Vol49er
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2018
- Messages
- 4,568
- Likes
- 10,644
Those examples have no real life instances that suggest 1. This is likely to be a common theme and 2. That this deal is among the nations best….I see this along the lines of the alcohol in stadiums, or NIL collectives being formed…at the time these were unheard of things that many folks disliked the idea of. Not an apples to apples comparison but seems for realistic than your examples, and like I said many were against those ideas, yet now they are common place and making money. $20m isn’t chump change, we will never get a statement saying that x amount of money was allocated to Spyre as a result, but donors are only giving so much, those renderings of an updated TBA inside would have costed money likely from donors, that money can now go to other things.1. If it pushes funds toward Spyre, then I’m fine with it. Asked and answered.
2. If Pilot offered Tennessee $20 million to change the school colors to yellow, red, and black, it would be a good idea? Or change our name from Volunteers to the Fighting Fuel Pumps? Both extreme examples, but also awful, horrible ideas. So, sorry, I disagree…adding $20 million can be a negative.
This instance isn’t the end of the world, but it wasn’t necessary, either. At the end of the day, it isn’t earth-shattering and we aren’t likely to lose fans over it. But it is a talking point and I don’t think it’s crazy to think some fans are just generally upset that it’s another case of anything and everything being for sale.
What’s the risk here? Market value says this is arguably the best collegiate naming rights deal on the market, would seem like that would suggest a great value and risk/reward deal.The value-add and risk/reward was my point. $1 billion and $20 million are miles and miles apart. BTO said adding $20 million is never a negative and I tried to present a couple examples of when it would be a negative because the risk wasn't worth it and there wasn't enough value-add for the price.
The value-add and risk/reward was my point. $1 billion and $20 million are miles and miles apart. BTO said adding $20 million is never a negative and I tried to present a couple examples of when it would be a negative because the risk wasn't worth it and there wasn't enough value-add for the price.
I’m fairly confident in him hiring a good basketball coach, moreso than I was with football. No offense to Barnes but I would hope he would have zero to do with picking his replacement.Danny White is a top 5 AD in the country. He will hire a good basketball coach, just like all of his hires have turned out at minimum fine.!
Thompson and Boling are sponsors and I’d say 75% of Vol fans don’t even know their last name. And it’s not like TBA is a Mecca, like Neyland.!
Danny White is a top 5 AD in the country. He will hire a good basketball coach, just like all of his hires have turned out at minimum fine.!
He has a hiring track record as a very successful AD at much lower levels. The jury is still out as an AD at a major player in college sports. That’s why I said his legacy is going to be defined by the hiring of the next basketball coach. And obviously if Heupel were to leave for the NFL, what would he do there (although the donors are more the decision makers for football hires)?
It is not. He’s a top ten AD. Everybody who follows athletics departments acknowledges this. His resume as an AD stacks up with anyone in the country. And I’d say that even if Heupel went 8-4 last year.
(Also, if you don’t know if he can hire a basketball coach, guess who gave Nate Oats his first big break)
Danny is a top 10 AD because of Heupel, Barnes, and Vitello. He didn’t hire two of those and he’s only been here 2 and a half years. I’m not ready to worship him yet. But I’m certainly wouldn’t show him the door.
No. Danny was a top 10 AD before he got here. His work with Central Florida was unparalleled and he won an AD of the year while at UCF. And he’s the main reason UCF somehow got a Big 12 invite.
You're missing the point in its most simplistic form. You made a blanket statement that cashing a $20 million check is never a negative. I disagree and presented my two examples, albeit extremes, where it would be a negative. No need to overthink it.Those examples have no real life instances that suggest 1. This is likely to be a common theme and 2. That this deal is among the nations best….I see this along the lines of the alcohol in stadiums, or NIL collectives being formed…at the time these were unheard of things that many folks disliked the idea of. Not an apples to apples comparison but seems for realistic than your examples, and like I said many were against those ideas, yet now they are common place and making money. $20m isn’t chump change, we will never get a statement saying that x amount of money was allocated to Spyre as a result, but donors are only giving so much, those renderings of an updated TBA inside would have costed money likely from donors, that money can now go to other things.
JMO
That's a fair point. And like another poster said, I'd have less of an issue with it if this were naming rights to a new arena. But you know it's coming for Neyland sooner or later, too.If we start talking about Neyland and renaming, I believe we have a legitimate case since not only is Neyland the most important person in the history of the athletic department but also a war hero. Thompson and Boling are sponsors and I’d say 75% of Vol fans don’t even know their first names. And it’s not like TBA is a Mecca, like Neyland.
Didn't he already keep Vitello on campus? And he hired Heupel and has extended him, as well.Maybe I’ll also be a Danny-sexual if he keeps Heupel and Vitello on campus and he makes the next basketball hire that keeps UT in the top 15. I’m giving it a few more years before agreeing that he’s Sports Jesus since he’s only been at the big boy conference level for a minute or two (with Daddy on speed dial). Bill Battle’s **** didn’t stink in 1970.