Trump Assassination Attempt(s)

#8,451
#8,451



You don’t hate the media enough! They know this guy is a far left democrat lunatic. They just don’t want to report the truth.


These are the same people that reported a “Runaway SUV” killed all those people in Wisconsin. They didn’t like that a black man committed the crime so they framed it as if the SUV was at fault.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne, marcusluvsvols, TN-POSSUM and 7 others
#8,453
#8,453
lawgator1 said:
I am biased against Trump because I think he's an awful person and a menace to stability and progress in the country. What he did on 1/6, alone, is disqualifying.

I've never said otherwise.

As to the shooter's motives, it's going to be hard to distinguish between general anti-Trump rhetoric and Trump's own statements against the effort to help Ukraine.
Click to expand...
There can only be one @luthervol .
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, Sandman 423, 85SugarVol and 4 others
#8,468
#8,468
VOLS INC. said:



@lawgator1

Thoughts?


It’s almost as if this guy COMPLETELY disagrees with every post you spewed yesterday and this morning.
Click to expand...



Incorrect. I said I wanted to see the evidence on it before forming a judgment.

At this point, there is certainly evidence that he was politically motivated and that he was repeating a lot of the anti-Trump rhetoric out there.

There is also evidence he was keenly interested in the plight of Ukraine and worried about Trump abandoning them. Now, that is part and parcel of the anti-Trump movement, but its not based solely in rhetoric from the anti-Trump camp since Trump, himself, has made more than a few comments saying he is not going to continue the status quo on funding or arms for Ukraine. So, its not as easily traceable, if you will, to simply the anti-Trump contingent.

What role, if any, do you ascribe to Republicans who have used similar rhetoric against Trump?
 
#8,469
#8,469
lawgator1 said:
Incorrect. I said I wanted to see the evidence on it before forming a judgment.

At this point, there is certainly evidence that he was politically motivated and that he was repeating a lot of the anti-Trump rhetoric out there.

There is also evidence he was keenly interested in the plight of Ukraine and worried about Trump abandoning them. Now, that is part and parcel of the anti-Trump movement, but its not based solely in rhetoric from the anti-Trump camp since Trump, himself, has made more than a few comments saying he is not going to continue the status quo on funding or arms for Ukraine. So, its not as easily traceable, if you will, to simply the anti-Trump contingent.

What role, if any, do you ascribe to Republicans who have used similar rhetoric against Trump?
Click to expand...
facepalm-dismay.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83, dillyo51, MemphisVol77 and 1 other person
#8,471
#8,471
lawgator1 said:
Incorrect. I said I wanted to see the evidence on it before forming a judgment.

At this point, there is certainly evidence that he was politically motivated and that he was repeating a lot of the anti-Trump rhetoric out there.

There is also evidence he was keenly interested in the plight of Ukraine and worried about Trump abandoning them. Now, that is part and parcel of the anti-Trump movement, but its not based solely in rhetoric from the anti-Trump camp since Trump, himself, has made more than a few comments saying he is not going to continue the status quo on funding or arms for Ukraine. So, its not as easily traceable, if you will, to simply the anti-Trump contingent.

What role, if any, do you ascribe to Republicans who have used similar rhetoric against Trump?
Click to expand...
What evidence do you have that Trump and Putin are good buddies and that Trump is compromised??? None!!! But you have no problem speculating on that issue.

What evidence do you have the pee tapes exist? None but you had no issue running with that story.

What evidence do you have that Melania hates her husband? None.

Every few weeks you start some insanely idiotic F the GOP and F Trump thread that’s based on pure speculation.

You only want to slow down, pause, and “wait for the facts” when it serves your political agenda.

Everyone sees that but you. There is plenty of evidence for that fact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volinsd, hUTch2002, Cod and 4 others
#8,474
#8,474
Vol8188 said:
Find me the quote then. Back up your claim. Where did he say that?
Click to expand...
He’s talking about the Vance interview with Dana Bash. He’s completely taking what Vance said out of context though. Don’t feel bad Dana did the same thing while Vance wiped the floor with her. Basically Vance was saying they had to write the stories for the media for them to actually report on situations like Springfield Ohio.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77 and Vol8188
#8,475
#8,475
VOLS INC. said:
What evidence do you have that Trump and Putin are good buddies and that Trump is compromised??? None!!! But you have no problem speculating on that issue.

What evidence do you have the pee tapes exist? None but you had no issue running with that story.

What evidence do you have that Melania hates her husband? None.

Every few weeks you start some insanely idiotic F the GOP and F Trump thread that’s based on pure speculation.

You only want to slow down, pause, and “wait for the facts” when it serves your political agenda.

Everyone sees that but you. There is plenty of evidence for that fact.
Click to expand...

Heck, I'm still trying to figure out why they told me my whole life I should hate Russia and now a good portion of my life I should hate Putin. Russia government didn't plan to overthrow a President Elect and President.... Obama, Biden, Hillary, Congress, DOJ, FBI, CIA, media, DNC, RNC, etc did.

Empires collapse from within.... a Republic "if you can keep it".

Russia, Russia, Russia in 2024 is so loony only a LG could promote it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83, whodeycin85 and InVOLuntary
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top