The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

It didn't but it makes your "objective truth" post laughable bs. Trump voters cheered the idea he wanted his opponents locked up. He didn't do it because they were friends but he knew the ignorant would eat it up. How many times did you chant it?

And Biden voters are cheering the current administration for actually trying to lock up its opponent.
 
It didn't but it makes your "objective truth" post laughable bs. Trump voters cheered the idea he wanted his opponents locked up. He didn't do it because they were friends but he knew the ignorant would eat it up. How many times did you chant it?
Idk how many times..again what were his Actions??? Because actions are what matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT
Idk how many times..again what were his Actions??? Because actions are what matter.

The whole “lock her up” thing was dumb. Trump knew that wasn’t happening but encouraged the chants anyway. His treating the campaign like a pep rally without providing any substance really turns me off.
 
The whole “lock her up” thing was dumb. Trump knew that wasn’t happening but encouraged the chants anyway. His treating the campaign like a pep rally without providing any substance really turns me off.

Plus Trumps whole underestimation of the “lock em up” situation was mind bogglingly stupid, since he wasn’t really interested or willing to try to charge or put any of his opponents behind bars while his opponents on the other hand have proven to have absolutely no problem whatsoever in trying to lock him up or bring him down by any means necessary. It was a major miscalculation on his part.
 

 
I don’t know anything about New York law and wasn’t about to watch a two hour video.

My only thoughts on the NY Civil case has been that there doesn’t have to be a victim. I assumed that argument had been presented as a prudential argument/evidence of politicization rather than a legal argument.

Looking at it in a legal framework:
The statute doesn’t appear to require an injured party.
The constitution doesn’t prohibit victimless crimes, I can’t imagine there’s any restriction on non-criminal sanctions for conduct that could but has not yet caused any harm, when there is a legitimate state interest in prohibiting the conduct.
There may be some creative constitutional arguments, state constitutional arguments, or statutory/common law arguments that I’m not aware of. If I had the inclination to spend 24 hours riling those things out, YouTube would not make the cut for how I would use my time (although this guy went to a decent school, seems not to have appeared on infowars, and is barred in the same state so he’s a big improvement over some of the others, on paper).
There are constitutional limits on fines and punitive damages but I’ve stayed out of arguing about whether any of the ones levied against Trump will be reduced because I don’t have anything more than a vague opinion.
Sorting this out it would be billable hours for your work. Just make sure you get your $$$$ up front --- 24 hours @ $500 per hour with expenses = $12,000. Just make sure you get the money up front. MAGA supporters seem to think this is free of charge.
 
No, that's not what his peers do. That is a lazy non-defense. They don't inflate sizes of their homes by 3x, they don't create fake operating income statements to try to fool appraisers, they don't double count lease payments to justify better cap rates, they don't take market appraisals and increase them by 350%.

And don't trust me, his accountants, CFO and accounting consultants admitted to all of it at trial...

It's all there in the ruling.

That just isn't accurate. His peers have already said this is the way business is done in NYC. In the video I linked, an attorney in NYC said this is how business is done. If what you say is accurate, a bank would have sued Trump, instead they testified FOR him.
 
He was beaten in a fair fight in 2020 and he and his idiot worshipers responded as we have seen...........
So your question is nonsensical.
We have an American populace where 30% look at Trump as the answer.....that's a national malignancy.
Until it is properly addressed, everything else is kind of secondary.
😂 🤡

The entire Democrat party is a cancer
 
That just isn't accurate. His peers have already said this is the way business is done in NYC. In the video I linked, an attorney in NYC said this is how business is done. If what you say is accurate, a bank would have sued Trump, instead they testified FOR him.

Nope. You aren't accurate.

Not one peer has said they created fake income statements to give to an appraiser.

Not one.
 
You're kidding, right? That has zero to do with it.

Apple, Facebook, Google, Nvidia - 4 of the 5 most valuable companies in the world. All CA based.

Go back to my Hilton comment above. There is a reason that most of the Company owned hotels was in NY and CA and it wasn't because they liked dealing with risk.
 
Of course he signed something vs being bankrupted by you scum in court. This isnt proof you are right, it is proof your side is pathetic scum.
What? He was talking about signing the false statement saying Trump had won. Try reading the article.
 
What? He was talking about signing the false statement saying Trump had won. Try reading the article.

No crap, you loon. Do you not remember the multitude of of ongoing lawsuits when elector slate deadlines hit? Trump very well could have been the winner by 1/6. Again, these people were signing alternate elector slates to try and FOLLOW the law, not skirt it. Everyone knew who the real electors were and who the alternate electors were. Again, if you support this action against your fellow citizens, you are pathetic scum.

As much as I detest leftists like yourself, I wouldn't support you being prosecuted for doing what these people did. It is beyond crazy that people on your side are cheering this on.
 

VN Store



Back
Top