The Problems with Trans-ideology

#3,577
#3,577
DinkinFlicka said:
Pretty much all protestors of any flavor have either too much free time or unchecked mental issues these days.
Click to expand...
Probably true. Organized 'protests' are the height of stupidity imho, because they always run out of steam. That is what is so interesting about the Bud Light thing. It isn't 'organized', but it has legs. That being said, I still predict there will be lots of BL at tailgates in a couple of months....

I don't buy Nike products for various reasons. I have no illusion that it will affect their bottom line nor do they care in the least. But I still have a choice where to spend my money, and I sleep well knowing that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77, marcusluvsvols, whodeycin85 and 3 others
#3,578
#3,578
whodeycin85 said:
"Drag queens, otherwise known as “female impersonators," are most typically gay men" Jennifer O’Brien Ph.D. All Thing LGBT -------------------- The proportions of heterosexual and homosexual pedophiles among sex offenders against children: an exploratory study: K Freund 1, R J WatsonAffiliations expandPMID: 1556756 DOI: 10.1080/00926239208404356 https: //pubmed.nbci.nlm.nih.gov/1556756 An official website of the United States government The present study investigated whether the etiology of preferred partner sex among pedophiles is related to the etiology of preferred partner sex among males preferring adult partners...The ratio of heterosexual to homosexual pedophiles was calculated to be approximately 11:1. This suggests that the resulting proportion of true pedophiles among persons with a homosexual erotic development is greater than that in persons who develop heterosexually. ---------------- The Journal of Sex Research found that homosexual pedophiles commit about one-third of the total number of sex offenses against children. This fact is particularly disturbing. Homosexuals comprise just two percent of the population, yet are responsible for 33% of all child sexual abuse. They offend against children at 16 times the rate of the normal population. The Archives of Sexual Behavior, in a study of 229 convicted child molesters, found that “eighty-six percent of offenders against males described themselves as homosexual or bisexual." -------- July 12, 2015 105 year old organization, Boy Scouts of America moves to stop banning gay troop leaders. Sept 8, 2022 Boy Scouts plan to exit bankruptcy approved, signaling end to largest sex abuse case of its kind. A federal judge gave final approval to the Boy Scouts of America's plan to exit bankruptcy Thursday, marking an end to the largest sexual abuse case against a single organization in American history. Sep 8, 2022 ------- How the Catholic Priesthood Became an Unlikely Haven for Many Gay Men BY ROSS BENES APRIL 20, 2017 8:15 AM http://Slate.com In a survey of several thousand priests in the U.S., the Los Angeles Times found that 28 percent of priests between the ages of 46 and 55 reported that they were gay. This statistic was higher than the percentages found in other age brackets and reflected the outflow of straight priests throughout the 1970s and ’80s. The high number of gay priests also became evident in the 1980s, when the priesthood was hit hard by the AIDS crisis that was afflicting the gay community. The Kansas City Star estimated that at least 300 U.S. priests suffered AIDS-related deaths between the mid-1980s and 1999. The Star concluded that priests were about twice as likely as other adult men to die from AIDS. So how many gay priests actually exist? Most surveys (which, due to the sensitivity of the subject, admittedly suffer from limited samples and other design issues) find between 15 percent and 50 percent of U.S. priests are gay, which is much greater than the 3.8 percent of people who identify as LGBTQ in the general population. It’s not as if the church is unaware of this issue. A past president of the USCCB complained about an “ongoing struggle to make sure that the Catholic priesthood is not dominated by homosexual men.” ----- Published studies show over 80% of the Catholic victims were male. 100% of the Boy Scout victims were male. A young female, because the world is over 96% heterosexual and thus most pedophiles, or airline pilots, or surgeons, or astronauts come from that 96%, is statistically 3 times more likely to be a pedophile victim than a young male. If the Catholic Priest pedophilia scandal was primarily heterosexual pedophilia, there would have been overwhelming huge numbers of Catholic young female victims, 3 to 1 outnumbering male victims. But over 80% of the over 200,000 Catholic pedophile victims were young males. The results confirm the (above) studies
Click to expand...


For posterity, and my reference. Thanks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
#3,580
#3,580
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83, StarRaider, AM64 and 2 others
#3,582
#3,582
lawgator1 said:
I literally NEVER see this "problem," or "issue."

But I feel the effects of economic problems every single day. I worry about world stability, especially the war in Ukraine. We hear about crime every day in our communities and have to take steps to prevent it. Roads need work. Air travel is overburdened. We have a labor shortage and uneven inflation.

I'd prefer the Republicans govern on these issues for at least a little bit before dying on the transgender hill for Army vets.

The GOP priorities are dangerously out of whack and may well explain why they did not have the success they thought they'd have in 2022.
Click to expand...
You’re right. The GOP should focus on the items the Democrats have been focusing on in Memphis, Detroit, San Francisco, Baltimore, Chicago …..on and on…. Because they’ve been so successful
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83, SpaceCoastVol, AM64 and 1 other person
#3,584
#3,584
Franklin Pierce said:
Pink-haired Portland Surgeon who performs Sex-Change Surgery on Trans CHILDREN admits they Face Lifetime of Infertility, Incontinence and Sexual Dissatisfaction, in now-deleted video

  • Horrified viewers likened the 'evil' procedures to Nazi-era experiments
A surgeon dubbed Dr Frankenstein has candidly revealed the downsides of performing genital re-shaping surgeries on transgender children and adults, in a video which has since been deleted.

In the video, Dr Blair Peters, a self-described 'queer surgeon' with 'he/they' pronouns, pink hair and a 'passion' for genital surgeries, says patients face fertility, sexual pleasure and other lifelong post-op complications.

Perhaps more concerning is how Dr Peters — who works at one of America's most progressive hospitals — presents his procedures, some of which involve robotics, as experimental.

Surgically altering male and female genitals to match those of the opposite sex, or simply removing patients' privates altogether, are widely understood to be tough and problematic procedures.

73224217-12299393-image-a-9_1689355579534.jpg

Oregon's pink-haired 'queersurgeon' has tens of thousands of followers on social media

Portland surgeon dubbed 'Dr Frankenstein' reveals drawbacks of his genital ops on trans adolescents | Daily Mail Online
Click to expand...

WTF is a progressive hospital? How is that even a thing?
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77, UT_Dutchman, marcusluvsvols and 2 others
#3,585
#3,585
85SugarVol said:
Now we’re talking!



Yo @PEPPERJAX
These cats know how to do a ritual.
Click to expand...

I saw the picture and comments in the article about the rainbow flag in the trash can. That brings up a question - I wonder if you can burn a rainbow flag like you could a US flag without it being considered a hate crime. It's another one of those things that the left stirred up when they stretched the 1st Amendment - seems like their stupidity always comes back to bite them in the azz.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77, 82_VOL_83, UT_Dutchman and 3 others
#3,586
#3,586
AM64 said:
I saw the picture and comments in the article about the rainbow flag in the trash can. That brings up a question - I wonder if you can burn a rainbow flag like you could a US flag without it being considered a hate crime. It's another one of those things that the left stirred up when they stretched the 1st Amendment - seems like their stupidity always comes back to bite them in the azz.
Click to expand...
I support anyone’s right to burn an American flag in protest.
I support anyone’s right to burn a Pride flag in protest.

I would imagine the Pride flag would illicit more negative feedback. But I could be wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and AM64
#3,587
#3,587
volfanhill said:
When did he use the word worship?
Click to expand...

He kept going on and on about how much he "loves" the "land beneath the feet" of people whose acts he considers to be vile and reprehensible (my words, but I feel that fairly and accurately represents the gist of his sentiments). Evidently, he equates "country/nation" with "land/dirt."

If a US citizen in 1943 had said that they "loved" Germany and Japan, I'd love to have been there to hear them explaining that he/she was simply referring to the land mass.

It all comes down to whether you consider a country to be identified more by its literal land mass or by its citizenry and their actions.
 
#3,588
#3,588
85SugarVol said:
I support anyone’s right to burn an American flag in protest.
I support anyone’s right to burn a Pride flag in protest.

I would imagine the Pride flag would illicit more negative feedback. But I could be wrong.
Click to expand...

I've always felt that it is wrong to burn (except for the proper flag disposal) the US or any other national flag. There was a statute that made flag desecration illegal with penalties, but it was overruled by one of the liberal supreme courts with the 1st Amendment as the basis. For that kind of thing to hold, any law since then that restrains speech or acts that don't physically harm someone should be disallowed and "hate speech" should never be a thing. It's one way or the other. I can't see either bodily harm or harm to property as protected actions under free speech or anything else. Otherwise why just not murder someone and claim "I really despised that guy and I spoke most emphatically just how much."
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77, 82_VOL_83, UT_Dutchman and 1 other person
#3,589
#3,589
This is relevant and perhaps the best Tucker i have ever heard. No longer shackled by Fox producers, editors, or OWNERS ( Disney/ABC liberals now own Fox) he is able to say what he wants without censorship.



He touches on 1 thing and it got me thinking...i know this sounds crazy, and that correlation isnt causation etc...but check this out.

20-25 years ago: scientists definitely prove that "forever chemicals" in the water supply are turning frogs gay in California. To the point that it could even lead to their eventual extinction as obviously they cannot reproduce ...scientists are ridiculed and media downplays the evidence. Just a sound byte before being swept under the rug by the MSM. As usual.

Today, study after study and poll after poll puts Americans in Gen Z (born 1997- 2004) at 20% gay. Twenty. 20% gay. Versus a meager 2% for the preceeding millenials, Gen X (these kids parents) boomers and everyone in between. All polled at about 2% gay on average. So the amount of gay folks increased by an order of magnitude (10x) in a decade or so...according to several different sources i have seen with that 20% figure being the new "norm"...

I just read an article (1 of several) that came out this week telling folks in NC to NOT eat the fish coming from our rivers in NC due to the presence of "forever chemicals " which are also in our drinking water because the filtration process does NOT remove these chemicals (nor all the female hormones from birth control) when our drinking water is recycled at treatment plants for relatively large cities like Charlotte (over 1 million people. Greater Charlotte closer to 2 million folks btw) as well as Raleigh, Greensboro, Wilmington etc etc..

To be clear, I am not saying that these chemicals now found apparently contaminating nearly all freshwater definitely caused the Tenfold increase in gay folks...it would take huge peer reviewed studies over ample time to conclude a direct causation. There are social conditions and even pressures these days to be a part of this growing LGBT community etc that I think certainly contribute...in liberal society it seems like a badge of honor to have a gay, "trans" etc child in the same vein that in the early 2000s it was trendy among them to adopt kids from Africa and Asia to be like Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie. It seems to be the new "stylish " thing to be for lefties in the US.

There are certainly a lot of factors in whats happening in society today, making it a very complicated situation. I think gay folks have had their acronym hijacked by the trans movement and others recently also, putting them in a tough situation publicly when in my opinion gay/lesbian folks have mostly just wanted to be left alone for rhe last 40 years...which is their absolute right as humans. I find this new wrinkle regarding chemicals and hormones in our water supply quite interesting though...and as Tucker points out...I am sure our government wants no part of a public discussion or scientific studies to see if perhaps these things are responsible for the huge change. Just a random thought that occurred to me when watching this video... opinions welcome from anyone who cares to reply.

Go VOLS. Of all kinds. Always.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol and AM64
#3,590
#3,590
85SugarVol said:
I support anyone’s right to burn an American flag in protest.
I support anyone’s right to burn a Pride flag in protest.

I would imagine the Pride flag would illicit more negative feedback. But I could be wrong.
Click to expand...
No I am sure it would. Less than 1% of the country has hijacked the rest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman and AM64
#3,592
#3,592
marcusluvsvols said:
This is relevant and perhaps the best Tucker i have ever heard. No longer shackled by Fox producers, editors, or OWNERS ( Disney/ABC liberals now own Fox) he is able to say what he wants without censorship.



He touches on 1 thing and it got me thinking...i know this sounds crazy, and that correlation isnt causation etc...but check this out.

20-25 years ago: scientists definitely prove that "forever chemicals" in the water supply are turning frogs gay in California. To the point that it could even lead to their eventual extinction as obviously they cannot reproduce ...scientists are ridiculed and media downplays the evidence. Just a sound byte before being swept under the rug by the MSM. As usual.

Today, study after study and poll after poll puts Americans in Gen Z (born 1997- 2004) at 20% gay. Twenty. 20% gay. Versus a meager 2% for the preceeding millenials, Gen X (these kids parents) boomers and everyone in between. All polled at about 2% gay on average. So the amount of gay folks increased by an order of magnitude (10x) in a decade or so...according to several different sources i have seen with that 20% figure being the new "norm"...

I just read an article (1 of several) that came out this week telling folks in NC to NOT eat the fish coming from our rivers in NC due to the presence of "forever chemicals " which are also in our drinking water because the filtration process does NOT remove these chemicals (nor all the female hormones from birth control) when our drinking water is recycled at treatment plants for relatively large cities like Charlotte (over 1 million people. Greater Charlotte closer to 2 million folks btw) as well as Raleigh, Greensboro, Wilmington etc etc..

To be clear, I am not saying that these chemicals now found apparently contaminating nearly all freshwater definitely caused the Tenfold increase in gay folks...it would take huge peer reviewed studies over ample time to conclude a direct causation. There are social conditions and even pressures these days to be a part of this growing LGBT community etc that I think certainly contribute...in liberal society it seems like a badge of honor to have a gay, "trans" etc child in the same vein that in the early 2000s it was trendy among them to adopt kids from Africa and Asia to be like Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie. It seems to be the new "stylish " thing to be for lefties in the US.

There are certainly a lot of factors in whats happening in society today, making it a very complicated situation. I think gay folks have had their acronym hijacked by the trans movement and others recently also, putting them in a tough situation publicly when in my opinion gay/lesbian folks have mostly just wanted to be left alone for rhe last 40 years...which is their absolute right as humans. I find this new wrinkle regarding chemicals and hormones in our water supply quite interesting though...and as Tucker points out...I am sure our government wants no part of a public discussion or scientific studies to see if perhaps these things are responsible for the huge change. Just a random thought that occurred to me when watching this video... opinions welcome from anyone who cares to reply.

Go VOLS. Of all kinds. Always.
Click to expand...


Sounds like a huge reach, but there's that "never say never" thing, and we honestly don't know what we don't know. There have certainly been warnings over hormone treatment and their effect on the opposite sex and other warnings on drugs going down the drain, so who is to say that water borne contamination by drugs or other compounds that affect the mental state doesn't exist. It's almost impossible to fully trust scientific studies saying one way or the other because so many are funded by interested parties and some have been shown to be downright fraudulent. More than one medical journal has had to withdraw papers they published because of fraud in the study and conclusions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77 and marcusluvsvols
#3,593
#3,593
AM64 said:
I've always felt that it is wrong to burn (except for the proper flag disposal) the US or any other national flag. There was a statute that made flag desecration illegal with penalties, but it was overruled by one of the liberal supreme courts with the 1st Amendment as the basis. For that kind of thing to hold, any law since then that restrains speech or acts that don't physically harm someone should be disallowed and "hate speech" should never be a thing. It's one way or the other. I can't see either bodily harm or harm to property as protected actions under free speech or anything else. Otherwise why just not murder someone and claim "I really despised that guy and I spoke most emphatically just how much."
Click to expand...
Do what you wanna do. Just don’t hurt others.

“Hate Speech isn’t Free/Protected Speech” is one of the most ridiculous, and dangerous, ideas to emerge from the current maelstrom we find ourselves in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77, marcusluvsvols, BisonVol and 2 others
#3,596
#3,596
marcusluvsvols said:
This is relevant and perhaps the best Tucker i have ever heard. No longer shackled by Fox producers, editors, or OWNERS ( Disney/ABC liberals now own Fox) he is able to say what he wants without censorship.



He touches on 1 thing and it got me thinking...i know this sounds crazy, and that correlation isnt causation etc...but check this out.

20-25 years ago: scientists definitely prove that "forever chemicals" in the water supply are turning frogs gay in California. To the point that it could even lead to their eventual extinction as obviously they cannot reproduce ...scientists are ridiculed and media downplays the evidence. Just a sound byte before being swept under the rug by the MSM. As usual.

Today, study after study and poll after poll puts Americans in Gen Z (born 1997- 2004) at 20% gay. Twenty. 20% gay. Versus a meager 2% for the preceeding millenials, Gen X (these kids parents) boomers and everyone in between. All polled at about 2% gay on average. So the amount of gay folks increased by an order of magnitude (10x) in a decade or so...according to several different sources i have seen with that 20% figure being the new "norm"...

I just read an article (1 of several) that came out this week telling folks in NC to NOT eat the fish coming from our rivers in NC due to the presence of "forever chemicals " which are also in our drinking water because the filtration process does NOT remove these chemicals (nor all the female hormones from birth control) when our drinking water is recycled at treatment plants for relatively large cities like Charlotte (over 1 million people. Greater Charlotte closer to 2 million folks btw) as well as Raleigh, Greensboro, Wilmington etc etc..

To be clear, I am not saying that these chemicals now found apparently contaminating nearly all freshwater definitely caused the Tenfold increase in gay folks...it would take huge peer reviewed studies over ample time to conclude a direct causation. There are social conditions and even pressures these days to be a part of this growing LGBT community etc that I think certainly contribute...in liberal society it seems like a badge of honor to have a gay, "trans" etc child in the same vein that in the early 2000s it was trendy among them to adopt kids from Africa and Asia to be like Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie. It seems to be the new "stylish " thing to be for lefties in the US.

There are certainly a lot of factors in whats happening in society today, making it a very complicated situation. I think gay folks have had their acronym hijacked by the trans movement and others recently also, putting them in a tough situation publicly when in my opinion gay/lesbian folks have mostly just wanted to be left alone for rhe last 40 years...which is their absolute right as humans. I find this new wrinkle regarding chemicals and hormones in our water supply quite interesting though...and as Tucker points out...I am sure our government wants no part of a public discussion or scientific studies to see if perhaps these things are responsible for the huge change. Just a random thought that occurred to me when watching this video... opinions welcome from anyone who cares to reply.

Go VOLS. Of all kinds. Always.
Click to expand...


Gen Z is 3% gay and 2% lesbian, there mostly are more people willing to admit they're bisexual than there were in the past. This "theory" about chemicals turning people gay after turning frogs gay is stupid as hell.
 
#3,597
#3,597
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#3,598
#3,598
NashVol11 said:
Gen Z is 3% gay and 2% lesbian, there mostly are more people willing to admit they're bisexual than there were in the past. This "theory" about chemicals turning people gay after turning frogs gay is stupid as hell.
Click to expand...

The chemicals didn’t turn frogs gay. They turned them trans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, UT_Dutchman, AM64 and 1 other person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top