bleedorange0037
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2007
- Messages
- 15,045
- Likes
- 1,646
I'm not interested in the Dooley discussion but that UK loss had nothing to do with their WR turned QB. Yeah UT sucked that day but every time I read "lost to a team with no QB" I wonder if that person really watched the game
How much blame for that loss lies at the feet of our defense's performance against their "QB" is certainly debatable, but its neither here nor there to me. An oddity like losing to a team without a QB is something that would only happen to Dooley, and sums up his tenure perfectly IMO. The guy just wasn't a winner.