The Section 103 Postgame Report.

#54
#54
Great hustle play. That's the perfect example of why he's in the game, and Woolridge is glued to the bench.

+1

Pearl doesn't do much for you, but he doesn't hurt you. And he hustles like no one else on this team. I think it's about time for people to stop complaining about him getting PT.
 
#55
#55
+1

Pearl doesn't do much for you, but he doesn't hurt you. And he hustles like no one else on this team. I think it's about time for people to stop complaining about him getting PT.
You would think the other guys on the team would follow his lead in the hustle department.
 
#56
#56
+1

Pearl doesn't do much for you, but he doesn't hurt you. And he hustles like no one else on this team. I think it's about time for people to stop complaining about him getting PT.

Other than leading the 3 on 1 fast break against Florida, there has been very little to complain about with him the last few games. He's been solid and much more of a contributor than Woolridge could be.

If he could learn to shoot a 3 at the top of the key and get whoever is guarding him out of the lane a bit more, he would open up our offense a lot.
 
#58
#58
+1

Pearl doesn't do much for you, but he doesn't hurt you. And he hustles like no one else on this team. I think it's about time for people to stop complaining about him getting PT.

I think most have came around to understanding that he is as good as any defensive player we have. Offensivly he is not a scorer but he has the ability to assist down the lane. He gives his all that is what I like.
 
#63
#63
What is incorrect about that statement?

stop trying to figure out what im thinking and just read my posts. i didnt say anything about it being incorrect. i just dont understand why you brought up woolridge when talking about a good play made by pearl.
 
#64
#64
stop trying to figure out what im thinking and just read my posts. i didnt say anything about it being incorrect. i just dont understand why you brought up woolridge when talking about a good play made by pearl.

Steven Pearl beat out Woolridge fair and square. People have been on here *****ing about it for weeks. And that play was "exhibit a" as to why it was the right decision. That wasn't bashing Woolridge; it was just stating the truth. Sorry if that hurts your feelings.
 
#65
#65
Steven Pearl beat out Woolridge fair and square. People have been on here *****ing about it for weeks. And that play was "exhibit a" as to why it was the right decision. That wasn't bashing Woolridge; it was just stating the truth. Sorry if that hurts your feelings.

it didnt "hurt my feelings"... it just takes away from how good pearl's play was when you add in a something unnecessary about woolridge sucking
 
#66
#66
it didnt "hurt my feelings"... it just takes away from how good pearl's play was when you add in a something unnecessary about woolridge sucking

Nothing I said took anything away from Pearl's play. You must not be able to comprehend or something. I clearly stated that that play in and of itself proved that playing Pearl over Woolridge is the right decision. How does that take anything away from Pearl?
 
#67
#67
Hat, I saw the article about the headband video, yet i saw a total of 7 people with headbands?! (That's counting Scotty n Wayne)
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#69
#69
Nothing I said took anything away from Pearl's play. You must not be able to comprehend or something. I clearly stated that that play in and of itself proved that playing Pearl over Woolridge is the right decision. How does that take anything away from Pearl?

1. you are going to talk about comprehension when all i did was ask a question about you having it in for woolridge (which you never actually answered).

2. it just adds a negative vibe to the entire comment. it seriously looks like you only complimented pearl so you could bash woolridge yet again. to be honest, i was taken aback that you actually typed his name rather than calling him swipersuck.

3. get over yourself. for real.
 
#70
#70
I would just like to say that seeing you two argue is making me lol, since your avatars are both Lofton yelling
 
#71
#71
1. you are going to talk about comprehension when all i did was ask a question about you having it in for woolridge (which you never actually answered).

2. it just adds a negative vibe to the entire comment. it seriously looks like you only complimented pearl so you could bash woolridge yet again. to be honest, i was taken aback that you actually typed his name rather than calling him swipersuck.

3. get over yourself. for real.

Believe it or not, the point of the post was about Pearl not Woolridge. You could also note that no one else apparently received this "vibe."
 
#73
#73
Believe it or not, the point of the post was about Pearl not Woolridge. You could also note that no one else apparently received this "vibe."

No, he's right. You do consistently go out of your way to directly or indirectly bash Woolridge. I'm not sure why you're attempting to deny or elude that fact.
 
#74
#74
Believe it or not, the point of the post was about Pearl not Woolridge. You could also note that no one else apparently received this "vibe."

maybe they were all just more taken aback from seeing "woolridge" instead of swipersuck and were unable to comment? :good!:
 
#75
#75
I would just like to say that seeing you two argue is making me lol, since your avatars are both Lofton yelling

Yes, I apologize. This is taking away from what was a substantive thread about the game. Somehow, we've moved into examining my posts for subliminal negative statements about Woolridge.
 

VN Store



Back
Top