The Russia Hoax: The Illicit Scheme to Clear Hillary Clinton and Frame Donald Trump

[hUTch2002]

Notice how a thread with undisputed facts of this treasonous travesty is avoided like the plague by the leftists of the board ? Man up and show up apparently just isn’t on the loudmouth Russiagate pushers agenda. The backbones of a soft shell crab.

Now now. BowlBrothers will be along anytime now to confirm that he has seen direct evidence of Trump being a Russian asset.

 

[DC_Vol]

Now now. BowlBrothers will be along anytime now to confirm that he has seen direct evidence of Trump being a Russian asset.

If you the allegations that were always made without fact couldn’t convince you this was a hoax, LG going all in should have been a dead giveaway. Nobody here has worst instincts.

 

[Orangeburst]

National Security Adviser Sullivan is 'foreign policy advisor' in former Clinton lawyer indictment: sources | Fox News

A conspiracy to smear and overthrow a duly elected President. Everything they accused Trump, they were guilty themselves. Dang Salkinsky style.

 

[Mose Phillip's Watch]

Adam Schiff should be locked up & cnn shut down for detrimental duties to the public for wrongful swaying an election

 

[BreatheUT]

Adam Schiff should be locked up & cnn shut down for detrimental duties to the public for wrongful swaying an election

They are like bad prognosticators. They know their takes are stupid and built on a house of cards, but they never have to answer for them sometime later when they are exposed as ludicrous. Their sheep fawn over them but are nowhere to be found once they are exposed.

 

[Franklin Pierce]

Washington Post Corrects, Removes reporting that relied on discredited anti-Trump Steele dossier

Paper ‘took the unusual step of correcting and removing large portions of two articles,’ in-house media reporter wrote

The Washington Post did something many other liberal outlets have failed to do and corrected previous reporting that relied on the discredited Steele dossier that accused former President Donald Trump of an extensive conspiracy with the Russians.

"The Washington Post on Friday took the unusual step of correcting and removing large portions of two articles, published in March 2017 and February 2019, that had identified a Belarusan American businessman as a key source of the ‘Steele dossier,’ a collection of largely unverified reports that claimed the Russian government had compromising information about then-candidate Donald Trump," Post media reporter Paul Farhi wrote.

"The newspaper’s executive editor, Sally Buzbee, said The Post could no longer stand by the accuracy of those elements of the story. It had identified businessman Sergei Millian as ‘Source D,’ the unnamed figure who passed on the most salacious allegation in the dossier to its principal author, former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele," Farhi continued.

Washington Post corrects, removes reporting that relied on discredited anti-Trump Steele dossier

 

[JOEY'S ALL VOL !!!]

Washington Post Corrects, Removes reporting that relied on discredited anti-Trump Steele dossier

Paper ‘took the unusual step of correcting and removing large portions of two articles,’ in-house media reporter wrote

The Washington Post did something many other liberal outlets have failed to do and corrected previous reporting that relied on the discredited Steele dossier that accused former President Donald Trump of an extensive conspiracy with the Russians.

"The Washington Post on Friday took the unusual step of correcting and removing large portions of two articles, published in March 2017 and February 2019, that had identified a Belarusan American businessman as a key source of the ‘Steele dossier,’ a collection of largely unverified reports that claimed the Russian government had compromising information about then-candidate Donald Trump," Post media reporter Paul Farhi wrote.

"The newspaper’s executive editor, Sally Buzbee, said The Post could no longer stand by the accuracy of those elements of the story. It had identified businessman Sergei Millian as ‘Source D,’ the unnamed figure who passed on the most salacious allegation in the dossier to its principal author, former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele," Farhi continued.

Washington Post corrects, removes reporting that relied on discredited anti-Trump Steele dossier

A big whoopee. It’s all too little and too late, the damage has already been done, they didn’t give a damn about the truth then and they don’t give a damn about the truth now.

 

[Orangeburst]

A big whoopee. It’s all too little and too late, the damage has already been done, they didn’t give a damn about the truth then and they don’t give a damn about the truth now.

No kidding, 4 years of lies and disruption that put this nation in such a serious spot, Much more than the 1/6 crap, which was a reaction to those lies.

 

[Franklin Pierce]

Washington Post columnist demands CNN retract 'corroboration' claim about Steele dossier | Daily Mail Online

Washington Post columnist demands CNN retract claim that Steele dossier had been 'partly corroborated' after key source was arrested for lying - as paper corrects its own stories

A Washington Post columnist has sharply criticized CNN for failing to retract its claim that British ex-spy Christopher Steele's dossier is 'corroborated,' following a federal indictment that raised serious questions about the document.

 

[VolnJC]

Now now. BowlBrothers will be along anytime now to confirm that he has seen direct evidence of Trump being a Russian asset.

I still celebrate the anniversary of the day that I finally decided to block that troll

 

[hUTch2002]

I still celebrate the anniversary of the day that I finally decided to block that troll

To each their own but I never block anyone. I like seeing the different opinions, even if I don’t agree with them in the least. Plus, I’m in the sports forums often as well and I may disagree with someone politically but on the sports side we may have more common ground. I’m pretty sure BB falls into this category actually.

 

[VolnJC]

Maddow pushed this nightly for over a year.. Schiff..promised that he had evidence of Trump collusion

 

[Franklin Pierce]

Axios warns about 'reckoning' on news outlets that touted the Steele dossier

Steele dossier was hyped by liberal outlets to attack former President Trump

Axios had harsh words for news outlets who touted the Christopher Steele dossier for years, despite much of the report being uncorroborated.

The Steele dossier, a document funded by the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign through law firm Perkins Coie, was comprised by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele in 2017. The dossier provided several salacious rumors involving former President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin and formed the basis for Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants against Trump campaign aide Carter Page.

However, on November 4, federal agents arrested the primary sub-source of the Steele dossier, Ivan Danchenko, as part of Special Counsel John Durham’s investigations. Danchenko was charged with five counts of making false statements to the FBI.

Axios reporter Sara Fischer noted, these same outlets have been reluctant to admit their mistakes.

"It's one of the most egregious journalistic errors in modern history, and the media's response to its own mistakes has so far been tepid," Fischer wrote.

"Outsized coverage of the unvetted document drove a media frenzy at the start of Donald Trump's presidency that helped drive a narrative of collusion between former President Trump and Russia," Fischer added. "It also helped drive an even bigger wedge between former President Trump and the press at the very beginning of his presidency."

Axios warns about 'reckoning' on news outlets that touted the Steele dossier

 

[Franklin Pierce]

Mar-a-Lago trespasser Deported to China 2 years later

The pandemic delayed her return to China.

In this court sketch, Yujing Zhang, left, a Chinese woman charged with lying to illegally enter President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago club, listens to a hearing on April 15, 2019 in West Palm Beach, Fla. | Daniel Pontet/AP Photo

PALM BEACH, Fla. — A Chinese businesswoman convicted of trespassing at President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club and lying to Secret Service agents was deported over the weekend, federal authorities said, more than two years after serving her sentence.

Yujing Zhang was turned over to immigration officials in December 2019 after serving her eight-month sentence. But she was held at the Glades County Detention Center for three times as long as her prison term mainly because of deportation delays during the Covid-19 pandemic, immigration authorities told the Miami Herald.

It’s unclear what Zhang’s motives were, but the judge said it was clearly about more than getting a photo opportunity.

Mar-a-Lago trespasser deported to China 2 years later

 

[Franklin Pierce]

 

[JOEY'S ALL VOL !!!]

This thread didn't age well for some.

And of course they aren’t around to taste the sour milk they poured.

 

[volinbham]

Adam Schiff, Steele dossier and the death of shame in American politics

 

[NCFisher]

If you the allegations that were always made without fact couldn’t convince you this was a hoax, LG going all in should have been a dead giveaway. Nobody here has worst instincts.

I made a strong Vegas wager against LG's 'water is wet' assertion.
Gonna' make a bundle.

 

[JOEY'S ALL VOL !!!]

Adam Schiff, Steele dossier and the death of shame in American politics

Watched that interview, a lying scumbag to the bitter end. He should be hanging from the end of a rope.

 

[NCFisher]

Washington Post Corrects, Removes reporting that relied on discredited anti-Trump Steele dossier

Paper ‘took the unusual step of correcting and removing large portions of two articles,’ in-house media reporter wrote

The Washington Post did something many other liberal outlets have failed to do and corrected previous reporting that relied on the discredited Steele dossier that accused former President Donald Trump of an extensive conspiracy with the Russians.

"The Washington Post on Friday took the unusual step of correcting and removing large portions of two articles, published in March 2017 and February 2019, that had identified a Belarusan American businessman as a key source of the ‘Steele dossier,’ a collection of largely unverified reports that claimed the Russian government had compromising information about then-candidate Donald Trump," Post media reporter Paul Farhi wrote.

"The newspaper’s executive editor, Sally Buzbee, said The Post could no longer stand by the accuracy of those elements of the story. It had identified businessman Sergei Millian as ‘Source D,’ the unnamed figure who passed on the most salacious allegation in the dossier to its principal author, former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele," Farhi continued.

Washington Post corrects, removes reporting that relied on discredited anti-Trump Steele dossier

Kash Patel, former Deputy to Director of ODNI, was interviewed by Jan Jekelek and stated another guy of high interest is Charles Dolan. Fiona Hill introduced the now indicted Danchenko to Steele, and DNC/Clinton operative and friend Dolan to them. Dolan appears to be the information pipeline to Danchenko, who then fed Steele.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hill testified to congress she had no idea how the dossier was created. The FBI wrote, “Steele said Fiona Hill knows that the primary subsource,” Danchenko, "was involved in the dossier,” and “when the primary subsource went to ground in January and February 2017, Steele contacted Hill and told Hill that he was worried about the primary subsource." and “Hill has a very high opinion of the primary subsource, and she told Steele that he and Orbis should take a look at him," the FBI wrote of Steele's comments. "Hill is one of Steele’s close friends.” Dossier critic Fiona Hill introduced main source to Steele — and, Durham says, 'PR Exec-1'
------------------------------------------------------------------
Former acting Director ODNI Richard Grennell is more direct: "DC newsrooms protected Fiona Hill and allowed her to tell lies to further her career. She’ll say anything to climb the ladder. I worked closely with her. She is a serial liar."

Back to Kash Patel re: the obstruction to investigating the Russia collusion hoax.
“I’m the lead Russia guy, and I had never heard of this guy (Dolan),” Patel said. “It means, to me, the FBI, DOJ under Rod Rosenstein withheld information that was critical to the Russiagate investigation that we were running in 2017, 2018. And who knows what else they’ve left out?”

The House Intelligence Committee, headed by Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) while Republicans controlled the House following the election, sent letters and subpoenas to the FBI and Department of Justice for all documentation relating to the dossier, including all the connections that he and the FBI had throughout the scandal known as Russiagate, Patel said on his show.

“Charles Dolan never came up once. Me nor not one member of my team, nor any of the Republicans on House Intel, had ever heard of Charles Dolan until John Durham’s indictment,” Patel said, referring to Special Counsel John Durham.

As further evidence of what he described as the FBI and DOJ purposefully withholding information, Patel pointed to how the indictment reveals agents interviewed Danchenko on five different occasions. According to DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s 2019 examination of the dossier and related matters, only three interviews with Danchenko took place.

“They did not admit that to us when we were investigating the Russiagate investigation. I think we added at most two or three instances of an interview and we never got the full contents anyway,” Patel said. “Now there’s five. Where did that come from?”

“Why didn’t the FBI tell us this,” he added later. “Why did Rod Rosenstein withhold these documents and this information, even though Congress sent him subpoenas? They only turned over part of it, and what they did turn over, a lot of it was redacted. And that’s why we’re fighting such an uphill battle to disclose it to the American public, the full story.”
Charles Dolan's Involvement in Dossier Means DOJ, FBI Withheld Information: Kash Patel

 

[NCFisher]

Adam Schiff, Steele dossier and the death of shame in American politics

The presidential and congressional candidates who'd support vigorous application of slander and defamation laws against congress and presidents, would take lead positions in my support bracket.
I still want to slap people awake - vigorously - who think weaponization of our most dangerous bureaucratic federal entities because 'Trump', is perfectly fine or less dangerous than our geopolitical enemies.

 

[JOEY'S ALL VOL !!!]

Kash Patel, former Deputy to Director of ODNI, was interviewed by Jan Jekelek and stated another guy of high interest is Charles Dolan. Fiona Hill introduced the now indicted Danchenko to Steele, and DNC/Clinton operative and friend Dolan to them. Dolan appears to be the information pipeline to Danchenko, who then fed Steele.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hill testified to congress she had no idea how the dossier was created. The FBI wrote, “Steele said Fiona Hill knows that the primary subsource,” Danchenko, "was involved in the dossier,” and “when the primary subsource went to ground in January and February 2017, Steele contacted Hill and told Hill that he was worried about the primary subsource." and “Hill has a very high opinion of the primary subsource, and she told Steele that he and Orbis should take a look at him," the FBI wrote of Steele's comments. "Hill is one of Steele’s close friends.” Dossier critic Fiona Hill introduced main source to Steele — and, Durham says, 'PR Exec-1'
------------------------------------------------------------------
Former acting Director ODNI Richard Grennell is more direct: "DC newsrooms protected Fiona Hill and allowed her to tell lies to further her career. She’ll say anything to climb the ladder. I worked closely with her. She is a serial liar."

Back to Kash Patel re: the obstruction to investigating the Russia collusion hoax.
“I’m the lead Russia guy, and I had never heard of this guy (Dolan),” Patel said. “It means, to me, the FBI, DOJ under Rod Rosenstein withheld information that was critical to the Russiagate investigation that we were running in 2017, 2018. And who knows what else they’ve left out?”

The House Intelligence Committee, headed by Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) while Republicans controlled the House following the election, sent letters and subpoenas to the FBI and Department of Justice for all documentation relating to the dossier, including all the connections that he and the FBI had throughout the scandal known as Russiagate, Patel said on his show.

“Charles Dolan never came up once. Me nor not one member of my team, nor any of the Republicans on House Intel, had ever heard of Charles Dolan until John Durham’s indictment,” Patel said, referring to Special Counsel John Durham.

As further evidence of what he described as the FBI and DOJ purposefully withholding information, Patel pointed to how the indictment reveals agents interviewed Danchenko on five different occasions. According to DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s 2019 examination of the dossier and related matters, only three interviews with Danchenko took place.

“They did not admit that to us when we were investigating the Russiagate investigation. I think we added at most two or three instances of an interview and we never got the full contents anyway,” Patel said. “Now there’s five. Where did that come from?”

“Why didn’t the FBI tell us this,” he added later. “Why did Rod Rosenstein withhold these documents and this information, even though Congress sent him subpoenas? They only turned over part of it, and what they did turn over, a lot of it was redacted. And that’s why we’re fighting such an uphill battle to disclose it to the American public, the full story.”
Charles Dolan's Involvement in Dossier Means DOJ, FBI Withheld Information: Kash Patel

It is astoundingly sad that this shiz is allowed to continue, today’s FBI is corrupt to the very core, there should be indictments coming down in droves. Completely embarrassing for the country. Burn it down !

 

[NCFisher]

It is astoundingly sad that this shiz is allowed to continue, today’s FBI is corrupt to the very core, there should be indictments coming down in droves. Completely embarrassing for the country. Burn it down !

I don't know that key players will get what they deserve - I want bodies hanging from the gates of 1600 Pennsylvania - but have understood the enormous task Durham has here. As Patel mentioned in interview, he personally had cases that took 4-5 years to build and none approached a fraction of the scale that Durham is working on.

If Garland dares to shut Durham down, DC should be turned into Kenosha 2020. Given several opportunities, Garland refrained from making that commitment to let Durham conclude.

 

[JOEY'S ALL VOL !!!]

I don't know that key players will get what they deserve - I want bodies hanging from the gates of 1600 Pennsylvania - but have understood the enormous task Durham has here. As Patel mentioned in interview, he personally had cases that took 4-5 years to build and none approached a fraction of the scale that Durham is working on.

If Garland dares to shut Durham down, DC should be turned into Kenosha 2020. Given several opportunities, Garland refrained from making that commitment to let Durham conclude.

If history (especially political corruption history) has taught us anything, it’s that no big fish players ever get what they deserve. I’d make the wager this outcome will be no different, a few indictments for the little fish and scapegoats followed by slaps on the wrists and no real time involved. It is disgusting!

 

[NCFisher]

If history (especially political corruption history) has taught us anything, it’s that no big fish players ever get what they deserve. I’d make the wager this outcome will be no different, a few indictments for the little fish and scapegoats followed by slaps on the wrists and no real time involved. It is disgusting!

I don't disagree; the empirical evidence is not on the side of justice. I hope Durham is willing to operate with the same ruthlessness that Mueller and Weismann brought to bear; wave indictments at the smaller fish, financially bankrupt them in their defense, leave no stones unturned re: family members if need be. It's simply too perilous not to.