Rickyvol77
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2019
- Messages
- 16,786
- Likes
- 21,566
No other way out?He did take swings. I saw it on the video.
But if I feel threatened and don't think I have any other way out, somebody is catching these hands.
Big difference between assault and defending myself.
White shirt ran toward two dudes parked in the middle of the street. He wasnt boxed in!
Your post is as bad a Ricky's.
This is the defense that will be used and it will be interesting because obviously there was a struggle and you can see on the video that Arbery is punching the guy in the head. Of course what will be at question is who attacked whom? Did the guy with the gun only react after Arbery grabbed the gun or did he instigate the physical assualt?No obvious crime was committed until the guy assaulted them
I was wondering that too. Kind of annoyed that just as Arbery was getting to the truck he moves the camera away for some reason, then he picks it back up.He look to have run around the truck, which was attempting to block his path on a public street. That's when the struggle occurred.
Anybody know what the involvement of the videographer was? Was this just a chance occurrence, or was the truck supposed to block the front escape and the guy taking the video the rear escape?
He was obviously being threatened. I'm pretty sure it's not legal to threaten someone with a gun, and since they were civilians, neither of the two men had the lawful authority to detain the guy. You're making a bull **** argument. Those two men violated the law and someone ended up dead. They should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. This is not self defense because their actions created the imminent danger.For assaulting a dude
I've made one of those 3 points already.No other way out?
The choices were:
- stop and wait for the police to arrive sine they were on the way
- keep running away in the direction away from them as they couldn’t catch him
- run straight towards the guy and punch him and try to steal his shotgun
I'm not replying to you any more in this thread. Your agenda which waits in ambush is not worth the time it takes to type a reply.He look to have run around the truck, which was attempting to block his path on a public street. That's when the struggle occurred.
Anybody know what the involvement of the videographer was? Was this just a chance occurrence, or was the truck supposed to block the front escape and the guy taking the video the rear escape?
Dude, the two men had no authority to arm themselves and chase this guy down. Zilch. Nada. None. Their actions led to the situation. It was unlawful. Not sure why you're defending them?No other way out?
The choices were:
- stop and wait for the police to arrive sine they were on the way
- keep running away in the direction away from them as they couldn’t catch him
- run straight towards the guy and punch him and try to steal his shotgun
No other way out?
The choices were:
- stop and wait for the police to arrive sine they were on the way
- keep running away in the direction away from them as they couldn’t catch him
- run straight towards the guy and punch him and try to steal his shotgun
No other way out?
The choices were:
- stop and wait for the police to arrive sine they were on the way
- keep running away in the direction away from them as they couldn’t catch him
- run straight towards the guy and punch him and try to steal his shotgun
Possession of a firearm doesn’t equal “threatening” someone. If they never verbally threatened him or pointed it at him, they simply told him to stop and that they had called the police. Now he could’ve kept running away and ignored them or stopped to talk to police but he chose to fight them and atttempt to steal the guys gunHe was obviously being threatened. I'm pretty sure it's not legal to threaten someone with a gun, and since they were civilians, neither of the two men had the lawful authority to detain the guy. You're making a bull **** argument. Those two men violated the law and someone ended up dead. They should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. This is not self defense because their actions created the imminent danger.
Agree it should be manslaughter charges, but not sure it should be involuntary. The two men took questionable actions that led to this man's death. They created the situation through unlawful action.This is the defense that will be used and it will be interesting because obviously there was a struggle and you can see on the video that Arbery is punching the guy in the head. Of course what will be at question is who attacked whom? Did the guy with the gun only react after Arbery grabbed the gun or did he instigate the physical assualt?
Hopefully the prosecutor won't overcharge and go for murder like the idiots did in the Zimmerman case. Charge him with involuntary manslaughter. Much easier to convict. Zimmerman would be in jail if the prosecution had not been cowards and caved to SJW pressure.
1) maybe. Maybe not but they stated they had called the police and that’s when the guy had originally took off runningLMAO at your first point. There's no way he knew that the police were coming.
Second, I don't think the kid new WTF was going on. The truck probably passed him while he was jogging and stopped on the road ahead so that they could gear up to attack him. He seems to run around the truck and then the guy fires a shot at him. The only thing that kid could do is fight back.
To your 3rd point, if you were unarmed and a guy in close proximity starts firing at you, you would probably defend yourself any way possible. What you said certainly isn't what I saw on that video.