To the flagpole this morning

Will you finally admit he is a bad choisce when he begins the rollout of his far left agenda?

When we look at his body of work and if I don't like what he has done, then yes I will. Until then we have no way to judge his presidency since he hasn't assumed office yet.

So easy to say that when your candidate is the next president isn't it? Like you wouldn't have been on here whining if the tables were turned.

I would have said the exact same thing. If J-Mac would have won, I would have given him a chance to end the war in Iraq, secure our borders, fix the economy, and not overturn Roe v Wade, then I would have said he did a great job.

I have maybe all of 6 posts on the politics fourm, and in 0 of them have I whined about anything. (Please don't say there's nothing to whine about either, look at the state this country is in.) So until you actually want to act like a grown up and not take your ball and go home like a 3rd grader, don't reply.
 
You can try to put me out if you would like.

Unpatriotic is defending a terrorist sympathizer whose wife was only proud to be an American after her husband was running for president.

UnAmerican is taking from those who work hard to succeed and giving it to those who won't work.

Doesn't seem too hard to understand does it?
 
You can try to put me out if you would like.

Unpatriotic is defending a terrorist sympathizer whose wife was only proud to be an American after her husband was running for president.

UnAmerican is taking from those who work hard to succeed and giving it to those who won't work.
enough with this crap
 
Perfect then you can see what happens and where your money goes for the next 4 years and I hope your happy with it.

I prolly should not has said what I said. Fair enough?

Well since I don't make over $250,000 I'll enjoy where my money goes.

Fair enough.
 
except I have a very good job and as long as there are criminals in this city, I'll retain my job. But since you are all knowing, why don't you just go ahead and write me a nice big fat check to cash.

My God, man. You're in Smyrna. What was the major crime this week? Someone stole gumballs down at Mr. Druckers?
 
I'll gladly buy into it until proven otherwise.

Did you buy in to the Weapons of Mass Destruction hogwash?

These Kurds did.

kurd.jpg


BTW, we hung the guy that did this horrific deed. You may have caught it on the news.
 
These Kurds did.

kurd.jpg


BTW, we hung the guy that did this horrific deed. You may have caught it on the news.

Here's some food for thought.

Let's worry about our own country before we try to be a savior to another.

Who decided it was our right to go into other countries to fight a war?

We should be focusing on our own issues not Iraq's.
 
here's some food for thought.

Let's worry about our own country before we try to be a savior to another.

Who decided it was our right to go into other countries to fight a war?

We should be focusing on our own issues not iraq's.
look logic
 
Here's some food for thought.

Let's worry about our own country before we try to be a savior to another.

Who decided it was our right to go into other countries to fight a war?

We should be focusing on our own issues not Iraq's.

Says the Obama supporter who likes the idea of taking fromo one to give to another.
 
I am not mad he is unhappy I dont care to see our flag upside down I dont give a damn the reason.
but don't you and LG and the like support the right to burn the flag? Why gripe about one upside down when burning it doesn't seem to be a bother?
 
Here's some food for thought.

Let's worry about our own country before we try to be a savior to another.

Who decided it was our right to go into other countries to fight a war?

We should be focusing on our own issues not Iraq's.
We weren't discussing the moral issue of the invasion.

Your question was about WMD. The Kurds are living (dead) proof that chemical and/or biological weapons existed.
 
but don't you and LG and the like support the right to burn the flag? Why gripe about one upside down when burning it doesn't seem to be a bother?
Anyone who burns the flag is a piece of.......... but they have the right. I would hate that person and speak out about how wrong it is.
 
but don't you and LG and the like support the right to burn the flag? Why gripe about one upside down when burning it doesn't seem to be a bother?

I resent the fact he decided to make that his signature just because he does not like the choice WE made as president of the US, I did not like (hated) Bush but I didn't act like a jack@ss because of it.
 
I resent the fact he decided to make that his signature just because he does not like the choice WE made as president of the US, I did not like (hated) Bush but I didn't act like a jack@ss because of it.
you want a moonpie for not being a jackass?

you're a freaking squid for goodness' sake.

BTW, I agree on the sig, but didn't realize it was there, as I don't see any of them, by design. I also think the thing was over the top, but those debating hardest are exactly the folks who would be OK with flag burning.
 
you want a moonpie for not being a jackass?

you're a freaking squid for goodness' sake.

BTW, I agree on the sig, but didn't realize it was there, as I don't see any of them, by design. I also think the thing was over the top, but those debating hardest are exactly the folks who would be OK with flag burning.

Ok, and yes I like moonpies!
 
you want a moonpie for not being a jackass?

you're a freaking squid for goodness' sake.

BTW, I agree on the sig, but didn't realize it was there, as I don't see any of them, by design. I also think the thing was over the top, but those debating hardest are exactly the folks who would be OK with flag burning.
Do you think it should be illegal?
 
We weren't discussing the moral issue of the invasion.

Your question was about WMD. The Kurds are living (dead) proof that chemical and/or biological weapons existed.

Yes those weapons did exist

From wiki..

wikipedia said:
This article concerns the Iraqi government's use, possession, and alleged intention of acquiring more types of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) during the presidency of Saddam Hussein. During his reign of several decades, he was internationally known for his use of chemical weapons in the 1980s against civilians and in the Iran–Iraq War. Following the 1991 Gulf War he also engaged in a decade-long confrontation with the United Nations and its weapons inspectors, which ended in the 2003 invasion by the United States.

The United Nations located and destroyed large quantities of Iraqi WMD throughout the early 1990s, with varying degrees of Iraqi cooperation and obstruction.[1] Washington withdrew weapons inspectors in 1998, resulting in Operation Desert Fox. The United States and the UK asserted that Saddam Hussein still possessed large hidden stockpiles of WMD in 2003, and that he was clandestinely procuring and producing more. Inspections by the U.N. restarted from November 2002 until March 2003,[2] but hadn't turned up any evidence of actual WMDs when the United States and the "Coalition of the Willing" invaded Iraq and overthrew Saddam Hussein in March 2003.

Great controversy emerged when no stockpiles of WMDs were found, leading to accusations that the United States, its President George W. Bush in particular, had deliberately inflated intelligence or lied about Iraq's weapons in order to justify an invasion of the country. The non-profit and non-partisan Center for Public Integrity asserted President Bush's administration made a total of 935 false statements between 2001 and 2003 about Iraq's alleged threat to the United States.[3]While various inert, leftover WMDs and weapons components from the 1980s and 1990s have been found, most weapons inspectors now believe that Iraq's chemical weapons program ceased production after 1991.
 

VN Store



Back
Top