Transgender Female Setting Records

What makes me upset is that there aren't trans women trying to participate in men's sports. Come on girls dudes you can sling your 240 pound weight with the best of the linebackers in the SEC!!

Maybe they’ll start giving out scholarships for a squib kicker.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
If a trans female swimmer (born male) makes the women’s team and earns a women’s scholarship - how does the Law view that with regards to Title IX?

Anyone know?

@ClearwaterVol @RockyTop85
Also, what's the certification process to officially be trans? Do you just declare? What percentage of time would I be required to wear a skirt, if any? Because if I can declare, stay married to a woman, continue to wear the same clothes, and get cash and protection, I might be up for that gig.... I'm missing the down side, unless as a woman I have to sue to get the 20% less that I'd make.
 
I love how, when I was growing up, the the plot to the movie Juwanna Mann was supposed to be so ridiculous as to elicit laughter from viewers. For most of us, the plot was so nonsensical it really wasn't comical. Nowadays, it is reality.

You know we are in trouble when comedies from decades ago (Juwanna Mann, Idiocracy, etc.) are prophetic.
 
Also, what's the certification process to officially be trans? Do you just declare? What percentage of time would I be required to wear a skirt, if any? Because if I can declare, stay married to a woman, continue to wear the same clothes, and get cash and protection, I might be up for that gig.... I'm missing the down side, unless as a woman I have to sue to get the 20% less that I'd make.
One of the hurdles in place (that I do not agree with) is a testosterone threshold. Be hard to fake that, I assume.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wireless1
I don't agree with the concept that one can change one's sex by taking pills. How'd we ever get to that point?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol8188
I don't agree with the concept that one can change one's sex by taking pills. How'd we ever get to that point?

the reductionist philosophy that proclaims suppressing testosterone makes you physically equal to a woman is an insane level I never thought roughly half the population would ever get to
 
Based on all the "Low T" commercials there might be enough "people" already qualified.

I’m 100% going on test in the next few years as I push close to 35 and think every man should. Any negative of aging that we can reverse, we should
 
Also, what's the certification process to officially be trans? Do you just declare? What percentage of time would I be required to wear a skirt, if any? Because if I can declare, stay married to a woman, continue to wear the same clothes, and get cash and protection, I might be up for that gig.... I'm missing the down side, unless as a woman I have to sue to get the 20% less that I'd make.

I think just like bankruptcy, all you have to do is declare it out loud.

14bn.gif
 
I don't agree with the concept that one can change one's sex by taking pills. How'd we ever get to that point?

Are they changing their sex, or their gender? I think there's a distinction in there about the physical attributes versus the psychological attributes. In other words, I believe the argument being made is that a person with dude parts(sex) (for example) can identify as a male, female or a nothing (gender.) Note: I'm not agreeing, this is just my understanding of their argument (and I could be wrong.)

None of that sh*t bothers me. If someone wants to identify as a Ford Ranger, that's none of my business but when they use it for an advantage in competition - everyone ought to be screaming from the cheap seats.
 
Are they changing their sex, or their gender? I think there's a distinction in there about the physical attributes versus the psychological attributes. In other words, I believe the argument being made is that a person with dude parts(sex) (for example) can identify as a male, female or a nothing (gender.) Note: I'm not agreeing, this is just my understanding of their argument (and I could be wrong.)

None of that sh*t bothers me. If someone wants to identify as a Ford Ranger, that's none of my business but when they use it for an advantage in competition - everyone ought to be screaming from the cheap seats.

When saying this you seem to be using the modern idea of gender as a societal construct and sex as your physical characteristics.

In terms of sports it’s treated as if they’ve changed their sex also. The advocates will pretend as if announcing you’re a woman and taking hormone therapy changes your sex not your gender.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Sea Ray and Septic
When saying this you seem to be using the modern idea of gender as a societal construct and sex as your physical characteristics.

In terms of sports it’s treated as if they’ve changed their sex also. The advocates will pretend as if announcing you’re a woman and taking hormone therapy changes your sex not your gender.
I just don’t think testosterone levels should be the deciding factor - for anyone.

If Lia Thomas had been born biologically female, and she just naturally had crazy high levels of testosterone - would we bar her from competing against other biological females?
 
I just don’t think testosterone levels should be the deciding factor - for anyone.

If Lia Thomas had been born biologically female, and she just naturally had crazy high levels of testosterone - would we bar her from competing against other biological females?

I agree completely. It's just the only thing they have to fall on. They have to pretend that lowering your testosterone makes you = to a woman, because otherwise they have no argument at all to make. So they have to ignore every other physical advantage men have and just pretend that testosterone fixes all of it.
 
Are they changing their sex, or their gender? I think there's a distinction in there about the physical attributes versus the psychological attributes. In other words, I believe the argument being made is that a person with dude parts(sex) (for example) can identify as a male, female or a nothing (gender.) Note: I'm not agreeing, this is just my understanding of their argument (and I could be wrong.)

None of that sh*t bothers me. If someone wants to identify as a Ford Ranger, that's none of my business but when they use it for an advantage in competition - everyone ought to be screaming from the cheap seats.
You bring up a good point and frankly I think it's the trans folks who don't understand the difference between sex and gender. Case in point the question on various forms/paperwork where they ask about your sex. If they really understood there'd be only 2 choices. Sports should also be based on sex and not gender. I don't care what gender you identify as but don't tell me that your sex changed. It didn't. You are still the sex you were born with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Septic
I agree completely. It's just the only thing they have to fall on. They have to pretend that lowering your testosterone makes you = to a woman, because otherwise they have no argument at all to make. So they have to ignore every other physical advantage men have and just pretend that testosterone fixes all of it.
Swings the other way too. I don’t think the African runner should have to suppress her naturally occurring testosterone levels.
 
Swings the other way too. I don’t think the African runner should have to suppress her naturally occurring testosterone levels.

If it's actually natural, I agree. Idk enough about the case to say if it is or isn't. But I think it would be easy to get caught on steroids and proclaim that's your natural levels. But I also don't know enough about the testing.
 
If it's actually natural, I agree. Idk enough about the case to say if it is or isn't. But I think it would be easy to get caught on steroids and proclaim that's your natural levels. But I also don't know enough about the testing.
She is intersex, female from birth. She has internal testes that generate higher levels of testosterone than other female runners.

She is big, strong, and fast. Just who she is, but they want her to suppress it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol8188
I just don’t agree that an arbitrary testosterone threshold is fair to anyone.

How do you regulate for real men? You don’t. Not a man’s natural testosterone production. Of course there’s steroid testing which automatically disqualifies a real man yet is what is promoted for the mentally ill chics.
 
I’m 100% going on test in the next few years as I push close to 35 and think every man should. Any negative of aging that we can reverse, we should
When you start taking testosterone, your body stops (or at least slows) producing it. It is a vicious cycle.

Oh and "push close to 35"...

iu


STFU


..... and all medicines are poisons.
 
When you start taking testosterone, your body stops (or at least slows) producing it. It is a vicious cycle.

Oh and "push close to 35"...

iu


STFU


..... and all medicines are poisons.

Hormones aren’t medicine and as you get older you stop producing test anyway. I don’t see the problem.
 
Hormones aren’t medicine and as you get older you stop producing test anyway. I don’t see the problem.
You are "pushing 35"... of course you don't. And yeah.... it is medicine. You are being talked into it by slick Madison Avenue advertising.
 
You are "pushing 35"... of course you don't. And yeah.... it is medicine. You are being talked into it by slick Madison Avenue advertising.

I’m not seeing the problem. If your body stops producing something it needs, why wouldn’t you want to replace it?
 
I’m not seeing the problem. If your body stops producing something it needs, why wouldn’t you want to replace it?
Just be sure you talk to your doctor and don't take any of that **** you can buy on TV or online or GNC. All that stuff is garbage.

And if your body stops producing it, it probably doesn't 'need' it unless there is some form of disease involved in that reduction.
 

VN Store



Back
Top