If he loses to teams with less talent then he has undercoached the roster. Vandy, Mizzou, and UK have less talent... and it isn't all that close.
I full well expect him to win those games IF he's the right coach to bring UT back... plus pull off an upset vs UGA, USCe, or Auburn by outcoaching them.
I have said it numerous times. UT will NEVER rise to the level of championship play with a coach who only beats the teams with less talent. I'm not sure any program can but UT for sure cannot because of the lack of instate talent. There is a two edged sword. UT's coach has to outcoach others because he may have a disadvantage in talent AND he will only pull elite out of state recruits in consistently sufficient numbers if he demonstrates he's an elite coach... who can beat teams who have more talent.
I do not have to believe Jones is the "guy" at this point to support him. In fact, I would say that it is pretty foolish to ignore his possible deficiencies and shortcomings. I'm just not ready to declare him a sure bet if he does no better than Dooley did in his first season.
I think me and you agree on most I just do not think it is fair to say Jones has undercoached or overcoached the team at this point. He has won the games he should and lost the games he was supposed to. While I have some issue with some of the decisions that have been made I am not going to judge him on this season. I believe that there is a HUGE learning curve for a coach with no SEC experience to come into this league and coach. I think there will have to be some tweaks to his offensive system as the season progresses for us to be successful but on the flip side I also think that is why the defense is ahead of the offense at this point because most of the coaches on the defensive side of the ball have SEC experience.