hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 114,564
- Likes
- 162,730
I'm not the one defending a POTUS who wants to kill people that have done nothing to us.
You too.
Who is defending Obama? Am I the one accused of defending Obama?
Simply thinking you are a dick doesn't mean I agree with Obama.
The only thing I agree with Obama on is probably gay marriage. However, I was never against it to begin with.
Oh wow, now I'm offended. A person of your caliber thinks I'm a dick, how will I ever move on?
Kerry says 1,429 people died in the recent Syrian government chemical attack, 426 of them children. Other reports say that this is actually around the 10th or 11th use of chemical weapons by Syria, and that this one is basically a test of the rest of the world and whether it will do anything about it.
While I don't really know much or see a direct US interest in the outcome of the civil war there, it is getting to the point where it is pretty compelling justification for the US to act. Frankly, if we know Assad okayed it, I think a case can be made that an attack by us should in fact target him.
Anyone that would launch an attack of a chemical weapon on a civilian population and kills 400 kids gives up his right to govern, and only means to get him out of power at this point .....
How would you be able to tell what 'caliber' of person I am?
You accused me of defending Obama which means to me you are either lazy or stupid. So not sure your judgment should be trusted.
Either way I don't care.
Kerry says 1,429 people died in the recent Syrian government chemical attack, 426 of them children. Other reports say that this is actually around the 10th or 11th use of chemical weapons by Syria, and that this one is basically a test of the rest of the world and whether it will do anything about it.
While I don't really know much or see a direct US interest in the outcome of the civil war there, it is getting to the point where it is pretty compelling justification for the US to act. Frankly, if we know Assad okayed it, I think a case can be made that an attack by us should in fact target him.
Anyone that would launch an attack of a chemical weapon on a civilian population and kills 400 kids gives up his right to govern, and only means to get him out of power at this point .....
Congrats, you just justified IraqKerry says 1,429 people died in the recent Syrian government chemical attack, 426 of them children. Other reports say that this is actually around the 10th or 11th use of chemical weapons by Syria, and that this one is basically a test of the rest of the world and whether it will do anything about it.
While I don't really know much or see a direct US interest in the outcome of the civil war there, it is getting to the point where it is pretty compelling justification for the US to act. Frankly, if we know Assad okayed it, I think a case can be made that an attack by us should in fact target him.
Anyone that would launch an attack of a chemical weapon on a civilian population and kills 400 kids gives up his right to govern, and only means to get him out of power at this point .....
If we had evidence that he authorized killing civilians with chemical weapons, we should have targeted him. Invading the whole country probably not necessary.
Anyone that would launch an attack of a chemical weapon on a civilian population and kills 400 kids gives up his right to govern, and only means to get him out of power at this point .....