The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

You might have one there.

Were the repayments the same? I honestly don’t know.

Did they pay “on time” or after they were “caught”?

Hunter willfully failed to file/pay. He wasn't caught as much by the IRS as he needed to be caught up on tax filings for alimony/child support cases....
 
Hunter willfully failed to file/pay. He wasn't caught as much by the IRS as he needed to be caught up on tax filings for alimony/child support cases....
I’ve read your posts on 63(12) and the fact that there is no requirement for harm, only a pattern - and Trump was indeed at fault there.

But as to the actual repayment - was it not pretty much standard and by the book?
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
Hunter lied on his taxes but paid them back with interest. No one got hurt and the govt was made whole. Assume no penalty there either.

He didn't repay anything until 2 years after the investigation began, during the 2020 campaign season. Even then "he paid them back" isn't really accurate. His attorney, Kevin Morris, loaned him the money and he is supposed to pay his attorney back by 2025.

When you say no penalty there either, I think you're missing the actual heart of the matter with Hunter. It's not taxes or gun charges (I wouldn't care if they dropped both) but rather his failure to register as a foreign agent and the fact that Joe received a cut of that money.

 
He didn't repay anything until 2 years after the investigation began, during the 2020 campaign season. Even then "he paid them back" isn't really accurate. His attorney, Kevin Morris, loaned him the money and he is supposed to pay his attorney back by 2025.

When you say no penalty there either, I think you're missing the actual heart of the matter with Hunter. It's not taxes or gun charges (I wouldn't care if they dropped both) but rather his failure to register as a foreign agent and the fact that Joe received a cut of that money.


Semantics aside, many of the same people who said that Trump did nothing wrong by lying on a form are the same ones who wanted Hunter arrested for lying on a gun form

And vice versa. Those that said Hunter was targeted for political reasons are the same ones who are cheering this one....
 
Semantics aside, many of the same people who said that Trump did nothing wrong by lying on a form are the same ones who wanted Hunter arrested for lying on a gun form

And vice versa. Those that said Hunter was targeted for political reasons are the same ones who are cheering this one....

Some people have no real standards. Like I said, I have no interest in the gun charges. I think even crackheads should have constitutional rights.

lol at “Hunter was targeted for political reasons”. Hunter is not in federal prison for multiple crimes due to political reasons. He was targeted because he worked as a foreign agent for years and never paid his taxes while making millions

Trump would have never went to trial for doing something everyone does if not for politics. Hunter is only out of prison due to politics. Those aren’t the same
 
I stated plainly a limited opinion about the case, gave a detailed explanation of my reasoning, and pointed out the areas where my knowledge could fall short.

I’m not sure why that’s triggering for you.

It's not triggering, your gas light act is a little hard to take at times though. In 10 minutes, a NY attorney could help clear up some of your limited knowledge but then if you did that you couldn't gas light.
 
Please share the crimes he admitted to with a well sourced link.

Mark Levin has described the legally clueless with derangement syndrome. I thought of you. If I had the clip I'd share it.

You've played this Republican voter thing up to a tee. It's like pulling teeth to get you to admit Biden is an incompetent, crooked, racist fool. It basically exposes you.
You are so wrong but, if calling someone TDS is your only defense and offense then you really have serious issues with reality. You are apparently brainwashed, man crushed and clearly have a heart for self-serving narcissist.

What's more, Biden is just as unfit for the position and Trump is a gimmick.

You using Mark Levin is like me using Turbovol to make my point. Not happening!

It seems that Gofundme pages and Tennis shoe sales are politics to you. Simply immature Kid stuff.

Comment when you are more serious. You are entitled to your opinion even though you are dead wrong. Just remember desperate people say and do desperate things and seldomly use facts in disagreements.

Edit: Trump is the Mr Haney of Green Acres and the Al Capone of the underworld.
I guess that means you have THC syndrome.
 
Last edited:
You are so wrong but, if calling someone TDS is your only defense and offense then you really have serious issues with reality. You are apparently brainwashed, man crushed and clearly have a heart for self-serving narcissist.

What's more, Biden is just as unfit for the position and Trump is a gimmick.

You using Mark Levin is like me using Turbovol to make my point. Not happening!

It seems that Gofundme pages and Tennis shoe sales are politics to you. Simply immature Kid stuff.

Comment when you are more serious. You are entitled to your opinion even though you are dead wrong. Just remember desperate people say and do desperate things and seldomly use facts in disagreements.

Edit: Trump is the Mr Haney of Green Acres and the Al Capone of the underworld.
I guess that means you have THC syndrome.

Man you are possessed. I could spend the time to dispute your remarks but this topic is like your last frontier in life. It means that much to you.
 
It's not triggering, your gas light act is a little hard to take at times though. In 10 minutes, a NY attorney could help clear up some of your limited knowledge but then if you did that you couldn't gas light.
Lol.

So, because I don’t know whether this random YouTuber is right or wrong, I should just believe what he says? That’s how you use the internet?

Actually, that checks out.

I’ve stated my opinion, it’s strong in certain areas and not in others. I’ve identified those strengths and weaknesses so that I’m not misrepresenting a guess as fact. Watching YouTube would make me no more or less confident in my opinion, because I don’t know anything significant about this lawyer or his credibility. I think I’ve explained what I would need to do to feel more confident about my opinion. Watching his video might give me some things to look into, but I’m not going to look into them and I also think I explained why I’m not willing to do that.

I don’t even know what more you want or what you’re still crying about at this point.
 
This random YouTuber, while admitted to the NY bar, runs a debt collection agency and is a far-right Trump cheerleader...

This is the akin to a chiropractor performing brain surgery..

This isn't to mock debt collecting but to point out its about as far from the technical accounting and financial issues in this case as you can get..
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
Lol.

So, because I don’t know whether this random YouTuber is right or wrong, I should just believe what he says? That’s how you use the internet?

He is reading from the Judge's 90 page ruling and offering his opinion from having years of experience in NYC Courts. It is a10 minute watch, I even time stamped linked it.

Good grief.
 
This random YouTuber, while admitted to the NY bar, runs a debt collection agency and is a far-right Trump cheerleader...

This is the akin to a chiropractor performing brain surgery..

This isn't to mock debt collecting but to point out its about as far from the technical accounting and financial issues in this case as you can get..

YouTube’s incentive structure is not highly compatible with good legal commentary. Also, the incentive structure created by the MAGA base is not particularly compatible with good legal commentary, nor are the audiences at CNN, MSNBC, or FOX.

Politically extreme folks just tend to tune out things they don’t want to hear, nowadays. And there’s always somebody willing to tell them that the thing they don’t want to hear is wrong (and usually that they’re the victim).

It becomes somewhat self-selecting. There is good political commentary that can be entertaining but the jokes tend to be centrist because that’s where the bread is buttered.

Josh Blackman is probably the most “far right” law professor that I know of who has real credibility. He writes in Reason quite a bit. He also endorses or articulates a lot of aggressive legal arguments that favor Donald Trump or other MAGA figures, but those arguments tend to actually get taken seriously. For example, I think he endorsed and articulated the “not an officer of the United States” argument in response to the 14th Amendment Disqualification argument.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: VolTull
Man you are possessed. I could spend the time to dispute your remarks but this topic is like your last frontier in life. It means that much to you.
Maybe I am possessed, LOL. Your opinion maybe right, but I know one thing tired of them both, Biden & Trump. Both are unfit for the job and both will fail this country. Time to move on and leave the analyzing of individual's out of the equation. This seems to be a Defense mechanism for some of the posters on this board. Shifting the narrative to the poster vs dealing with the issues at hand. Trump and Biden are not good the solutions for this country. Yes, I do blame Trump more than I do blame Biden, but that doesn't make Biden any better than Trump. I served this country for 28 years and to think that one individual could set us back decades because of his mouth is really the questions that some of you should be asking. We need a problem solving leader and neither of these two are the answer. Send them both packing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol

VN Store



Back
Top