- Joined
- Oct 24, 2003
- Messages
- 115,329
- Likes
- 67,834
I think part of it was how great the Horsemen were. They had to come up with these ridiculous gimmicks and angles to elevate their other workers to the level of Flair, Anderson, Blanchard, and Windham/Luger/Sid.(GAVol @ Aug 4 said:Poor WCW just never could quite overcome their own cheese factor.
(OrangeSquare @ Aug 4 said:About the Jones' Situation:
Beginning Tuesday, all teams were permitted to place as many as seven players per day on the waiver wire. Thus by Friday, many teams will have already put members of their 25-man roster on waivers.
Multiple teams can claim a player who has been placed on waivers. If two teams were to claim a specific player, the lower-ranking team according to winning percentage (whether it be an American or National League team), is given rights to that player for 48 hours.
If the Astros and Red Sox were to both put a claim on Andruw Jones, the Astros would have that 48-hour period to discuss a trade with the Braves. If nothing materialized, Jones would remain with the Braves.
All players remain on the waiver wire for two full business days. If they are never claimed, they can be traded at any point, to any team for the remainder of the season. But to be eligible for the postseason, a player must be traded by Aug. 31.
If a player is claimed by a team and a deal never materializes, a team will not likely place them back on waivers. When they initially place a player on waivers, a team has the right to pull them back at any time.
But when a player is placed on waivers a second time, the claim is irrevocable. Thus any claiming team owns the rights and a trade must be completed.
(hatvol96 @ Aug 4 said:Don't rip on Torborg. His son is arguably the worst professional wrestler of all time.
Irrevocable waivers are exactly that. If someone claims them, they get them. The Red Sox tried to get out from under Manny Ramirez's contract a couple of years ago by putting him on irrevocable waivers. Nobody took the bait.(ukvols @ Aug 5 said:I might be wrong, but I think I heard tonight that when a player is claimed after being initially placed on waivers, if he is not traded within 48 hours, the waiving must pull him back or lose him to the claiming team outright. That leads me to believe that if a player were placed on irrevocable waivers, he would become the "property" of the claiming team, with or without a trade. Without a trade, perhaps the claiming team loses a draft pick to the waiving team. Does any of this sound right? Or is the player not playing for anybody that year until a deal is worked out. I was just thrown off by the statement that "at trade must be completed." What if they can't reach an agreement?
Finally some stability in the bullpen and then . . .
Baez has appendectomy; goes on DL | ajc.com
Sometimes it's just not your year.
Did he trip over the base?
I see the Braves are 4 back now. It really makes you think 'what if'.This Wild Card race is nuts. I thought it was over last week when they dropped to 7 games out, but if the Reds score holds up and they lose, tomorrow morning there are going to be 10 teams within 5 games and 8 teams within 3 1/2 games of the lead.
:wacko: