The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

#13,753
#13,753
lawgator1 said:
I don't buy that. I think world leaders have a much lower opinion of the US if Trump is President than pretty much anyone else. The one exception being Putin, who clearly sees that as to his advantage.

If it came down to it I'd really struggle to vote for Biden. I might have to just to try to stop Trump. But I'm in Florida my vote is likely irrelevant and so I might not vote at all, in disgust at the Dems for failing to nominate someone better.

That's what I did with the gubernatorial race here between DeSantis and Charlie Crist. Could not vote for either, out of principle.

Now, if voted in Florida mattered, I'd vote for a dead skunk over Trump. Heck, I'd probably contribute to the skunk's campaign.
Click to expand...
Did you vote for the closeted gay guy that passed out with a drugged up male hooker for governor?
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider, LibertyVol and BernardKingGOAT
#13,754
#13,754
lawgator1 said:
I don't buy that. I think world leaders have a much lower opinion of the US if Trump is President than pretty much anyone else. The one exception being Putin, who clearly sees that as to his advantage.

If it came down to it I'd really struggle to vote for Biden. I might have to just to try to stop Trump. But I'm in Florida my vote is likely irrelevant and so I might not vote at all, in disgust at the Dems for failing to nominate someone better.

That's what I did with the gubernatorial race here between DeSantis and Charlie Crist. Could not vote for either, out of principle.

Now, if voted in Florida mattered, I'd vote for a dead skunk over Trump. Heck, I'd probably contribute to the skunk's campaign.
Click to expand...

WTF did anything i said have to do with Trump?

Ya may wanna seek help!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst, Zues1 and BernardKingGOAT
#13,756
#13,756
White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson heard the gangster say this to his Chief of Staff, Mark Meadows, after
the '20 election, per her testimony to the Jan. 6 committee. Tells us all we need to know.
 
#13,758
#13,758
Nick Sortor
@nicksortor


🚨 JUST IN: After Fani Willis REFUSED to be served a subpoena from the House Judiciary Committee, the US Marshals Service intervened and HAND DELIVERED the subpoena to Willis

This will FORCE her to go testify before the judiciary committee related to her apparent misuse of federal funds to prosecute President Trump

WILL REPUBLICANS ACTUALLY HOLD FANI WILLIS ACCOUNTABLE?

(Story via @henryrodgersdc & @DailyCaller- link below)

dailycaller.com

EXCLUSIVE: Fani Willis Forced US Marshals To Hand-Deliver Subpoena From House Judiciary Committee

Fani Willis refused to take service of a subpoena over email, requiring the U.S. Marshals Service to hand deliver it to her, the Daily Caller has learned.
dailycaller.com dailycaller.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: norrislakevol and davethevol
#13,761
#13,761

EXCLUSIVE: Fani Willis Forced US Marshals To Hand-Deliver Subpoena From House Judiciary Committee​


1707534639290.png

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis failed to take service of a House Judiciary Committee subpoena over email, requiring the U.S. Marshals Service to hand deliver it to her personally, the Daily Caller has learned.

The House Judiciary Committee sent a subpoena to Willis on Feb. 2 for documents germane to her potential misuse of federal funds related to her indictment of former President Donald Trump. Willis did not accept the subpoena after it was emailed to her, causing the U.S. Marshals Service to have to serve the subpoena to her themselves, a source familiar with the matter told the Daily Caller.

The Daily Caller was able to independently verify that the U.S. Marshals Service had to serve the subpoena to Willis.

“Why wouldn’t Fani Willis just accept service like everyone else? Making the U.S. Marshal’s Service use taxpayer money to do this is a complete waste of time and resources. But we shouldn’t be surprised when it comes to her office,” a source familiar with the situation told the Daily Caller.

dailycaller.com

EXCLUSIVE: Fani Willis Forced US Marshals To Hand-Deliver Subpoena From House Judiciary Committee

Fani Willis refused to take service of a subpoena over email, requiring the U.S. Marshals Service to hand deliver it to her, the Daily Caller has learned.
dailycaller.com dailycaller.com




​
 
  • Like
Reactions: norrislakevol
#13,767
#13,767
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol
#13,770
#13,770
whodeycin85 said:
Isnt the main dispute regarding whether he was allowed to have them as a former POTUS?? AND how declassification for a PoTUs works...
Click to expand...

No, the issue was not that Trump had them. It's that he conspired to keep them after he was told to give them back and then hid them from the federal authorities.

Bruce Pearl can tell you that the cover up is sometimes worse than the crime.

If Donny weren't such a megalomanic, he wouldn't have caught those charges.
 
#13,772
#13,772
#13,774
#13,774
Septic said:
No, the issue was not that Trump had them. It's that he conspired to keep them after he was told to give them back and then hid them from the federal authorities.

Bruce Pearl can tell you that the cover up is sometimes worse than the crime.

If Donny weren't such a megalomanic, he wouldn't have caught those charges.
Click to expand...
But if it ruled he was allowed to keep then then there is no cover up correct?
 
#13,775
#13,775



KanekoaTheGreat
@KanekoaTheGreat

🚨BREAKING: The lawyer attempting to subpoena Trump prosecutors Fani Willis and Nathan Wade highlights that Wade submitted two different sworn statements in separate courts regarding his inappropriate relationship with Willis.


In May 2023, Wade filed in divorce court that he didn't have any other relationships.

However, in a recent sworn affidavit filed in the Trump case, both Willis and Wade stated they had been in a relationship since 2022.

When accusations about their improper relationship surfaced, Wade amended his divorce court filing, citing the Fifth Amendment.

"We've got two declarations in two different courts, both sworn and filed with the court, that say something completely different," the lawyer stated.

"We've got a 2023 filing under oath by Mr. Wade, stating he didn't have a relationship."

"Then we've got a filing stating he did have one starting in 2022."

"And then, once that came about, he fixed the incorrect affidavit that was filed back in 2023."

"So, we definitely have a conflict judge."

 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top