ABINGDON VOL FAN
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2017
- Messages
- 14,838
- Likes
- 13,958
Switch Brady and Peyton, Rivers, Rodgers and you have the reverse SB wins with all of them. I doubt Brady makes it to the Sb on the Colts teams Peyton played on.
Have anything to back this up? Enough with the Manning garbage. He had the number ranked defense in the league in 2007 and flamed out in his first playoff game against San Diego. He had the number two ranked defense in 2005 and flamed out in his first playoff game against Pittsburgh. He had a top ten defense five times in Indy and lost his first playoff game four times. So no there’s nothing to suggest that if you switch Brady and Manning that the Pats would have won all of those Super Bowls.Switch Brady and Peyton, Rivers, Rodgers and you have the reverse SB wins with all of them. I doubt Brady makes it to the Sb on the Colts teams Peyton played on.
Tom Brady playing with a hall of fame running back, a hall of fame receiver, another soon to be hall of fame receiver, an all pro tight end, and great offensive line and a hall of fame coach. Nope no way he would have been able to win a super bowl with those squads.You’re right I’m sure Brady couldn’t do that, not like he took a team that hasn’t made the playoffs in 11 years in a COVID year, threw 40 TD’s in his age 43 season, and led them to a Super Bowl in his first year. I’m sure the 2000’’s Colts were tougher situations.
Have anything to back this up? Enough with the Manning garbage. He had the number ranked defense in the league in 2007 and flamed out in his first playoff game against San Diego. He had the number two ranked defense in 2005 and flamed out in his first playoff game against Pittsburgh. He had a top ten defense five times in Indy and lost his first playoff game four times. So no there’s nothing to suggest that if you switch Brady and Manning that the Pats would have won all of those Super Bowls.
Brady chose wisely where he was going. The Tampa Bay team was strong with or without Brady. Fournette and Brown were strong additions and Tampa’s D was strong with excellent coaching. Brady always had the strong defense on his side unlike Peyton’s teams with the exception of his last year.You’re right I’m sure Brady couldn’t do that, not like he took a team that hasn’t made the playoffs in 11 years in a COVID year, threw 40 TD’s in his age 43 season, and led them to a Super Bowl in his first year. I’m sure the 2000’’s Colts were tougher situations.
As I noted above, Peyton had plenty of strong defenses and still couldn’t win Super Bowls with them.Brady chose wisely where he was going. The Tampa Bay team was strong with or without Brady. Fournette and Brown were strong additions and Tampa’s D was strong with excellent coaching. Brady always had the strong defense on his side unlike Peyton’s teams with the exception of his last year.
The colts teams D’s was finesse. That didn’t get you anywhere in the postseason. The Patriots always were the more physical team and much better coached because of Belichek.Have anything to back this up? Enough with the Manning garbage. He had the number ranked defense in the league in 2007 and flamed out in his first playoff game against San Diego. He had the number two ranked defense in 2005 and flamed out in his first playoff game against Pittsburgh. He had a top ten defense five times in Indy and lost his first playoff game four times. So no there’s nothing to suggest that if you switch Brady and Manning that the Pats would have won all of those Super Bowls.
With Sanders it was the one year. The other years , No. The defense definitely was responsible for the loss to the Saints. They played off the receivers the whole game and could not generate any pass rush on Brees.Ok? So their defense was good enough to win a super bowl. Thanks for confirming what I posted.
Manning threw a pick six late in the 4th qtr. Whether YOU like it or not, Brady has a clutch gene that Manning doesn'tWith Sanders it was the one year. The other years , No. The defense definitely was responsible for the loss to the Saints. They played off the receivers the whole game and could not generate any pass rush on Brees.
My opinion is backed up by facts, which I’ve posted. You’ve literally provided nothing to back up any of your claims. I’ve been able to shoot down every bit of nonsense that you’ve posted. Again there’s nothing to suggest that Manning would have won the Super Bowls that Brady did in NE. In Indianapolis, Manning was surrounded by hall of fame talent, a hall of fame coach, highly rated defenses, and still “only” won one super bowl. Bill Belichick’s career record without Tom Brady as his starting quarterback is 63-73. Now if you have anything to dispute those facts, let’s hear them.I have given you enough. You are not going to agree with me regardless because it doesn’t fit your opinion.
Manning didn't play well in either of his Super Bowl wins
I didn't say he played bad.Huh? The box score isn't impressive against the Bears but that was an all-time great D and the Colts put up 29 points in the rain. Literally the only bad weather SB of my life. He had an interception on 3rd and long that was essentially a punt, and that was the only blemish on his performance. He extended a play with his feet to set up a TD bomb to Wayne. He quarterbacked the hell out of that game.