Vol8188
revolUTion in the air!
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2011
- Messages
- 47,178
- Likes
- 45,206
On line? That's even funnier.
At what age to you think a child should no longer be required to go to school?
5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15?
No age?
VOA Special Report | History of mass shooters | College campus shootingsHow’s that not an easy fix? Off the top of my head I can only name one shooting to ever occur at a university. Why? Because the people who don’t want to be there, aren’t there
VOA Special Report | History of mass shooters | College campus shootings
The first mass shooting in modern U.S. history at a college or university took place in 1966 at the University of Texas at Austin. Fifteen people were killed and 31 others injured.
Since then, eight more mass shootings have occurred on college campuses through 2019 — the majority of them taking place in the past 15 years.
VOA Special Report | History of mass shooters | College campus shootings
The first mass shooting in modern U.S. history at a college or university took place in 1966 at the University of Texas at Austin. Fifteen people were killed and 31 others injured.
Since then, eight more mass shootings have occurred on college campuses through 2019 — the majority of them taking place in the past 15 years.
Over half of the "lower" or troubled students do not even log in. They are in that position because of a lack of parenting, so your answer it to put them at home even longer?What’s funny about online? Your local school system probably wastes a minimum of 250k a year running an alternative school. You can move in online for free.
I’d make paths easier for students to drop out in 9th grade.
Over half of the "lower" or troubled students do not even log in. They are in that position because of a lack of parenting, so your answer it to put them at home even longer?
It would be a vast improvement.
Your better conclusion would be that people over the age of 18 have a little more control and wisdom than 15 year olds.
No, it makes perfect sense. The 15-17 year old male is the most emotionally volatile creature there is. They also typically have zero coping skills.That’s a less likely conclusion given it’s typically older high school students. If your claim was true it would be an epidemic in the middle and elementary schools.
No, it makes perfect sense. The 15-17 year old male is the most emotionally volatile creature there is. They also typically have zero coping skills.
You may need to factor in that a predisposition for shooting up a school may run counter to college ambition.It doesn’t make sense. There is not magical change off that occurs when a 17 year old enters college. If what you’re claiming is true, you’d still see plenty of college school shootings because numerous students enter college at 17.
You also wouldn’t see a complete drop off to nearly 0 at 18 with college students. You don’t become 18 and you’re automatically less volatile and more capable of coping than a 17 year old.
You disagree that a school would be considered a soft target?@Orangeburst Do you think this comment is tasteless?
Are you saying if one had no desire for college they have no desire to be educated?
Interesting. At what age should a child be allowed to drop out of school?
I'm more curious about @Orangeburst's definition of tasteless comments.You disagree that a school would be considered a soft target?
Sorry, to many different things going on at once. I actually agree with letting them drop out at 16, which they can do with parents consent. I would be willing to go with allowing them to drop out at 16 without parental consent.I answered the last question already in a previous reply to you. I’d go with about 9th grade with parents permission, 16 without.
It’s not about a desire for education. I’m saying kids who want to be at school, don’t shoot up the school, thus the low rates of shootings in higher education.
Sorry, to many different things going on at once. I actually agree with letting them drop out at 16, which they can do with parents consent. I would be willing to go with allowing them to drop out at 16 without parental consent.
But it would have no effect on the number of school shootings.
Why would it not? You yourself believe it’s mainly 16-17 year olds doing this. So removing the 16-17 year olds who don’t won’t to be there seems like it should have a positive impact