luthervol
rational (x) and reasonable (y)
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2016
- Messages
- 46,622
- Likes
- 19,729
Can you name a modern system of government that ISNT basically a rebranded tweak of something tried by an ancient civilization? There are only so many ways to govern a civilization and they have all been tried and found wanting. The Republic still has the best track record though. And yes, Rome eventually rotted but it gave the Western world an amazingly long period of reasonably stable government. There is a good reason the Founders looked to Rome as they contemplated the Constitution for our then infant nation.And Rome rotted from within with corruption, just as we're doing now. It's hardly a model to follow. Probably not a good idea to model a modern government off of an ancient civilization.
Not at all. As it is now, candidates ignore every state that's not purple. Repubus. completely ignore states they cannot win and dems do the same. If every vote counted, that wouldn't be the case. A repub would much rather lose CA 10 million to 8 million than 11 million to 7 million. As it is now, they couldn't care. Dems would rather lose OK 3 million to 2.5 million than 4 million to 2 million. As it is now, it doesn't matter how bad they lose.In fact tho wouldn't candidates just have to focus on say California, New York, and very few other cities. Not even other states.
We have a representative democracy. Would you prefer a unitary republic? Standard laws everywhere? Maybe state governors appointed by the President or Politburo?I like democracy. America should get one.
The American people did not elect Trump. The electoral college elected Trump. The American people elected Clinton.
You can love the electoral system but what comes with that is the loss of the ability to say "the American people".
The establishment not only had the right to do what they did, they had the obligation and the duty.
No. That's what Trump attempted in 2020. That is treasonus.
A legitimate impeachment of Trump was obligation and duty.
Someone mentioned something about trying to overturn Trump's election. I assumed that included the impeachments.Wait! What? Your original statement had nothing to do with impeachment. It was strictly about popular vote vs. the Electoral College in 2016. And now you're bringing up impeachment proceedings?
You jump jacks worse than a bad 8-track tape player. It is, to be frank, what I find so dishonest about your arguments.