It's still just he and Nicklaus at the top with Snead, Hogan, Nelson and Jones close behind.
I have seen Nicklaus play in person many times while in his prime . I have seen Snead play in person in 3 tournaments, past his prime , but once was when he finished second at the PGA in Akron, Ohio in 1966. I have seen Hogan play in 2 tournaments (past his prime) but he still finished 20th in The U.S. Open in 1967 at Baltusrol, and couldn't putt a lick. He shot 66 about the same time with a 30 on the back 9 at the Masters.
Those guys, along with the others mentioned, are just better at winning. That is why I would love to see all those guys versus Tiger, all in their primes, with the
balls, clubs, and agronomy from their era , and then from the current era. It's a different game now.
If Tiger swung as hard as he does now, with the balls and persimmon woods from the early days, he would never find his ball. Those guys were all superior mentally. The best pure ball striker that I have seen in person is Boo Weekly. Getting it in the hole, under pressure, is what separates the men from the boys.
Nicklaus never really worked on his short game until he got older, and lost a little distance, and needed to regain his edge. I have no idea who the best ever is, because they all played different games, and were the best in their respective eras. I really think that those guys would have all found a way to win, regardless of the competition..