidency was damaged by the Gore-Bush results.
Just another Constitutional Institution that Trump has caused to come to the forefront.
Part of his plan of making America Great by ruining the country his way of which there is no part of the Govt holding the President accountable. His is Self Serving.
Neither Party gains any ground with Biden and Trump in charge.
The Republican Party has drifted into an area they have never been and does not know how to manage the Chaos Trump has created. In Contrary, the Democrats have lived in it, in some form or fashion since the 60s.
Just pathetic and a sad state of affairs.
Honestly, they don’t want to touch this with a 10 foot pole just as they didn’t want to wade into the lawsuit brought by Texas against Pennsylvania illegally changing their voting laws.