The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

#17,877
#17,877
85SugarVol said:
Meh… DEI should be defeated in the court of public opinion - as a faulty premise.

Not via putting legislative pen to paper.
Click to expand...
When schools are spending taxpayer money to promote that tripe, it is indeed the role of the legislature (who controls spending) to put an end to it. But I understand your sentiment
 
  • Like
Reactions: IBlvNTmWrk, davethevol and CobbVol
#17,878
#17,878
OrangeTsar said:
When schools are spending taxpayer money to promote that tripe, it is indeed the role of the legislature (who controls spending) to put an end to it. But I understand your sentiment
Click to expand...
Eh, publicly funded schools are sticky.

I was more talking about the corporate world.

I have no problem with writing it out of State institutions - like the Military. It has absolutely no place there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider and OrangeTsar
#17,881
#17,881
OrangeTsar said:
Man, January 2025 through January 2029 is going to be really traumatic for some of you folks. My advice is to select a therapist now as the waiting list for new patients can sometimes take a few months.
Click to expand...
We can send them to mental health "camps"
 
#17,883
#17,883
Trump's attorney is arguing that Cohen, not Trump, made the decision to pay off Daniels.

That seems extremely weak to me. Cohen had to take out a home equity line to provide the $ to National Enquirer and had to get paid back by Trump. It is truly hard to imagine that Cohen would do that on the fly, without an assurance form Trump that he'd be paid back.
 
#17,884
#17,884
CobbVol said:
Heroic Judge Cannon rejects this most recent government attack on free speech ...

Click to expand...



That's not what that says. What she is saying is that she is denying the motion without prejudice, i.e. they can ref-file it. Her denial is based on failure to meet with opposing counsel and confer, first, which is a requirement in federal court down here. This is what I do every week. The judge is saying that the prosecution did not adequately confer with Trump's lawyers before filing the motion. Once they do that, they can re-file the motion.
 
#17,885
#17,885
lawgator1 said:
That's not what that says. What she is saying is that she is denying the motion without prejudice, i.e. they can ref-file it. Her denial is based on failure to meet with opposing counsel and confer, first, which is a requirement in federal court down here. This is what I do every week. The judge is saying that the prosecution did not adequately confer with Trump's lawyers before filing the motion. Once they do that, they can re-file the motion.
Click to expand...
Hence the phrase "most recent". Trying to file on a Friday before Memorial Day weekend usually don't go well unless you are in DC or NY. The Friday order did ask to gag Trump and his speech in his defense.
 
#17,886
#17,886
lawgator1 said:
That's not what that says. What she is saying is that she is denying the motion without prejudice, i.e. they can ref-file it. Her denial is based on failure to meet with opposing counsel and confer, first, which is a requirement in federal court down here. This is what I do every week. The judge is saying that the prosecution did not adequately confer with Trump's lawyers before filing the motion. Once they do that, they can re-file the motion.
Click to expand...

So basically this was a PR stunt by the prosecution to make the judge look partisan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider, MemphisVol77, davethevol and 3 others
#17,887
#17,887
lawgator1 said:
That's not what that says. What she is saying is that she is denying the motion without prejudice, i.e. they can ref-file it. Her denial is based on failure to meet with opposing counsel and confer, first, which is a requirement in federal court down here. This is what I do every week. The judge is saying that the prosecution did not adequately confer with Trump's lawyers before filing the motion. Once they do that, they can re-file the motion.
Click to expand...
What was the motion for?
 
#17,888
#17,888
Cod said:
Robert DeNiro outside the courtroom is perfect example of TDS, Trump is definitely skull ****ing him every night in his sleep.

I don't know what is worse, right wing conspirators or left wing conspirators, he's definitely a far left conspirator.
Click to expand...
Arrogant enough to think his opinion means something to people. Should people be glad he took time off berating his staff to help the peasants?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT and SpaceCoastVol
#17,891
#17,891
lawgator1 said:
That's not what that says. What she is saying is that she is denying the motion without prejudice, i.e. they can ref-file it. Her denial is based on failure to meet with opposing counsel and confer, first, which is a requirement in federal court down here. This is what I do every week. The judge is saying that the prosecution did not adequately confer with Trump's lawyers before filing the motion. Once they do that, they can re-file the motion.
Click to expand...
Sounds like to me, Mr. Smith either didn’t know the procedures in which case he is incompetent or he knew the procedures and chose to ignore them in which case he is just an ass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85 and Orangeburst
#17,892
#17,892
LibertyVol said:
Sounds like to me, Mr. Smith either didn’t know the procedures in which case he is incompetent or he knew the procedures and chose to ignore them in which case he is just an ass.
Click to expand...
Cat and Mouse Game really simple. He was baiting Cannon by forcing a ruling and there is more to come. Of course, people will chime in from both sides, but it is part of the game.
 
#17,893
#17,893
Cannon is over her head: there is no dispute among experts about that. She wasn't qualified to be a federal judge in the first place....and certainly
not to handle a trial like this, as she as shown over the last year, when she either been purposely stalling or paralyzed by indecision and incompetence.
 
#17,894
#17,894
turbovol said:
Cannon is over her head: there is no dispute among experts about that. She wasn't qualified to be a federal judge in the first place....and certainly
not to handle a trial like this, as she as shown over the last year, when she either been purposely stalling or paralyzed by indecision and incompetence.
Click to expand...
The American Bar Association, which is not exactly a conservative organization, said she was qualified.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LibertyVol, volbound1700, hog88 and 1 other person
#17,896
#17,896
Sudden Impact said:
Cat and Mouse Game really simple. He was baiting Cannon by forcing a ruling and there is more to come. Of course, people will chime in from both sides, but it is part of the game.
Click to expand...
Did you read LG explanation as to why she made thel ruling she did..and he is more partisan and anti trump then you. Had nothing to do with partisanship like y'all are trying to do..but with procedure
 
#17,898
#17,898
lawgator1 said:
Trump's attorney is arguing that Cohen, not Trump, made the decision to pay off Daniels.

That seems extremely weak to me. Cohen had to take out a home equity line to provide the $ to National Enquirer and had to get paid back by Trump. It is truly hard to imagine that Cohen would do that on the fly, without an assurance form Trump that he'd be paid back.
Click to expand...
How big of a stretch would it be for him to think he that if he could show Trump that he had is back that he would put him in one of the cush positions in Washington?
 
#17,899
#17,899
whodeycin85 said:
Did you read LG explanation as to why she made thel ruling she did..and he is more partisan and anti trump then you. Had nothing to do with partisanship like y'all are trying to do..but with procedure
Click to expand...
I don't pay to much attention to LG explanations. This is a political game of checkers and chess. Smith filing is just trying to trip up Cannon to get her removed, nothing more, nothing less, and nothing else. The document case is dead in the water and might as well move the process a long. Dropping depth charges to see what floats to the top so no explanation is needed.
 
#17,900
#17,900
Sudden Impact said:
I don't pay to much attention to LG explanations. This is a political game of checkers and chess. Smith filing is just trying to trip up Cannon to get her removed, nothing more, nothing less, and nothing else. The document case is dead in the water and might as well move the process a long. Dropping depth charges to see what floats to the top so no explanation is needed.
Click to expand...
So your agreeing his filing has no merit and is just for show..good for you
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top