The rotation?

#51
#51
And he didn't play a great deal of minutes at the point you bafoon, he played less than 10 there.

He played as many minutes at the pt as the back up pt guard would play which you said wasn't possible since his simply a SF only.

I guess we played those 8min without a pt. I forgot about that book you are writing.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#52
#52
Show me that option that said to bench him the entire year. Add some colorful name calling why you are at it.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Here are your 2 options option 1 is bench him UNLESS there is fouls trouble, we've had foul trouble 1 time this year do yea your pretty much saying bench him.

Option 1) Continue to play the rotation we have settled on with Stokes only playing if serious foul trouble occurs or games are out of hand.

Result: The team will continue to progress and in the short term this option will produce the best results for this team. The team chemistry will continue on its current path which from everything I can see is very good.

Option 2) Eliminate Yemi's minutes and insert Stokes into the rotation.

Results: In the short term I think the team will digress slightly mainly due to chemistry issues. I feel that the team will be resentful of Stokes in some small degree but after a short period of time the results will begin to turn in a positive fashion.
 
#53
#53
No more read what I said. Tatum brought it up but handed it to mcbee and mcbee ran our offense as the pg. ct brought it up the floor as the pg, maymon also brought it up the floor like a pg. what I'm saying if your looking purely at position ct didn't play pg you idiot he brought the ball up the court and mcbee was our pg. if you knew anything about basketball you'd know this by seeing who has the ball at the too of they key and is setting things up and calling plays that was mcbee. Another way to see who the pg is is by seeing who guards the opposing of, that was also mcbee. Here's a question lebron James brings the ball up the court 99% of the time is he the pg or is Mario chalmers? That's what I thought.

So Mcbee played the pt now. Keep grasping at straws. CT played the PT and its entirely possible he continues to do so. End of story.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#54
#54
So Mcbee played the pt now. Keep grasping at straws. CT played the PT and its entirely possible he continues to do so. End of story.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Are you this dumb or is it an act? Yes someone besides golden and Richardson had to play the point today, I don't give a cral who it was. The point is, that unless Richardson is in foul trouble again it won't happen, Richardson is our backup pg and that won't change. As stated if something happens like an injury or like foul trouble yes someone will have to assume that role obviously, mcbee tatum McRae and maymon all saw time with bringing it up the court so sure theres your 3rd 4th 5th and even 6th string at pg for when we need it. Do you not get Richardson is our back up pg? He was in foul trouble for the first time so when golden and Richardson was out, which doesn't happen if Richardson isn't in foul trouble, then yes someone else will play point. But the fact that you are stating adamantly that tatum will see back up pg minutes is nothing short of idiotic.

If you would like we can place a wager as to whether or not tatum sees minutes at the back up point against uga.
 
#55
#55
Are you this dumb or is it an act? Yes someone besides golden and Richardson had to play the point today, I don't give a cral who it was. The point is, that unless Richardson is in foul trouble again it won't happen, Richardson is our backup pg and that won't change. As stated if something happens like an injury or like foul trouble yes someone will have to assume that role obviously, mcbee tatum McRae and maymon all saw time with bringing it up the court so sure theres your 3rd 4th 5th and even 6th string at pg for when we need it. Do you not get Richardson is our back up pg? He was in foul trouble for the first time so when golden and Richardson was out, which doesn't happen if Richardson isn't in foul trouble, then yes someone else will play point. But the fact that you are stating adamantly that tatum will see back up pg minutes is nothing short of idiotic.

If you would like we can place a wager as to whether or not tatum sees minutes at the back up point against uga.

The bet with Tatum playing there against GA would be 50/50. You could be right for sure but you have used the word NEVER and that is a big difference in our stances.

The sad part is where is Waspun in this discussion. We can't give up totally on him IMO.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#56
#56
Way to man up you ask me to show you a post that you made I do and then you run away. Seriously learn something, anything about basketball before you come back on here. Your stupidity is making everyone else on this board dumber. Start with this:

IT IS POSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE TO BRING THE BALL UP THE COURT WITHOUT BEING THE PG.

1. Maymon brings it up
2. McRae brings it up
3. Lebron James brings it up
4. Dwayne wade brings it up if no lebron
5. Kobe brings it up

Do you need more because I can keep going...

Just because the person dribbles a ball up the court doesn't make them your pg.
 
#57
#57
The bet with Tatum playing there against GA would be 50/50. You could be right for sure but you have used the word NEVER and that is a big difference in our stances.

The sad part is where is Waspun in this discussion. We can't give up totally on him IMO.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Ok your right maybe not neve but Tatum has as much of a chance being our pg as maymon. If golden, mcbee and Richardson were to all go to Nashville toting guns and weed and get suspended or kicked of then yes probably tatum would play pg. oh and Wes would have to have been in the car with them too. In order for tatum to see playing time at pg very major things would have to happen like golden mcbee and Richardson being in foul trouble. You stated YOU THOUGHT TATUM WOULD START SEEING TIME AT BACK UP PG.
 
#58
#58
Here are your 2 options option 1 is bench him UNLESS there is fouls trouble, we've had foul trouble 1 time this year do yea your pretty much saying bench him.

Option 1) Continue to play the rotation we have settled on with Stokes only playing if serious foul trouble occurs or games are out of hand.

Result: The team will continue to progress and in the short term this option will produce the best results for this team. The team chemistry will continue on its current path which from everything I can see is very good.

Option 2) Eliminate Yemi's minutes and insert Stokes into the rotation.

Results: In the short term I think the team will digress slightly mainly due to chemistry issues. I feel that the team will be resentful of Stokes in some small degree but after a short period of time the results will begin to turn in a positive fashion.

Option 1 doesn't say to bench him all year. Show me where it does besides These options were presented as the choices CM had in the present and not based on all year.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#59
#59
Continue whatever Coach Zo wants it to be. This is a developmental year. Next year is the big splash year.
 
#60
#60
Option 1 doesn't say to bench him all year. Show me where it does besides These options were presented as the choices CM had in the present and not based on all year.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Seriously...you stated plaay the rotation we have been and PLAY HIM ONLY IF SERIOUS FOUL TROUBLE OCCURS!!! We have had serious foul trouble from our post in ONE GAME. So by your theory he should have played in one previous game for a few minutes, that is pretty much a benching, he would be taking Dwight millers place on the bench.
 
#61
#61
Ok your right maybe not neve but Tatum has as much of a chance being our pg as maymon.


You stated YOU THOUGHT TATUM WOULD START SEEING TIME AT BACK UP PG.

You can't argue with ignorant statements like the first one especially when it was already disproved yesterday.


I said it was entirely possible that Tatum moves into that role after watching yesterday.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#63
#63
You can't argue with ignorant statements like the first one especially when it was already disproved yesterday.


I said it was entirely possible that Tatum moves into that role after watching yesterday.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

And it is not possible, unless as I said some crazy unforeseen things happen in which golden Richardson and mcbee aren't available.
 
#65
#65
Seriously...you stated plaay the rotation we have been and PLAY HIM ONLY IF SERIOUS FOUL TROUBLE OCCURS!!! We have had serious foul trouble from our post in ONE GAME. So by your theory he should have played in one previous game for a few minutes, that is pretty much a benching, he would be taking Dwight millers place on the bench.


Stated as an option for the short term not all year and one I didn't endorse if you read the thread.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#66
#66
Stated as an option for the short term not all year and one I didn't endorse if you read the thread.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Option 1) Continue to play the rotation we have settled on with Stokes only playing if serious foul trouble occurs or games are out of hand.

Result: The team will continue to progress and in the short term this option will produce the best results for this team. The team chemistry will continue on its current path which from everything I can see is very good.

.....

You talk about how this option will be good for the team and improve their team chemistry. WRONG AND WRONG AGAIN
 
#68
#68
Here is option 2 THE ONE YOU CHOSE...

Option 2) Eliminate Yemi's minutes and insert Stokes into the rotation.

Results: In the short term I think the team will digress slightly mainly due to chemistry issues. I feel that the team will be resentful of Stokes in some small degree but after a short period of time the results will begin to turn in a positive fashion.

...
So get stokes 5-8 minutes a game and this will hurt the team. Well you clearly were wrong on that one after THE FIRST HALF. And yet you refer to me not knowin basketball, and retracting my statements.
 
#70
#70
You don't sign a free agent in the middle of the season to sit him on the bench

Exactly! Stokes even though he is a good kid would have been pissed as well as all the fan base and rightfully so. You have this talent for a year and a half most likely, you ride it for everything he's got.
 
#72
#72
Do what cal did last year (I think) play the **** outta stokes and when people start complaining ask them to stand up, tell whose minutes they deserve to have and why. When **** gets real players stfu
 
#73
#73
About Yemi...

what was his background?

He is from Nigeria? Pretty sure on that. He has only played basketball for about 3 years, always played soccer as a kid. Came to the is via the program they have over there trying to identify foreign talent and bring them here. He played backup center last year in hs to a good d1 player, name slips my mind. He is very raw but shows some promise, he rattled off 18 points in a row, yes IN A ROW, earlier this year and had a double double. Teamstes told him keep scoring get a double double and he replied what is that. Good kid reminds you a lot of negedu if you remember him?
 
#75
#75
Do what cal did last year (I think) play the **** outta stokes and when people start complaining ask them to stand up, tell whose minutes they deserve to have and why. When **** gets real players stfu

I assume your referring to someone besides stokes on uk, I was just curious who? Yea though if you have a talent like that you play him as much as he can take and if someone is mad about losing minutes tell them to beat him in practice.
 

VN Store



Back
Top