titansvolsfaninga
Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2013
- Messages
- 12,243
- Likes
- 17,329
we are talking about offensive philosophy....and the productivity. They are playing against MAC competition. so it is apples and apples. Last I checked, Cincinnati didn't play in the SEC either.
Would you throw the ball all day when you have Hurd, Kamara, and Dobbs which is one of the top rushing attacks in the nation? Passing game is important and could be better but our rushing attack is elite and should be our go-to this year.
I've seen this response from you to many of my posts. We appear to have different views, and that's fine. But it also appears that using any cognitive reasoning whatsoever is "overthinking" to you. Thus, we can just assume you view any future post from me as overthinking and we can save you the doltish response.
Here is a breakdown of the leading two WRs from all 13 games from last season. These stats are strictly showing the WR position, not TEs or RBs.
Bowling Green
Jauan Jennings 3 rec, 56 yards
Von Pearson 2 rec, 48 yards
10 rec, 171 yards, 17.1 avg yards per reception, 0 TDs
Oklahoma
Josh Smith 4 rec, 56 yards
Josh Malone 2 rec, 19 yards, 1 TD
11 rec, 115 yards, 10.5 avg yards per reception, 1 TD (Malone)
Western Carolina
Preston Williams 3 rec, 98 yards, 2 TDs
Josh Malone 4 rec, 33 yards
15 rec, 189 yards, 12.6 avg yards per reception, 2 TDs (Williams)
Florida
Josh Smith 1 rec, 6 yards
Jauan Jennings 1 rec, 1 yard
2 rec, 7 yards, 3.5 avg yards per reception, 0 TDs
*No third receiver made a reception
Arkansas
Josh Smith 2 rec, 34 yards
Von Pearson 3 rec, 30 yards
12 rec, 110 yards, 9.2 avg yards per reception, 0 TDs
Georgia
Josh Malone 5 rec, 60 yards, 1 TD
Preston Williams 2 rec, 41 yards
12 rec, 179 yards, 14.9 avg yards per reception, 1 TD (Malone)
Bama
Josh Malone 2 rec, 43 yards
Josh Smith 2 rec, 38 yards, 1 TD
8 rec, 122 yards, 15.3 avg yards per reception, 1 TD (Smith)
Kentucky
Josh Malone 4 rec, 103 yards, 1 TD (75 yard reception)
Von Pearson 5 rec, 37 yards
11 rec, 156 yards, 14.2 avg yards per reception, 1 TD (Malone)
*Only other receptions at WR: Jauan Jennings (1 for 11 yards) and Josh Smith (1 for 5 yards)
*If you remove the 75 bomb to Malone: 10 rec, 81 yards, 8.1 avg yards per reception
South Carolina
Von Pearson 8 rec, 121 yards, 1 TD
Josh Smith 3 rec, 42 yards
13 rec, 192 yards, 14.8 avg yards per reception, 1 TD (Pearson)
North Texas
Josh Malone 4 rec, 38 yards,
Josh Smith 2 rec, 28 yards
13 rec, 136 yards, 10.5 avg yards per reception, 0 TDs
Missouri
Josh Malone 2 rec, 35 yards
Von Pearson 7 rec, 28 yards
9 rec, 63 yards, 7 avg yards per reception, 0 TDs
*No third receiver made a reception
Vandy
Josh Smith 4 rec, 50 yards
Von Pearson 3 rec, 40 yards, 2 TDs
7 rec, 90 yards, 12.9 avg yards per reception, 2 TDs (Pearson)
*No third receiver made a reception
Northwestern
Von Pearson 2 rec, 32 yards
Josh Malone 2 rec, 17 yards
7 rec, 77 yards, 11 avg yards per reception, 0 TDs
UT had a WR with more than 100 yards receiving in a single game only twice.
Not in one game did UT have multiple WRs with receiving TDs.
For the season, UT had only 9 TD receptions by WRs.
That stat against UF is absolutely unacceptable. I wonder when was the last time UT only had 2 receptions at the WR position for an entire game.
Butch Jones' offense does not utilize the WR position. Once I looked up the stats from last season, I understood why Higgins chose Clemson. This may change once Dobbs graduates but it also may be more related to CBJ's scheme than people realize. I do not think Dobbs is as bad a passer as the offense makes him look. Time will tell. Hopefully our under utilization of our WRs (in addition to our over rotation) changes starting with this season.
Why is the stat against UF unacceptable? Our whole problem against the Gators for the past decade is that we couldn't get the running game going and now you're mad that we didn't throw the ball around?
And like the poster above me said, we signed Marquez Callaway and Tyler Byrd last year.
On top of that we got Jeff George and Brandon Johnson who are both solid. I do applaud you for going to such lengths to find something to complain about though, it can't be easy.
You're overthinking the "doltish" adjective.![]()
I think Dormady would improve our passing game immensely. Problem is I'm not sure Butch can adjust his offense to where QD could succeed. I know he said he could. Just not sure I buy it. I'd love to see our QBs lobbing fade routes to JM and PW 40 yards down field. It also opens up the running lanes.
I like the the part vs UK, "If you remove" like you are personally trying to make things look worse.
Jones certainly did not mold the offense for Worley or Peterman. I'm glad to see Peterman succeed at Pitt and it further points to CBJ's inability to adjust his offensive philosophy while at UT. He also stated that he would adjust his approach based on personnel when he was hired here (in response to a question about how he would utilize Worley's abilities/strengths).
Jones certainly did not mold the offense for Worley or Peterman. I'm glad to see Peterman succeed at Pitt and it further points to CBJ's inability to adjust his offensive philosophy while at UT. He also stated that he would adjust his approach based on personnel when he was hired here (in response to a question about how he would utilize Worley's abilities/strengths).
rather than coaching to WIN. That is why it is unacceptable. In the 2nd half of that game, especially the 4th qtr, TN went ultra conservative. Same approach as the year before when FL was in Knoxville and UT lead 9-0 at the half but went on to lose. TN dominated the run game last year against FL but still lost. TN dominated the passing game in 2014 and WON the turnover battle but still found a way to lose to FL. The current drought against FL has everything to do with coaching and psyche more than rushing yds, passing yds, or turnover margins.
On the positive, I applaud Butch for bringing in Bob Shoop who is a better and more accomplished DC than John Jancek. That was an aggressive move by Butch that certainly entails risk