The Official Michael Cohen Testimony Thread

Will y’all please stop raining on their parade???

Damnit man. They had all their hopes and prayers on this.

They call Trump a liar daily. Yet, they take the word of a liar.

The hypocrisy must be killing them. Ease up fellows.
 
anything about supporting documentation?

also - did he explain the specific code he received that said "I want you to lie to Congress"?

again I didn't see it - just wondering

You expect him to have a published dictionary of Trump code?
 
What am I missing? We’ve not found a crime. So we want to continue calling witnesses until we do?

Honestly, what’s the case for continuing this?


Yes, there is need to question more people.

The president orchestrated hush payments in violation of campaign finance laws. Witnessed by CFO Weisselberg. Come on down Mr Weisselberg.

Defrauding his own charity for personal gain. Should easily be shown to have been paid for by the charity. Come on down soon to be named straw man. And SDNY and or State of NY already has the charity's financial records.

He deflated his personal wealth in order to evade taxes. I'm sure SDNY has or will soon have his financials on that front. So will the State of NY. People will have to be questioned about that.

Trump's lawyers including Sekulow changed changed Cohen's prepared testimony. Come on down Jay and other Trump lawyers and see if they tell the same story. If Trump's lawyers did that then Trump knew.

I didn't get to see it all but the above are a few things that need to be looked at.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
Why so many and such profoundly false statements specifically about dealings with Russia?

1. He was continually asked about Russia. If he'd have been asked about other international endeavors I bet there'd be plenty of lies

2. He lied about a lot; not sure Russia is the top category.

Since you found Cohen credible why don't you accept that he (the inner circle) never saw any collusion evidence from Trump or campaign? (opening statement).
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and Obsessed
1. He was continually asked about Russia. If he'd have been asked about other international endeavors I bet there'd be plenty of lies

2. He lied about a lot; not sure Russia is the top category.

Since you found Cohen credible why don't you accept that he (the inner circle) never saw any collusion evidence from Trump or campaign? (opening statement).


You assume he would have been privy to it, but it was coming from other places and people. Not his area of expertise.
 
1. He was continually asked about Russia. If he'd have been asked about other international endeavors I bet there'd be plenty of lies

2. He lied about a lot; not sure Russia is the top category.

Since you found Cohen credible why don't you accept that he (the inner circle) never saw any collusion evidence from Trump or campaign? (opening statement).

The inner circle has also lied about it (Jr.) and you don't get much closer than family.
 
Yes, there is need to question more people.

The president orchestrated hush payments in violation of campaign finance laws. Witnessed by CFO Weisselberg. Come on down Mr Weisselberg.

Defrauding his own charity for personal gain. Should easily be shown to have been paid for by the charity. Come on down soon to be named straw man. And SDNY already has the charity's financial records.

He deflated his personal wealth in order to evade taxes. I'm sure SDNY has or will soon have his financials on that front. So will the State of NY.

Trump's lawyers including Sekulow changed changed Cohen's prepared testimony. Come on down Jay and other Trump lawyers and see if they tell the same story.

I didn't get to see it all but the above are a few things that need to be looked at.

Is Congress the finder of crimes?

Is Congress the forum to indict or charge for crimes?

Interesting that the key witness in all these potential crimes is about to go to prison and hence not available to be a witness in any trial of said potential crimes.

I have no doubt that Dems will run hearings about every one of these things for the next 2 years but none of these are punishable by Congress nor will lead to impeachment and conviction (removal from office). They will be entirely motivated by political objectives and that should be of concern to every citizen but it's all about winning so principles be damned.
 
The inner circle has also lied about it (Jr.) and you don't get much closer than family.

So Cohen who was part of the inner circle was completed excluded from all the collusion actions? That's what we have to believe?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
So Cohen who was part of the inner circle was completed excluded from all the collusion actions? That's what we have to believe?
Yes, he was not one of the colluders. Actually had little to do with the campaign other than his specialty of pornstar payoffs and campaign finance violations. It's not like he was connected with russians like Manafort, and Gates or had any clue what Roger Stone was doing.
 
Is Congress the finder of crimes?

Is Congress the forum to indict or charge for crimes?

Interesting that the key witness in all these potential crimes is about to go to prison and hence not available to be a witness in any trial of said potential crimes.

I have no doubt that Dems will run hearings about every one of these things for the next 2 years but none of these are punishable by Congress nor will lead to impeachment and conviction (removal from office). They will be entirely motivated by political objectives and that should be of concern to every citizen but it's all about winning so principles be damned.

They have an obligation to verify Cohen's testimony.
 
As long as they keep discovering wrongdoings and the noose keeps tightening, they should keep digging.

What wrong doing was discovered? How did the noose tighten?

And it seems none of this is about collusion. That’s why so many of us call this a witch hunt. It seems to be “investigate trump from all angles and hope something sticks”
 

VN Store



Back
Top