GreyWolf1129
Get off my planet.
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2005
- Messages
- 8,459
- Likes
- 11,172
His logic wasn't really that flawed. What the NCAA did was very similar to the vigilante justice he described. Just because someone commits a heinous crime doesn't automatically compel some random person or organization to go out and carry out whatever punishment they see fit. That's the responsibility of the courts.
Fair enough if you disagree...If you really believe that, then you have no idea how the criminal justice system works.
Ask any cop or prosecuting attorney about our "excellent system", and see what they say.
Go Vols.
Fair enough if you disagree...
As for the comment I made, I said relative to others. There are many aspects that suck, but what we have a damn sight better than most of the rest of the planet.
If you really believe that, then you have no idea how the criminal justice system works.
Ask any cop or prosecuting attorney about our "excellent system", and see what they say.
Go Vols.
And as for you, Chuckles...I won't ever be accused of child molestation, or anything equally heinous, for one very simple reason. I don't do it.
Your post, and your logic, are so flawed that I cannot find any link between my post and yours, other than the possibility that something I said hit close to home with you.
You do that. Look me up. Bring your justice. Swift and decisive action will surely follow.
Do me a favor, put me on your ignore list. I'm not saying this to be mean, I just don't care to ever exchange posts with you again.
Go Vols.
100%, completely disagree with everything you said. I can't believe 12 people liked that garbage.
The President and head coach kept a felony hidden from the public and the police. It has nothing to do with paying players. It has to do with a child-sex abuse cover up. And Sandusky was still granted access to the school years later.
I have absolutely 0 bad feelings for Protect Sandusky University and I do not disagree with how the NCAA came down on them. Good riddance.
All of the arguments, for and against the NCAA's actions, have been made. I happen to fall on the side of "it was the right thing to do". You obviously disagree. Neither one of us is likely to change our mind in the years to come.
For me, in very simplified logic, any institution that allows three of it's most senior officers to conceal a serial pedophile for at least 14 years is the most blatant example of "Lack of Institutional Control" I can think of.
We disagree on this one.
Go Vols.
As I stated earlier, this is always the case with NCAA sanctions that have to do with student athletes. I remember everyone on this board gloating over the USC sanctions even though the current coaches and players had nothing to do with the Reggie Bush mess. Fair or not, that's the way the NCAA works.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Exactly.
The NCAA, under the pretense of "de-emphasizing" football, brought the majority of the focus away from the victims back to football.
A former DC, who still had access to the football facilties used that poisition as a ruse to lure young boys and rape them. The head coach, along with several others knew, and looked the other way.
While it may be outside the normal role of the NCAA, I have no problem with it. It's no different than Roger Godell's decision to start punising personal conduct imo.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
And I don't see the presidents allowing that to happen. If there was ever a non recruiting situation that needed to be dealt with by the NCAA this is it. If at some point 5-10 years from now the AA starts to punish teams for random non recruiting violations then I'll be concerned, but they needed to come down hard on this one. JMO.
I'm in agreement here.
The NCAA was in a no-win situation. If they did nothing, you'd have people complaining about how the NCAA cares more about boosters giving out $100 handshakes and coaches buying pizza for players.
1. As has been mentioned, I believe this may be the first time the NCAA has ever handed out sanctions without conducting an investigation. Whether or not you think it was right in penalizing Penn State, it is absolute fact that they threw out their own rule book with this decision. That in and of itself should be worrisome.
2. In the NCAA's own words, a specific violation that's on the books must have occurred for LOIC to have happened.
3. The legal system is already dealing with everybody who was in a position to turn Sandusky over to the authorities. If you think institutional punishment should have occurred, the Clery Act would have handled that.
4. For the sake of argument, say I agreed the NCAA should have taken action without conducting an investigation, why not the death penalty? What they did will already be damaging to central PA, why should covering up child rape receive less punishment that giving amateur football players envelopes stuffed with cash?
To summarize, the NCAA destroyed its own rule book, took on massive new authority over public institutions to which it is accountable to nobody, let Baylor slide for covering up MURDER among other previous incidents at other schools, and all to cover their own ass purely from a PR standpoint when the legal system was already in a place to cover all those bases.
Let me be perfectly clear, for meand many of us, it was the way in which they went about what they did as much as the fact that they did it in the first place. I don't think there are many people who fully grasp the potential threat to college athletics as a whole from the NCAA's actions.
I couldn't see past the veiled threat.
I have a conditioned response to threats. It's a character flaw.
Go Vols.
There was no veiled threat. Get your feelings off your sleeve and open your eyes. An analogy that harsh many times has to be used to open the eyes of those that "have their minds made up". I have nothing against you and agree with you 99% of the time over on the FB threads. That is why I felt comfortable making that analogy. I will take that into account in my future responses.:hi:
The same as the number of current USC players that were involved in the Reggie Bush mess. As I've said, that's te nature of AA sanctions.Yeah, there is that little thing called a contract and the players union and all that. But let's not let that stand in the way of the vigilantes. And oh yeah, exactly which one of the players was actually involved in this? Could you remind me of that?
Yes, but membership in the NCAA is voluntary. If they get out of hand there is nothing they could do if the BCS conferences told them to go straight to hell.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Oh I agree it would be bad for college football. I was just ponting out that the option is there if the NCAA gets to heavy handed.I've been expecting something like this since before the Penn State scandal broke. But I also expect it will include a move away from amateurism, which you may or may not be for but it surely won't be college football anymore.
And here we go:
Penn State Nittany Lions -- Trustees appeal to NCAA, vow federal lawsuit - ESPN
The lawyering game is afoot.