I don't disagree with anything you said. Tiger brought more people into the game, but most didn't stick with it, because it is much more difficult, and took much more time than they realized.
The number of golfers in the U.S. has settled back into the same numbers as pre-Tiger. In 1995, there were 24.7 million golfers who played, or went to practice facilities at least once per year. 16.6 million are considered "core golfers" because they play at least 8 rounds per year.
After growing to nearly 30 million golfers in the U.S. in 2008, participation has steadily gone down. We are now back to slightly less than 25 million, which is the same as 1995. So, I think that Tiger temporarily brought people into the game. Of course, the First Tee program has grown the game also. My point is that the game is where it was pre-Tiger, as far as participation goes. It doesn't seem like the "buzz" that he generated lasted.
Undoubtedly, people like doozer and volfan turn on the tv to watch their Tiger play, and probably sit it out when he doesn't, but I don't consider people like that as true golf fans. They are idol worshippers.
Read what fellow pro Pat Perez said about Tiger today. It is in line with what I have been saying, and getting blasted for by a couple of people on here. I'm sure it's on pgatour.com of thegolfchannel.com.Good post. 100% agree. The game of golf has always been bigger than generational stars. The core golfers know this. I could care less if Tiger ever plays another round or not and hated the bias in the media for him. As you correctly pointed out it did no long term good for the social justice warriors to ride that horse when he was obviously a highly flawed human being. When his world crashed, the bandwagon fans and Tiger inspired casual golfers declined down to what we see today.
IMO what Tiger did revolutionize were golfers as athletes. He inspired many of his competitors to get in better physical condition, work on their mental approaches, and work on their techniques. To me that was the long term benefit of Tiger. There wasn't near the level of quality competition as there is today. A lot of out of shape guys won. He helped that and you don't see it happening now. But he can no more compete with these young guns than could the 40 somethings compete with him in his prime. His body and mental approach are shot. He is too muscled for that stiff back to turn properly. His posture is off and he cannot remain on plane. Now when his head goes down in preparation for the front leg spring - there is no spring because his back is stiff and straight. He's a hot mess now.
I agree with a lot of that. 40 year olds with injury issues have never fared well on tour and we may never see Tiger get back inside the top 100 much less winning again.Good post. 100% agree. The game of golf has always been bigger than generational stars. The core golfers know this. I could care less if Tiger ever plays another round or not and hated the bias in the media for him. As you correctly pointed out it did no long term good for the social justice warriors to ride that horse when he was obviously a highly flawed human being. When his world crashed, the bandwagon fans and Tiger inspired casual golfers declined down to what we see today.
IMO what Tiger did revolutionize were golfers as athletes. He inspired many of his competitors to get in better physical condition, work on their mental approaches, and work on their techniques. To me that was the long term benefit of Tiger. There wasn't near the level of quality competition as there is today. A lot of out of shape guys won. He helped that and you don't see it happening now. But he can no more compete with these young guns than could the 40 somethings compete with him in his prime. His body and mental approach are shot. He is too muscled for that stiff back to turn properly. His posture is off and he cannot remain on plane. Now when his head goes down in preparation for the front leg spring - there is no spring because his back is stiff and straight. He's a hot mess now.
Tiger's career lasted 15 years, and his main contemporaries , although most a little older, were Phil, Ernie, Vijay, Padraig, Love, Sergio, and Duval, unless I'm forgetting someone. All of those guys put together probably have about as many majors as Tiger. Of course, Tiger averaging 1 a year takes away one fourth of the chances during those years.I agree with a lot of that. 40 year olds with injury issues have never fared well on tour and we may never see Tiger get back inside the top 100 much less winning again.
I disagree though about the level of competition. Tiger had plenty of contemporaries that would fare just fine now.
Read what fellow pro Pat Perez said about Tiger today. It is in line with what I have been saying, and getting blasted for by a couple of people on here. I'm sure it's on pgatour.com of thegolfchannel.com.
Pat Perez el oh el. That guy wouldn't be allowed to clean Tiger's clubs. Has even finished top 10 in a major? Been top 25 on a money list or in world golf rankings? Dude can't make a name for himself on the course, so he uses his mouth of it. Tiger is his prime Sabbatinni'd clowns like this guy.
There was some truth to it, but if you know anything about Pat Perez, it was just another eye roll moment.
Some of it, yeah, but it's hard for me to disagree with some of it. Indicating he pulled out only because he was losing was silly and phrasing it that Woods knows "he can't beat anybody" was too, but the rest IMO is probably pretty spot on.
Some of it, yeah, but it's hard for me to disagree with some of it. Indicating he pulled out only because he was losing was silly and phrasing it that Woods knows "he can't beat anybody" was too, but the rest IMO is probably pretty spot on.
If I was a public figure I'd never say this, but I'm not so I will
What do y'all think the odds Tiger was juicing are? About 95%? The change in his physical appearance over the years and career trajectory/injury history have a lot of the hallmarks of a guy who was juicing. Probably not with anabolic steroids, but with HGH.
It's possible but I never thought Woods got so big that it was obvious. But I'm not an expert on working out and muscle gain.
A guy like Barry Bonds, it was obvious he was juicing because he went from a stick to bursting out of his jersey and his head grew gigantic.
That's what I have always thought. Maybe more like 99%. I went to baseball spring training last year, and couldn't help but notice A-Rod's lack of game and drop in size. Then he quit. I think that Tiger is suffering withdrawal from the juice.If I was a public figure I'd never say this, but I'm not so I will
What do y'all think the odds Tiger was juicing are? About 95%? The change in his physical appearance over the years and career trajectory/injury history have a lot of the hallmarks of a guy who was juicing. Probably not with anabolic steroids, but with HGH.