The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

We've never had a president indicted for multiple felonies and for trying to openly subvert the will of the electorate.

The irony is that the party of law and order became the party of attacking every agency and person who is tasked with holding our leaders accountable.

Every rational person knows he's being picked on but every rational person also knows he's ******* guilty. You Trumpers are so blinded by his victimhood that you never pay attention to the fact that his actual defenses are non existent, for a reason.
😂
 
That seems to be your answer for everything that someone disagrees with you regarding Trump and is why I will not list any names because it is useless. I am not going to waller in the mud with you about this...Go figure it out.
Nah. That's not it. You can't name any.

Just run away like all you leftists do when cornered
 
Spineless then. You want to ride the fence and criticize everyone. ThTs the weakest position to take. Thanks for proving my point

You trying to shoehorn folks into a tribe is low IQ. Just because YOU can't reconcile not wanting or having to support one of the horrible options doesn't make someone spineless.

Personally, I enjoy watching you try to shame people into believing that your dog sh*t somehow smells better than thier dog sh*t - and how desperate some people are for that acceptance.

You should consider just sticking with making up names, everytime you weigh into a debate, you simply embarrass yourself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernardKingGOAT
You trying to shoehorn folks into a tribe is low IQ. Just because YOU can't reconcile not wanting or having to support one of the horrible options doesn't make someone spineless.

Personally, I enjoy watching you try to shame people into believing that your dog sh*t somehow smells better than thier dog sh*t - and how desperate some people are for that acceptance.

You should consider just sticking with making up names, everytime you weigh into a debate, you simply embarrass yourself.
Just asking a guy that criticizes everyone to state someone or something he supports brings out the VN bully. Sorry Simptic your schtick doesn’t work here.

State who or what you support before seemingly criticizing everyone or everything.
 
Name calling just the type of character I thought you were. When you grew up we can talk. Are you even old enough to vote? You proved my point for me. I told you this was your MO. The Immature TDS and the name calling. It is just who you are? You should change your name to Eric, it better suits you.
Who do you support?

Don’t answer so yo can continue to criticize everyone.
 
Just asking a guy that criticizes everyone to state someone or something he supports brings out the VN bully. Sorry Simptic your schtick doesn’t work here.

State who or what you support before seemingly criticizing everyone or everything.

I support fiscal responsibity, moral and ethical decency from it's leaders, personal accountability, strong infrastructure and defense and a small government that stays out of the personal decisions of its citizens.

If a leader doesn't check those boxes, I'll criticize to my hearts content. And you'll like it.
 
I support fiscal responsibity, moral and ethical decency from it's leaders, personal accountability, strong infrastructure and defense and a small government that stays out of the personal decisions of its citizens.

If a leader doesn't check those boxes, I'll criticize to my hearts content. And you'll like it.
We agree on a lot. All of the above actually.

I’m just asking another poster to give a few examples of whoever he supports because he criticizes everyone.
 
Just asking a guy that criticizes everyone to state someone or something he supports brings out the VN bully. Sorry Simptic your schtick doesn’t work here.

I’m just asking another poster to give a few examples of whoever he supports because he criticizes everyone.

What is your fix? I guess you think Congress is functioning the way it should.
We send those to Congress to fix problems, not create them. It requires compromise by both parties. The extremes from both sides are not getting us there even when there is a reasonable halfway point.
Any Republican or Democrat willing to meet in the middle to Compromise to find the middle ground has got my support provided that they meet the standards and check the boxes. They are there to serve the taxpayers People of the US. Those that are willing to Compromise without extreme agendas. Congress requires Compromise.

We have Representatives that work on fear, hate and chao. Congress is dysfunctional because of the BS. Most of those leaving are tried of the BS.

Read my posts you quite obviously have not. Attacking someone is not my MO. Defending it is.

Ever been to Washington, DC? Ever sat in Congressional hearings, HB & SB debates by skilled politicians? My guess is no! You have to go back before 2005, to see what the process should be. Congress has become totally dysfunctional because both sides are tribal hate of Bush, Obama, and Trump. People hated Clinton and Newt but they worked it out.

You will probably read this sentence first, Be careful for what you wish for and spew forth because it sounds good today but you may live in the mess for years to come. IOW, I don't even think you have even identified the problem to fix. You will eventually figure it out or pay the price for not figuring it out.
 
Sad you can’t list anyone that you support but list off an algorithm of who needs to leave. That amount that needs to leave is way low. You support 70% of congress staying in office? List some folks that you support. It would help you not appear as a critic to all sides on here. Maybe firm up your position a bit.

The poster is a sanctimonious fraud. At the "very least" blinded by a hate against their own better judgment.
 
I support fiscal responsibity, moral and ethical decency from it's leaders, personal accountability, strong infrastructure and defense and a small government that stays out of the personal decisions of its citizens.

If a leader doesn't check those boxes, I'll criticize to my hearts content. And you'll like it.

Did you vote in 2020?

If so, who did you vote for?

Will you bob and weave on this question because you know where I'm headed with this?
 
What is your fix? I guess you think Congress is functioning the way it should.
We send those to Congress to fix problems, not create them. It requires compromise by both parties. The extremes from both sides are not getting us there even when there is a reasonable halfway point.
Any Republican or Democrat willing to meet in the middle to Compromise to find the middle ground has got my support provided that they meet the standards and check the boxes. They are there to serve the taxpayers People of the US. Those that are willing to Compromise without extreme agendas. Congress requires Compromise.

We have Representatives that work on fear, hate and chao. Congress is dysfunctional because of the BS. Most of those leaving are tried of the BS.

Read my posts you quite obviously have not. Attacking someone is not my MO. Defending it is.

Ever been to Washington, DC? Ever sat in Congressional hearings, HB & SB debates by skilled politicians? My guess is no! You have to go back before 2005, to see what the process should be. Congress has become totally dysfunctional because both sides are tribal hate of Bush, Obama, and Trump. People hated Clinton and Newt but they worked it out.

You will probably read this sentence first, Be careful for what you wish for and spew forth because it sounds good today but you may live in the mess for years to come. IOW, I don't even think you have even identified the problem to fix. You will eventually figure it out or pay the price for not figuring it out.


I think most can agree that congress is broken. You admit that, in your opinion, something happened around 2005. Something probably happened before but it manifested itself in 2005 to you because the symptoms must bubble to the surface first.

Could it be that democrats did not accept the results of the 2000 election? Could it be that John Kerry ran in 2004, and is a lying piece of commie filth?

Most of these elected officials need to be ushered out after about two terms, but they aren't going to vote for their own demise, so we have to get back to practical, common sense solutions.

The issues existed before Trump. He ran because he saw the very same things you saw. It had gotten so bad that any attempt to reign it in would be met with all power given to the unelected bureaucrats.

You want to start to fix this mess then you have to have someone willing to reduce government where a lot of this waste and abuse exists.

Who ever thought the issues of the day would be fighting over women sports, if a man can pretend to be a woman, securing the border, etc? Those were once given defaults.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sudden Impact
I think most can agree that congress is broken. You admit that, in your opinion, something happened around 2005. Something probably happened before but it manifested itself in 2005 to you because the symptoms must bubble to the surface first.

Could it be that democrats did not accept the results of the 2000 election? Could it be that John Kerry ran in 2004, and is a lying piece of commie filth?

Most of these elected officials need to be ushered out after about two terms, but they aren't going to vote for their own demise, so we have to get back to practical, common sense solutions.

The issues existed before Trump. He ran because he saw the very same things you saw. It had gotten so bad that any attempt to reign it in would be met with all power given to the unelected bureaucrats.

You want to start to fix this mess then you have to have someone willing to reduce government where a lot of this waste and abuse exists.

Who ever thought the issues of the day would be fighting over women sports, if a man can pretend to be a woman, securing the border, etc? Those were once given defaults.
I agree with totally. I think you are right regarding it stemmed from the 2000 election and bubbled up to the 2005.

Americans should not be satisfied with a majority of elected officials we are putting in place to run our country. It is now easier to get elected based on hate, racism, radicalism, criminal activity and stupidity than ever before in our history. Elect Candidates who can cheat, lie, deflect over those who are there with a purpose. It was a swamp, now it is a deep hole of hell.
 
I agree with totally. I think you are right regarding it stemmed from the 2000 election and bubbled up to the 2005.

Americans should not be satisfied with a majority of elected officials we are putting in place to run our country. It is now easier to get elected based on hate, racism, radicalism, criminal activity and stupidity than ever before in our history. Elect Candidates who can cheat, lie, deflect over those who are there with a purpose. It was a swamp, now it is a deep hole of hell.

I'm not attempting to get you to change your mind on Trump. I laughed him off during most of the 2016 primary. Admittedly I was a Ted Cruz guy. I felt this country needed some Republican direction at the time after voting for Obama twice and all he did was denigrate the country in his last year or so in office. People also forget even Jessie Jackson talking about cutting off his privates, or his famous I will have more leverage after the election whisper.

Back to Trump, having seen what they've tried to do to this guy from before he was elected I think a lot of people don't like that hence him still having tremendous support. Even Chuck Schumer said the intelligence agencies has a lot of ways to get him for Trump saying they were dishonest. People view him as one of the few who have the stones to stand up against a system most would've been broken by, by now. People want change from that broken system in Washington and are willing to ignore some faults.
 
What is your fix? I guess you think Congress is functioning the way it should.
We send those to Congress to fix problems, not create them. It requires compromise by both parties. The extremes from both sides are not getting us there even when there is a reasonable halfway point.
Any Republican or Democrat willing to meet in the middle to Compromise to find the middle ground has got my support provided that they meet the standards and check the boxes. They are there to serve the taxpayers People of the US. Those that are willing to Compromise without extreme agendas. Congress requires Compromise.

We have Representatives that work on fear, hate and chao. Congress is dysfunctional because of the BS. Most of those leaving are tried of the BS.

Read my posts you quite obviously have not. Attacking someone is not my MO. Defending it is.

Ever been to Washington, DC? Ever sat in Congressional hearings, HB & SB debates by skilled politicians? My guess is no! You have to go back before 2005, to see what the process should be. Congress has become totally dysfunctional because both sides are tribal hate of Bush, Obama, and Trump. People hated Clinton and Newt but they worked it out.

You will probably read this sentence first, Be careful for what you wish for and spew forth because it sounds good today but you may live in the mess for years to come. IOW, I don't even think you have even identified the problem to fix. You will eventually figure it out or pay the price for not figuring it out.
A lot of words to summarize that you are a fence sitter. Watch out for splinters. I know what I believe and I know what my foundation is. You have way too much faith in the enemy in DC. But you can’t name anyone that you support.

Oh and I didn’t say you attacked them. I said you like to criticize them all. It is a strange take. You want to keep 70% of them, can’t list any of the 70% you support, but criticize all sides.
 
A lot of words to summarize that you are a fence sitter. Watch out for splinters. I know what I believe and I know what my foundation is. You have way too much faith in the enemy in DC. But you can’t name anyone that you support.

Oh and I didn’t say you attacked them. I said you like to criticize them all. It is a strange take. You want to keep 70% of them, can’t list any of the 70% you support, but criticize all sides.
That is the problem with words, you think it is a simple solution with simple words and when someone does not agree with you, then you criticize them as if you know it all.

To educate you I am a Centrist and am a Moderate not a Fence Sitter. I value my vote. For the most of my life, I have always wanted closed borders and a reasonable time for Abortion. 12-15 weeks.

Both these issues are now political and good talking points. They are an exercise of control and power. For many years they have been the subject of debates and used to weaponize a candidate's group for votes, a tool. Indictments entered the fray. Hey it riles up the base, but it is politics not policy. Seperate the two categories, ignore the noise and you will find out nothing will change until you vote the right people into office. Never will happen because it has turned into a game.

Regarding the future with abortion and immigrants, Lack of abortions at a reasonable time, will increase population and drain taxpayers' dollars spent on unwanted children. Not closing the border to immigrants in this nation, will like, abortion drain Taxpayers dollars to support these groups with housing, education, hospital bills, social security and raise the population number of that of China. This is your desired future not mine, so elect responsible individuals in Congress that can Compromise on Bills to protect the Citizens of the US without all the mob mentality in the process.


Fix Congress by electing responsible moderate, Centrist type candidates and the rest will follow. Name calling is not working. If DJT fixed everything then why are we still having problems at the border? He can't even explain his stance on Abortion and has flipped flopped on it more than Mitt. Election Interference? Sure it is because it is the American Way. He is just as guilty of Election Interference as those Democrats an innocent man would have had all these charges tried and over with by now.
 
A lot of words to summarize that you are a fence sitter. Watch out for splinters. I know what I believe and I know what my foundation is. You have way too much faith in the enemy in DC. But you can’t name anyone that you support.

Oh and I didn’t say you attacked them. I said you like to criticize them all. It is a strange take. You want to keep 70% of them, can’t list any of the 70% you support, but criticize all sides.
Paralysis of analysis about someone you don't know. Read above, pretty much summarizes the problem is Congress and a lack of leadership. I summarized in a lot of words so you may understand. You want simple answers with simple solutions, the problem is that I look at it from what I can control and what I cannot control in my world. Simple solutions for complex problems do not work.
 
That is the problem with words, you think it is a simple solution with simple words and when someone does not agree with you, then you criticize them as if you know it all.

To educate you I am a Centrist and am a Moderate not a Fence Sitter. I value my vote. For the most of my life, I have always wanted closed borders and a reasonable time for Abortion. 12-15 weeks.

Both these issues are now political and good talking points. They are an exercise of control and power. For many years they have been the subject of debates and used to weaponize a candidate's group for votes, a tool. Indictments entered the fray. Hey it riles up the base, but it is politics not policy. Seperate the two categories, ignore the noise and you will find out nothing will change until you vote the right people into office. Never will happen because it has turned into a game.

Regarding the future with abortion and immigrants, Lack of abortions at a reasonable time, will increase population and drain taxpayers' dollars spent on unwanted children. Not closing the border to immigrants in this nation, will like, abortion drain Taxpayers dollars to support these groups with housing, education, hospital bills, social security and raise the population number of that of China. This is your desired future not mine, so elect responsible individuals in Congress that can Compromise on Bills to protect the Citizens of the US without all the mob mentality in the process.


Fix Congress by electing responsible moderate, Centrist type candidates and the rest will follow. Name calling is not working. If DJT fixed everything then why are we still having problems at the border? He can't even explain his stance on Abortion and has flipped flopped on it more than Mitt. Election Interference? Sure it is because it is the American Way. He is just as guilty of Election Interference as those Democrats an innocent man would have had all these charges tried and over with by now.
I’ve said it before and now I know I’m accurate. You ooze Uniparty. I knew I had you pegged when you could not or would not name one single person in politics that you support. A moderate is about as useful as a football bat.
 
I’ve said it before and now I know I’m accurate. You ooze Uniparty. I knew I had you pegged when you could not or would not name one single person in politics that you support. A moderate is about as useful as a football bat.
I can name plenty that is your problem, not mine. I value my vote and don't overlook the fact that there are good reasonable people in both parties. You are just labeling without any justification, I told you why I would not give you my answer because you are unreasonable and just want to rip apart the answer without justification to win. Keep beating your head against the wall and then you tell me the wall is bleeding not realizing it is your own head. Do me a favor do not respond to any of my posts as you are a waste of time.
 
Last edited:
i can name plenty that is your problem not mine. I value my vote and don't overlook the fact that there are good people in both parties.
95% of them are crooks and liars. I still can’t believe you would keep 70% of them. That may be the most shocking thing you have said. Especially with their unpopular polling.

Still can’t name anyone you support?
 
95% of them are crooks and liars. I still can’t believe you would keep 70% of them. That may be the most shocking thing you have said. Especially with their unpopular polling.

Still can’t name anyone you support?
I am not going to do so. 30% is a good enough start. Would slow the process down. No reason for overkill. Plus you still need dissenting arguments to identify issues and problems in bills. It's how the process works in Congress. Most of the Good ones have left or headed out the door. Some are dinosaurs which is another flaw in the system. So add age restrictions to the wants.
 

VN Store



Back
Top