The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

#13,501
#13,501
VolTull said:
I know that there are folks who do not experience the reality that I do.. They see white, I see black. They claim they are right. I can't see how. It makes no sense.

I'm not surprised about this "splitting of the prism". I am surprised at the extent of the polarities. Reality is in the mind of the keeper.
Click to expand...
Are you impacts alt account?? You post similar before he gave into his left side and tried to be a centrist...btw your failing again
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
#13,502
#13,502
whodeycin85 said:
EMBEZZLEMENT is.not stepping outta bounds.....workplace retaliation is illegal as well if true...so now the head ofnthebcasw comprises her while office with corruption, with a paper trail mind you and your such a pathetic weak cuck that your willing to ignore it. Stfu
Click to expand...
But yet it does clear any of what Trump has done. Just because Willis is bad some of you think Trump is Vindicticated of all his wrong doings. Laughable thinking and typical thinking of Trump supporting cult followers. We got them so they can't get us Now, have fun with that. Call all the fouls and play own.
 
#13,503
#13,503
Sudden Impact said:
But yet it does clear any of what Trump has done. Just because Willis is bad some of you think Trump is Vindicticated of all his wrong doings. Laughable thinking and typical thinking of Trump supporting cult followers. We got them so they can't get us Now, have fun with that. Call all the fouls and play own.
Click to expand...
No what's being said the whole case against Trump is corrupted because of a corrupt DA. It bring in to question evidence, agreements made from the other deals in the case. So basically if the case is a rock solid slam dunk as you believe...then a dismissal and another clean DA can bring the charges...unless there really is no case and its political interference by a corrupt DA supporting a Corruot DnC. Again I repeat if the case is so solid then it should have no issue getting picked up by a New prosecutor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood and LibertyVol
#13,504
#13,504
whodeycin85 said:
No what's being said the whole case against Trump is corrupted because of a corrupt DA. It bring in to question evidence, agreements made from the other deals in the case. So basically if the case is a rock solid slam dunk as you believe...then a dismissal and another clean DA can bring the charges...unless there really is no case and its political interference by a corrupt DA supporting a Corruot DnC. Again I repeat if the case is so solid then it should have no issue getting picked up by a New prosecutor.
Click to expand...
In your opinion it does, the case is not corrupt; the prosecutors were corrupt. Does not change the evidence of what Trump did. Geez, get a life and quit chasing rainbows.
Has a new Prosecutor been even approached at this point? Time will tell but it is all speculation at the moment. Willis has not even been removed at this point.
2 fold witch hunt, Trump and Willis which is viable but does not change the fact that Trump did what he did. Nor should Willis continue.
2nd grade logic being used in this case of he did, she did when both should be punished.
I don't think it is a slam dunk, I think it has potential to be but giving what has happened does not change the facts. Put both in Jail.
 
#13,505
#13,505

Report: Fani Willis Will Refuse to Step Down After Corruption Allegations​


1706814493751.png

Fulton County Prosecutor Fani Willis will reportedly refuse to step down after allegations surfaced in recent weeks of corruption surrounding her probe into former President Donald Trump.

If Willis resigns or recuses herself from the case, it could effectively end the county’s prosecution of Trump or potentially delay the proceedings until after the presidential election. Republicans accuse Willis of interfering in the presidential election.

Sources familiar with Willis’ thinking told CNN that she will not step down, but will continue her prosecution despite the allegations. Willis has until Friday to respond to the allegations filed by co-defendant Mike Roman, who alleged Willis had an “improper” financial and romantic relationship with her top prosecutor, Nathan Wade.

CNN reported:

www.breitbart.com

Report: Fani Willis Will Refuse to Step Down After Corruption Allegations

Fulton County Prosecutor Fani Willis will reportedly refuse to step down after allegations of corruption surfaced surrounding her probe into former President Donald Trump.
www.breitbart.com www.breitbart.com
Click to expand...

 
#13,506
#13,506
Sudden Impact said:
In your opinion it does, the case is not corrupt; the prosecutors were corrupt. Does not change the evidence of what Trump did. Geez, get a life and quit chasing rainbows.
Has a new Prosecutor been even approached at this point? Time will tell but it is all speculation at the moment. Willis has not even been removed at this point.
2 fold witch hunt, Trump and Willis which is viable but does not change the fact that Trump did what he did. Nor should Willis continue.
2nd grade logic being used in this case of he did, she did when both should be punished.
I don't think it is a slam dunk, I think it has potential to be but giving what has happened does not change the facts. Put both in Jail.
Click to expand...
Are you special???
You have a prosecutor who is now under investigation for the crime of embezzlement..which is a crime of lieing and hiding and stealing...so if a person whom is accused of that would you put it past them to alter evidence, lose evidence, lie just to win a case that would bring them more money for them to embezzle..I used to think you were at least semi intelligent but i guess your TDS is too deep. So the case isnt a slam dunk, which means the evidence isnt strong, and you have a corrupt prosecutor...take trump out and replace him is a black man..you'd be calling for a dismal like a typical SJW..so sad
 
  • Like
Reactions: LibertyVol
#13,508
#13,508
whodeycin85 said:
Are you special???
You have a prosecutor who is now under investigation for the crime of embezzlement..which is a crime of lieing and hiding and stealing...so if a person whom is accused of that would you put it past them to alter evidence, lose evidence, lie just to win a case that would bring them more money for them to embezzle..I used to think you were at least semi intelligent but i guess your TDS is too deep. So the case isnt a slam dunk, which means the evidence isnt strong, and you have a corrupt prosecutor...take trump out and replace him is a black man..you'd be calling for a dismal like a typical SJW..so sad
Click to expand...
Alleged embezzlement. Trump Alleged insurrecatists, document hog, defamation, grifter, well you should get the picture. His list is long but all you can do is deflect. Trump is just as guilty as she is. Funny how deflection works. She may lose her job, but Trump will wear Orange and not because he is a Vol Fan.
 
#13,511
#13,511



Julie Kelly 🇺🇸
@julie_kelly2
·
3h
Trump D.C. trial drops off court’s March calendar.

This is why media is pressuring DC circuit to rule on immunity issue—everyone was preparing for historic March 4 trial in Washington and now that’s gone...

March 1 hearing in Florida as Judge Cannon wants an update from Jack Smith about status of DC trial.

Jay Bratt claimed DC trial would be resolved before classified docs case went to trial on May 20

Cannon was doubtful. This should be fun.

Even if appellate court files a decision tomorrow upholding Chutkan’s denial of immunity, Trump can ask for en banc decision by DC circuit. Obama heavy court will deny, prompting cert to SCOTUS. If SCOTUS accepts, earliest it could be resolved is end of June (end of term)

This backdates J6 trial 6 months from time Chutkan put pretrial proceedings on hold. She has said all suspended time will be accounted for in preparation for trial. So DC trial looks unlikely before election.

If SCOTUS fast tracks—also unlikely—it still appears impossible this trial happens before November. And SCOTUS decision on 1512c2, half of Smith’s indictment, could prove fatal to case anyway.

==================================


Dr Vincent Sativa 🇺🇸
@The_Weed_Shop

Some have speculated that the removal of the case from the docket may be related to concerns about the judge's impartiality. In a recent motion, Trump's legal team argued that Judge Chutkan should recuse herself due to comments she made in previous sentencing hearings related to the January 6th, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol.

However, others have suggested that the removal of the case from the docket may be due to the ongoing legal battle over Trump's claim of presidential immunity from criminal prosecution. The case has been on hold since December 2023, when Trump filed an appeal of the charges against him.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol and whodeycin85
#13,513
#13,513
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol and whodeycin85
#13,514
#13,514

Willis Acknowledges ‘personal relationship’ with top Trump Georgia prosecutor​


1706899213837.png

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis (D) acknowledged developing a “personal relationship” with the top prosecutor in former President Trump’s Georgia criminal case in a new court filing Friday, but said it was no reason for her to step aside.

thehill.com

Willis acknowledges ‘personal relationship’ with top Trump Georgia prosecutor

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis (D) acknowledged developing a “personal relationship” with the top prosecutor in former President Trump’s Georgia criminal case in a new court filin…
thehill.com thehill.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol, jmacvols1, CobbVol and 1 other person
#13,515
#13,515
Franklin Pierce said:

Willis Acknowledges ‘personal relationship’ with top Trump Georgia prosecutor​


View attachment 616982

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis (D) acknowledged developing a “personal relationship” with the top prosecutor in former President Trump’s Georgia criminal case in a new court filing Friday, but said it was no reason for her to step aside.

thehill.com

Willis acknowledges ‘personal relationship’ with top Trump Georgia prosecutor

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis (D) acknowledged developing a “personal relationship” with the top prosecutor in former President Trump’s Georgia criminal case in a new court filin…
thehill.com thehill.com
Click to expand...

You may have a problem and tainted a case when you’re bonking the person you appointed to prosecute the individual, take vacations on the tax payer's dime with this person, and fire a whistleblower in the process.

Now in Fulton County, anything is possible and they may build her a statue next to Centennial Olympic Park.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland, davethevol, whodeycin85 and 1 other person
#13,516
#13,516
CobbVol said:
You may have a problem and tainted a case when you’re bonking the person you appointed to prosecute the individual, take vacations on the tax payer's dime with this person, and fire a whistleblower in the process.

Now in Fulton County, anything is possible and they may build her a statue next to Centennial Olympic Park.
Click to expand...
try explaining that to these TDS ridden idiots who cant comprehend that a corrupt DA taints the entire case...if the case is solid then another prosecutor should be able to get a new trial with ease.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol
#13,521
#13,521
jmacvols1 said:



Julie Kelly 🇺🇸
@julie_kelly2
·
3h
Trump D.C. trial drops off court’s March calendar.

This is why media is pressuring DC circuit to rule on immunity issue—everyone was preparing for historic March 4 trial in Washington and now that’s gone...

March 1 hearing in Florida as Judge Cannon wants an update from Jack Smith about status of DC trial.

Jay Bratt claimed DC trial would be resolved before classified docs case went to trial on May 20

Cannon was doubtful. This should be fun.

Even if appellate court files a decision tomorrow upholding Chutkan’s denial of immunity, Trump can ask for en banc decision by DC circuit. Obama heavy court will deny, prompting cert to SCOTUS. If SCOTUS accepts, earliest it could be resolved is end of June (end of term)

This backdates J6 trial 6 months from time Chutkan put pretrial proceedings on hold. She has said all suspended time will be accounted for in preparation for trial. So DC trial looks unlikely before election.

If SCOTUS fast tracks—also unlikely—it still appears impossible this trial happens before November. And SCOTUS decision on 1512c2, half of Smith’s indictment, could prove fatal to case anyway.

==================================


Dr Vincent Sativa 🇺🇸
@The_Weed_Shop

Some have speculated that the removal of the case from the docket may be related to concerns about the judge's impartiality. In a recent motion, Trump's legal team argued that Judge Chutkan should recuse herself due to comments she made in previous sentencing hearings related to the January 6th, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol.

However, others have suggested that the removal of the case from the docket may be due to the ongoing legal battle over Trump's claim of presidential immunity from criminal prosecution. The case has been on hold since December 2023, when Trump filed an appeal of the charges against him.
Click to expand...

If you're able, go out and take a walk man. Get some sunshine. No reason to seek misery every day. Life is pretty damn good away from it
 
#13,525
#13,525
volgr said:
Click to expand...

Though Trump has long portrayed the Biden White House’s involvement in the process as a sign of sinister politics, Smith’s team described it as limited, necessary and well-known to Trump’s aides, who did not protest.


So now he’s beginning to admit that Biden’s White House has been involved in this despite all the denials from the onset.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CagleMtnVol, LibertyVol and BreatheUT
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top