Trump Assassination Attempt(s)

Dan Bongino goes on an amazing rant. Says “Trump is not being giving the protection required because they simply don’t want to” & that “They better hope their proxy’s win the election...All this could have been avoided with a drone."

 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
Dan Bongino goes on an amazing rant. Says “Trump is not being giving the protection required because they simply don’t want to” & that “They better hope their proxy’s win the election...All this could have been avoided with a drone."




The Biden administration asked the Congress to increase protection for Trump weeks before this latest episode.

Quit dividing people over an issue 98 % of the country agrees on.
 
The Biden administration asked the Congress to increase protection for Trump weeks before this latest episode.

Quit dividing people over an issue 98 % of the country agrees on.

Of course, you kept repeating the lies after 7/13 that the Biden admin/HS/SS didnt deny resource requests from Trump campaign.

You even tripled down on it even after they admitted they lied about it...
 
The Biden administration asked the Congress to increase protection for Trump weeks before this latest episode.

Quit dividing people over an issue 98 % of the country agrees on.
It's called "providing information without an agenda and without the need to move opinion in any direction".

fyi
 
Lurk much? You have serious issues. Wrestling with demons? Sleep well at night? It will soon be over in about 50 days. The mask thing will always happen when there is a Pandemic or epidemic and people will have a choice to wear or not to wear a masks or follow a set a rules in anything you do.
Afraid you are not going to get your way, then run away or change it or conform or protest or throw a temper tantrum.
Remember there is somebody that will disagree with you and belittle you on the other side or threaten you because of your beliefs.
Do we get to riot, loot and burn things down? Sounds like fun.
 
Last edited:
Now he's offering a 150K bounty? Why would they hide a trans kid mentally ill manifesto, because it might incite violence, but will release this?



Why Did The Biden DoJ Release Trump Assassin's $150,000 Reward To "Complete The Job" Letter To The Public? | ZeroHedge

During his first court appearance last week, Routh declared that he had no assets and only owned two trucks worth $1,000. In a 2023 book that apparently written by him, Routh also wrote that he had no bank account and no retirement savings.

Now, like the first attempt, things are not adding up now. He is traveling and doing stuff from Hawaii, NC, and the Ukraine but has no assets. ????
 
And the difference between not releasing an insane trans manifesto but releasing this guy's letter that's insane?


I'm not following you. What I do know is that they have released his letter so they can up the charges past simple firearms possession offenses.

Are you claiming the Nashville shooter wasn't insane?

Nashville shooter?
 
I'm not following you. What I do know is that they have released his letter so they can up the charges past simple firearms possession offenses.



Nashville shooter?
Yes. He as asking why this would be Trump assassin’s manifesto was released while the Nashville school shooters manifesto was not. And you replied bc the Trump would be assassin was insane.
 
Yes. He as asking why this would be Trump assassin’s manifesto was released while the Nashville school shooters manifesto was not. And you replied bc the Trump would be assassin was insane.

Oh, I see.

Well, let's just say that it seems to me the two situations are pretty different but if you want to believe that there is some massive conspiracy to protect the ramblings of the Nashville shooter because he was transgender, have at it.
 
I'm not following you. What I do know is that they have released his letter so they can up the charges past simple firearms possession offenses.



Nashville shooter?
Wait, you "know" they released the letter to be able to up the charges?

Are you saying that they would not have been able to up the charges without releasing the letter?

If that is what you are saying, I believe your understanding of the law here is flawed. Please feel free to correct me on FL law if I am incorrect.

I believe they have the capacity to up the charges without actually providing a free advertisement for a "wanted dead or alive" bounty on a another human being's life. In fact, releasing evidence against the defendant could be prejudicial to his right to a fair trial, and, if this was sanctioned by a prosecutor, it should subject that prosecutor to potential ethical complaints.

This release leads reasonable people to suspect that perhaps the authorities had other reasons for wanting the bounty published broadly.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77
Wait, you "know" they released the letter to be able to up the charges?

Are you saying that they would not have been able to up the charges without releasing the letter?

If that is what you are saying, I believe your understanding of the law here is flawed. Please feel free to correct me on FL law if I am incorrect.

I believe they have the capacity to up the charges without actually providing a free advertisement for a "wanted dead or alive" bounty on a another human being's life. In fact, releasing evidence against the defendant could be prejudicial to his right to a fair trial, and, if this was sanctioned by a prosecutor, it should subject that prosecutor to potential ethical complaints.

This release leads reasonable people to suspect that perhaps the authorities had other reasons for wanting the bounty published broadly.

They cited to it in legal memorandum to keep him in custody and defeat any concern he was being held on charges which, by themselves, might lead to release.

Its hard to imagine that anyone thinks that Routh is going to pay them $150,000 is they succeed in assassinating Trump. As in, impossible to believe.
 
Do we get to riot, loot and burn things down? Sounds like fun.
Nice comeback, meaningless. You don't get it.
Ask one of the Jan 6 tourist? Antifa will also give a response, as well?
Swim at your own risk? It makes no difference who is doing the riot, looting or burning, they will never get a green light.
Try again and grow up in the process.
Some of you like using a video game or TV - Game of Thrones mentality for solving problems.
Draw a line or put up a barrier and post a sign that states "Any Unauthorized Person that proceeds beyond this Point will be shot".
 
Last edited:
Nice comeback, meaningless. You don't get it.
Ask one of the Jan 6 tourist? Antifa will also give a response, as well?
Swim at your own risk? It makes no difference who is doing the riot, looting or burning, they will never get a green light.
Try again and grow up in the process.
Some of you like using a video game or TV - Game of Thrones mentality for solving problems.
Draw a line or put up a barrier and post a sign that states "Any Unauthorized Person that proceeds beyond this Point will be shot".
How many of the democrat riots of 2020 were prosecuted? 😂
 
Wait, you "know" they released the letter to be able to up the charges?

Are you saying that they would not have been able to up the charges without releasing the letter?

If that is what you are saying, I believe your understanding of the law here is flawed. Please feel free to correct me on FL law if I am incorrect.

I believe they have the capacity to up the charges without actually providing a free advertisement for a "wanted dead or alive" bounty on a another human being's life. In fact, releasing evidence against the defendant could be prejudicial to his right to a fair trial, and, if this was sanctioned by a prosecutor, it should subject that prosecutor to potential ethical complaints.

This release leads reasonable people to suspect that perhaps the authorities had other reasons for wanting the bounty published broadly.

They cited to it in legal memorandum to keep him in custody and defeat any concern he was being held on charges which, by themselves, might lead to release.

Its hard to imagine that anyone thinks that Routh is going to pay them $150,000 is they succeed in assassinating Trump. As in, impossible to believe.
Thanks for the reply.

I did not see a reply to the original "up the charges" assertion. That is fine, I really didn't think it had anything to do with that.

Reports indicate the release was part of a custody determination. I am exceedingly skeptical that the government had to include the images or exact language of the letter in order to file a memorandum indicating the defendant was a danger to the former president or to others. Attorneys know how to draft those documents in support of high bonds for suspects without getting into that level of detail. Charging the defendant with attempted assasination of another human being would likely also justify the higher bond without release of the letter.

I am also not sure it is impossible to believe this guy might have $150k. He has been quite the world traveler. That had to take some coin. Additionally, even if most sane people would not have believed he had it, another crazy might have thought he did. (I will note that I am not sure he is "insane." His communications so far released seem to indicate he knows right from wrong and is able to understand the consequences of his actions.) If anything, I suspect $150k is on the high side for a contract killing/solicitation.

Our government has, sadly, passed the point of no return as far a securing the benefit of the doubt from many Americans in these circumstances; we deserve better.

There is no justifiable reason to have released the "hit" letter. None at all. Everything that was gained by releasing the letter at this time could have been gained another way.

Everything, that is, except one: publicizing a payout for a successful attempt on another man's life.
 

VN Store



Back
Top