jwilliams
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2015
- Messages
- 2,743
- Likes
- 5,539
If you were talking about a small school in a weak conference then your analysis would be correct. But thats not the case. This is TN. A big time school in a big time conference. Its completely valid to say the administration at TN doesnt want to win. And there is proof.
2008 the move is made to run Fulmer out of town. You can agree or disagree that it was time, but thats not the point. Now understand at that time we were still very relevant on the national scene. We won the East the previous year. So the search for a HC began. Now we know that Gary Patterson was ready to take the job at TN. A proven winner and a good hC. Yet what happened? Lane Kiffin. A guy who had never coached in college football before and bombed in the NFL was hired. Now if the administration really cared about winning, they would have done what was necessary to hire Patterson.
Next up was ol Doofus. After Kiffin bolts in the middle of the night like a scared kid, the administration freaked out and hired a proven loser. Now, Kiffin went 7-6. While not good, not really terrible either. Our teams were competitive. So it stands to reason that we were still relatively relevant going into 2010. Yet instead of doing what an administration concerned with winning would do, TN did the opposite. Then we start spiraling down.
Now to Botch Jones. At this point, the administration couldnt really be blamed for hiring Botch. After all, he was a winner at Central Michigan and Cincy. And to be fair, we had fallen way out of relevancy. But still, its hard to imagine that with our reputation and resources that we couldnt have gotten someone better. Botch was hired on the cheap just like Pruitt. And we see the results. The bottom line is if the TN adminstration truly wanted to have a winning football program, we would. Its that simple. Talk about money? TN still makes a bunch of money. But what we do make would pale in comparison to what we would make if the football program was balling at an elite level.
So no the TN administration does not want to win. The coaching hires since Fulmer reiterate and reinforce that statement.
This is a decent synopsis, but you’re missing a couple things. The program began its decline in 2002. Dickey was gone and Schumaker became president. There are interviews of boosters reporting that at this time Fulmer began telling them that he was unable to “get his guys in.” Apparently, the new administration had an academic bent and didn’t think some of the football practices were necessary.
This trend continued for quite a while... through butch jones. It wasn’t until chancellor Davenport and dipietro were fired that things really changed. Randy Boyd is a really good business man. Phillip Fulmer is a VFL who knows what it takes to succeed. The administration issues have been corrected. Now we have to fix the football team. That’s why this time around is different from Kiffin, or Dooley, or Jones.
This administration wants to win. You won’t convince me otherwise. Perhaps bringing a **** storm of a program from the brink of irrelevancy to the top tier of the SEC is difficult. Who knew?