TrumpPutingate III: the beginning of the end

#2,652
#2,652
Liberals are so stupid they're still going along with the Trump/Russia collusion thing.
There's nothing there of any evidence that shows Trump colluded w/anybody only Hillary & the DNC broke any & all the Laws. Tick Tock for Dems.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#2,653
#2,653
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
Liberals are so stupid they're still going along with the Trump/Russia collusion thing.
There's nothing there of any evidence that shows Trump colluded w/anybody only Hillary & the DNC broke any & all the Laws. Tick Tock for Dems.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't say stupid. I'd say they trust the mainstream media to report the truth.

That isn't stupid, but extremely naive.
 
Last edited:
#2,659
#2,659
"That Devin Nunes and Republicans denied the ability of the minority, the Democratic members of that committee, to put out its report is just appalling. I think it, it really underscores just how partisan Mr. Nunes has been. He has abused the office of the chairmanship of HPSCI. And I don't say that lightly," he said on NBC's "Meet the Press."
He also said the failure to provide the classified information that the memo is based on shows Nunes is being "exceptionally partisan."
"We don't have access to the underlying information of the Nunes memo which really, you know, clearly indicates that he was being exceptionally partisan in this."
This is not the first time Brennan has spoken out about the memo. He tweeted Thursday morning that he had never seen such "reckless partisan behavior."
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2,661
#2,661
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
Liberals are so stupid they're still going along with the Trump/Russia collusion thing.
There's nothing there of any evidence that shows Trump colluded w/anybody only Hillary & the DNC broke any & all the Laws. Tick Tock for Dems.
Click to expand...

Hillary and the Democrats employed a hired gun to collect unverified "intelligence" and much of it from Russian officials. They took it as gospel and used it to abuse civil rights of US citizens.

This was the "collusion" with the Russians. M
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#2,662
#2,662
luthervol said:
"That Devin Nunes and Republicans denied the ability of the minority, the Democratic members of that committee, to put out its report is just appalling. I think it, it really underscores just how partisan Mr. Nunes has been. He has abused the office of the chairmanship of HPSCI. And I don't say that lightly," he said on NBC's "Meet the Press."
He also said the failure to provide the classified information that the memo is based on shows Nunes is being "exceptionally partisan."
"We don't have access to the underlying information of the Nunes memo which really, you know, clearly indicates that he was being exceptionally partisan in this."
This is not the first time Brennan has spoken out about the memo. He tweeted Thursday morning that he had never seen such "reckless partisan behavior."
Click to expand...

:cray: Please, cry me a river w/those crocodile liberal tears. Conservatives don't care about your problem w/that. Dems have bigger problems than that crap you sling around about your little nothing burger memo.
 
#2,663
#2,663
New York Times thinks the Phillies won the Super Bowl

Breaking news: The Phillies have won the Super Bowl.

In a hastily sent Facebook post, the New York Times inadvertently gave the Phillies credit for the Eagles’ stunning 41-33 victory over the Patriots in Super Bowl LII.

It’s just a good thing Eagles running back Jay Ajayi reads the Philadelphia Inquirer to keep up with the Birds.
 
#2,664
#2,664
Franklin Pierce said:
New York Times thinks the Phillies won the Super Bowl

Breaking news: The Phillies have won the Super Bowl.

In a hastily sent Facebook post, the New York Times inadvertently gave the Phillies credit for the Eagles’ stunning 41-33 victory over the Patriots in Super Bowl LII.

It’s just a good thing Eagles running back Jay Ajayi reads the Philadelphia Inquirer to keep up with the Birds.
Click to expand...

Did Mike Schmidt win MVP?
 
#2,665
#2,665
Franklin Pierce said:
New York Times thinks the Phillies won the Super Bowl

Breaking news: The Phillies have won the Super Bowl.

In a hastily sent Facebook post, the New York Times inadvertently gave the Phillies credit for the Eagles’ stunning 41-33 victory over the Patriots in Super Bowl LII.

It’s just a good thing Eagles running back Jay Ajayi reads the Philadelphia Inquirer to keep up with the Birds.
Click to expand...

The commercials were bad. Bud Lite is really pressing their luck on the dilly dilly franchise. Trying way too hard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2,666
#2,666
Hey guys, snowflake lib here.

Anyway, I like to read this forum for the conservative view on certain topics.

I think we call all agree Russia influenced our election. To what degree is subject for debate, yada yada yada.

Whether or not the Trump campaign either helped them, or "colluded" remains to be seen and I have confidence we'll find out either way.

The question I have is: why do you guys think Russia wanted Trump to win, or rather, Hillary to lose? Why did they work for that goal?
 
#2,667
#2,667
Kingston Vol said:
Hey guys, snowflake lib here.

Anyway, I like to read this forum for the conservative view on certain topics.

I think we call all agree Russia influenced our election. To what degree is subject for debate, yada yada yada.

Whether or not the Trump campaign either helped them, or "colluded" remains to be seen and I have confidence we'll find out either way.

The question I have is: why do you guys think Russia wanted Trump to win, or rather, Hillary to lose? Why did they work for that goal?
Click to expand...

Disagree on your assertion we can all agree re Russia.

That is media push - haven't seen a shred of evidence to confirm it happened.
 
#2,668
#2,668
Kingston Vol said:
The question I have is: why do you guys think Russia wanted Trump to win, or rather, Hillary to lose? Why did they work for that goal?
Click to expand...

Funny, I've asked that same question multiple times in the past and never got an answer.

I mean, wasn't Hillary the one they should have wanted since her dealings with them in the past showed her to be more open to them?
 
#2,669
#2,669
ajvol01 said:
Disagree on your assertion we can all agree re Russia.

That is media push - haven't seen a shred of evidence to confirm it happened.
Click to expand...

Interesting: you don't believe the FBI or CIA's assertion that it happened?

And if you don't, what would the motive be to mislead the public re: Russian interference?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2,670
#2,670
Grand Vol said:
Funny, I've asked that same question multiple times in the past and never got an answer.

I mean, wasn't Hillary the one they should have wanted since her dealings with them in the past showed her to be more open to them?
Click to expand...

What about the 2012 election? Its ridiculous to believe they had an effect on 2016 and did nothing in 2012? 2008? It looks like to me they worked both sides to cause confusion and discord and this has been successful. They used each campaigns search for damaging information on their opponent, then manipulated the in office party to use the intelligence services for their benefit. They had the republicans in meetings searching for dirt. Looks like a win win for them overall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2,671
#2,671
Kingston Vol said:
Hey guys, snowflake lib here.

Anyway, I like to read this forum for the conservative view on certain topics.

I think we call all agree Russia influenced our election. To what degree is subject for debate, yada yada yada.

Whether or not the Trump campaign either helped them, or "colluded" remains to be seen and I have confidence we'll find out either way.

The question I have is: why do you guys think Russia wanted Trump to win, or rather, Hillary to lose? Why did they work for that goal?
Click to expand...

Thanks dropping in and realizing why you don't drop in.
Something, something deep state conspiracy.
Something, something lock her up.
Something, something but Obama.
Something, something fake news.
Hope I didn't miss something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2,672
#2,672
Kingston Vol said:
Interesting: you don't believe the FBI or CIA's assertion that it happened?

And if you don't, what would the motive be to mislead the public re: Russian interference?
Click to expand...

I can assert that you are a closet Bama fan, but with no proof, really doesn’t mean ****.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#2,673
#2,673
IPleadInsanity said:
What about the 2012 election? Its ridiculous to believe they had an effect on 2016 and did nothing in 2012? 2008? It looks like to me they worked both sides to cause confusion and discord and this has been successful. They used each campaigns search for damaging information on their opponent, then manipulated the in office party to use the intelligence services for their benefit. They had the republicans in meetings searching for dirt. Looks like a win win for them overall.
Click to expand...

Ding Ding! We have a winner.
 
#2,675
#2,675
IPleadInsanity said:
What about the 2012 election? Its ridiculous to believe they had an effect on 2016 and did nothing in 2012? 2008? It looks like to me they worked both sides to cause confusion and discord and this has been successful. They used each campaigns search for damaging information on their opponent, then manipulated the in office party to use the intelligence services for their benefit. They had the republicans in meetings searching for dirt. Looks like a win win for them overall.
Click to expand...

So your assertion is that they helped Trump because they assumed Hillary would win? So basically they just wanted a contentious election? And for her to go into office with a cloud over her? I could buy that.

Did Trump play into that with the "it's rigged, folks" stuff before the election when all the polls said he would lose?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top