whodeycin85
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2009
- Messages
- 9,098
- Likes
- 9,892
You are part of the problem. You only see the other side.I am thinking in particular of Trump's many screeches over the years about mail in ballots, about how the GOP has condemned them as rife with fraud. Trump; himself expressly called for an end to using them a scant four months ago.....
But today, he urges people to vote for him, including by mail in ballot.
Absolutely shameless and utterly without principle of any kind.
So in your mind more partisanship and tribal voting is needed. In my mind you are the problem.
Each side should have some core values that they are willing to fight for... however, both parties act like everything is a core value and the right side to be on is the opposite of whatever the other side is arguing for. Even more problematic is that our current group of leaders often seem to reverse their positions and each party then switches without missing a beat.
It is like watching an old looney toon cartoon when Bugs was fooling Daffy. It is pitiful. We need an adult in the white house to bring everyone to the table. Problem is we have the world's oldest child and a depends wearing dementia patient as our choices. And it's our fault for falling for this garbage.
It would be remiss to think to continue down the path more loosely regulated voting procedures and not ensuring one person, one vote with validated ID is a somehow good for a republic. The goal should be zero nefarious activity from either side. That’s doesn’t mean it’s preventing people from voting.I am thinking in particular of Trump's many screeches over the years about mail in ballots, about how the GOP has condemned them as rife with fraud. Trump; himself expressly called for an end to using them a scant four months ago.....
But today, he urges people to vote for him, including by mail in ballot.
Absolutely shameless and utterly without principle of any kind.
How do you feel about the lies regarding Hunter’s laptop that are on clear public display? Even Biden himself said in a debate in was Russian disinformation. He didn’t say it’s unverified, he claimed it was Russian disinformation. He was far from alone. Are you a believer in that example? Deflection coming in 3…2…1…
How do you feel about the lies regarding Hunter’s laptop that are on clear public display? Even Biden himself said in a debate in was Russian disinformation. He didn’t say it’s unverified, he claimed it was Russian disinformation. He was far from alone. Are you a believer in that example? Deflection coming in 3…2…1…
I completely disagree, but you know that.Yeah, sounds good in theory but the reason we have, in your words, "the world's oldest child and a depends wearing dementia patient" is largely because there arent actually 2 Parties but one UniParty. Our Country is in the edge of destruction thanks to the UniParty, not partisanship.
When you have a situation, like we do today, where one Party (UniParty) is taking our Country to hell...then you bet your ass we need some partisanship. We need vitriolic ugly partisanship. Instead we get Dan Crenshaw, John Cornyn, Lindsey Graham types. Disgraceful.
Here you go in case you missed it
"BUT THAT'S DIFFERENT"
They knew the laptop (the laptop, not the links to “deals”) was real. They ran the story it was fake anyway.You guys are (purposefully, it would seem, or out of sheer ignorance) failing to draw the distinction between the accusation that Joe Biden was making deals with foreign entities versus the laptop itself being fabricated.
In the clip above, Biden is saying that the accusation that he did so is not true.
What you are talking about are Hunter's emails wherein Hunter tries to make himself some deals. No one is defending that.
But what you are doing is blurring the line, overlooking the distinct issues, and trying (falsely) to make it seem like Biden is claiming the laptop was fabricated when that is not what he is saying in those clips.
Wow. You're some kind of specialYou guys are (purposefully, it would seem, or out of sheer ignorance) failing to draw the distinction between the accusation that Joe Biden was making deals with foreign entities versus the laptop itself being fabricated.
In the clip above, Biden is saying that the accusation that he did so is not true.
What you are talking about are Hunter's emails wherein Hunter tries to make himself some deals. No one is defending that.
But what you are doing is blurring the line, overlooking the distinct issues, and trying (falsely) to make it seem like Biden is claiming the laptop was fabricated when that is not what he is saying in those clips.
You guys are (purposefully, it would seem, or out of sheer ignorance) failing to draw the distinction between the accusation that Joe Biden was making deals with foreign entities versus the laptop itself being fabricated.
In the clip above, Biden is saying that the accusation that he did so is not true.
What you are talking about are Hunter's emails wherein Hunter tries to make himself some deals. No one is defending that.
But what you are doing is blurring the line, overlooking the distinct issues, and trying (falsely) to make it seem like Biden is claiming the laptop was fabricated when that is not what he is saying in those clips.
No offense, but ...You guys are (purposefully, it would seem, or out of sheer ignorance) failing to draw the distinction between the accusation that Joe Biden was making deals with foreign entities versus the laptop itself being fabricated.
In the clip above, Biden is saying that the accusation that he did so is not true.
What you are talking about are Hunter's emails wherein Hunter tries to make himself some deals. No one is defending that.
But what you are doing is blurring the line, overlooking the distinct issues, and trying (falsely) to make it seem like Biden is claiming the laptop was fabricated when that is not what he is saying in those clips.